1726
Spin Zone / Re: Unwanted sexual advances; be honest.
« on: October 19, 2016, 07:49:31 AM »So Jeff stops by once again....Ok, that's pretty friggin' funny.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So Jeff stops by once again....Ok, that's pretty friggin' funny.
I have always tried to treat everyone with respect. In a store or at a restaurant I always address someone by their name if I know it. I am no more important than any of them and they deserve to be treated nicely.Yep. When my dad died, he had everyone from bankers to waitresses show up at his wake. He treated everyone with graciousness, used their names, and engaged them.
To think that Hillary goes around treating people like shit and acting like she is just above everyone is truly fucked up.
You're still dancing around the point as it relates to Trump and this election. When you're caught on a hot mic telling someone you grab women by the pussy because you're a star, it is difficult to claim character assassination or whine about Rule #4 when it goes public. (I'd also quibble that it's #4.) You also seem to be insinuating that these women have been dug up to fabricate their stories. I'd be inclined to believe you in our cutthroat political environment, except that Trump admits to doing what these women say he did.
It is a tactic that both sides use against the other. However, in the instant case we have a man who, by his own mouth, did the things these women claim he did. And then he went on national TV and said he never did those things, despite previously saying he did. Now if I was a woman who had my crotch grabbed years ago by this dipshit, it'd rightly burn me up to see him on national TV claiming he never did those things, and I'd be highly motivated to go public just to screw him over.These alleged things didn't happen in the Mad Men era of the 1960s. This was the 1990s or so - I've been in business during all the years this stuff was alleged to take place.
So maybe you're right. Maybe the Clinton campaign dug up women who were willing to fabricate these instances. But perhaps you're wrong, and Trump did to many women exactly what he said he did.
What's your point?
Oh, yeah.
Hilary Clinton is being shown to be even more criminal than we thought, which was a lot, so obviously the real story is that Donald Trump said something mean and hurt some snowflake feelings.
What a joke.
No. Trump never said he would boost the national debt.That's in the playbook. Static economic scoring (I.e. projections to NOT include the effect on the economy) when it suits them and damages their opponent, and dynamic scoring when it benefits them.
Trump said he would reduce taxes on business.
The MSM quoted a report from a liberal think tank that said reducing taxes would increase the debt. What the MSM left out was that same report used the qualifier that this conclusion does not take into account the affect on productivity that Trump's tax policy might have.
I also read another report yesterday in the news paper that said Clinton's tax policy would increase the debt more than predicted by that same report, because the effects of Clinton's tax INCREASES would have on productivity were not included.
I love it when people say "In Trump's own words" then go on to quote an anti-Trump source.
Obama was not terribly unpredictable. He slid a little to the center, but mostly what he has done is not a surprise.No one but the most radical leftists think that Obama "slid a little to the center."
I know we have carriers not that far from there. How come a few F/A-18's didn't show up? Fire a missile at them and see what happens, although the Captain will undoubtedly have his hands tied by the micro managing Administration.I go back to my original premise. Take the USS Wisconsin out of mothballs, park it 20 miles off shore, and hammer a 10-square mile of land for a few days. Another missile is fired 50 miles away? Move and repeat as necessary. Such aggressive actions will cease.
Cosby.Was Cosby running for president? I missed that.
Maybe he does actually assault women: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/donald-trump-women.html?_r=0I give very little credence to stories that "pop up" 30 years after the fact, when there is zero contemporaneous proof or evidence except recollections that someone told their friends or family. There were recourses back then, including lawsuits. None of these people chose that path, even though a millionaire is alleged to have done this.
At least 3 silkworm cruise missile attacks on a US Navy Destroyer in 4 days and we have done FUCKING NOTHING???Trump spoke like a Marine 11 years ago. Much more important stuff going on. 😡
WHAT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING?
'Gimp
Hilary Clinton appeals to many liberals simply because she is all pro abortion and try as they might to pretend otherwise, that is the key to their entire movement. Somehow abortion has become the holy grail of liberalism, to the point that their railings on the subject get more insane every week.She even pulled that dog whistle out at the debate, stating that Trump, who once said that he was "pro-choice in every respect" would nominate justices who would overturn Roe v Wade.
There are very few real hard-line liberals that even stop to ink about any of Hilary's scandals beyond blaming them on Fox news. Intelligent and thoughtful consideration of the damage she has done to the State Department and the country is a foreign concept to most liberals and would be met with screeds of make believe offense and outrage if it was suggested.
Seems Raddatz wants to debate Trump herself. What a sorry excuse for a moderator.
I guessed as much without having to watch the debate, nothing about Trump in my FB feed since the debate started which means not only is she doing poorly he has not stepped on it in any significant way.
That plus his again PUNK of the media by surprising them with several of Bill and Hillary's victims by inviting them to his pre-debate prep - priceless!
'Gimp