46
Spin Zone / Re: Why are so many Democrats running for President?
« on: August 10, 2019, 12:49:20 PM »
Corey Lewandowski sure made the news when he grabbed the woman's forearm.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think everyone agrees that the climate changes naturally, and has so drastically. I still have no received an answer on what percentage of climate change some think is man made, and what is natural. Also, if there are wide swings in natural climate change, which we know there are, how can we tell if any "fixes" we put in place are working? Are the fixes just reduced use of fossil fuels? If so, what will the taxes, fees, and other revenue do towards fixing climate change. What are governments doing with this revenue? How are they measuring the effect of whatever they are doing on climate change?
LOL. That's what my Winchester Bolt action Model 69 .22LR is for. My Great Uncle gave it to me when I was 12. He bought it new in 1935 or so.
Now, I just use a Colt M4 to piss off the progressives.
A helluva way to market.....piss off half of your customer base.
On that, CNN is still swirling around the drain financially, yet they keep up their anti-Trump, anti-American broadcasting even though it’s putting them under.
There are no unpaid workers.
Just workers that don’t have to go to work for a while, or some that do have to work with deferred pay, but all will be paid later anyway
Trump should find the largest arena he can to give the SOTU. There are several football stadiums that can hold over 100,000 spectators. Daytona Speedway can hold around 160,000. Indianapolis can hold around 400,000!
Charge admission. $10 for the cheap seats and whatever the market will bear for the suites. After expenses, donate all the money to charity, or the wall. Wouldn't it be cool to see a few hundred thousand people cheering Trump!
I'd take the Bo there, wherever it is, and buy about a $200 seat.
I am not a Border Security expert, so I don't know if there are more effective tools than a wall to keep illegals out. What is so bad to the Democrats about a Wall? It certainly can't hurt border security. So my point remains. Why are the Democrats against border security in general?
To me giving money for other methods to secure the border just means more bureaucracy, more corruption, more government do nothing jobs, and maybe more questionable technology.
Once the wall is complete and assuming it is 100% effective, it will only reduce the flow of illegal aliens by about 33%. That is because about 67% of all illegals arrived legally and overstayed their visas.