PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on December 20, 2023, 06:54:45 AM

Title: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on December 20, 2023, 06:54:45 AM
(http://www.pilotspin.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7341.0;attach=3839)
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Lucifer on December 20, 2023, 07:30:06 AM
Expansion of the police state.

This is a police force that answers to the elites inside the beltway.   By planting them inside other states, the reasoning is anyone the regime disagrees with can be investigated and arrested outside of the beltway without going through various state LEO. 

Just imagine Texas or Florida setting up offices within the DC beltway to investigate and/or arrest people there.   The regime would shut it down in a nana second.

BHO lamented during his first two terms how he wanted a federal police force.  He has one now in the FBI, but is looking to bolster that.

Remember "Defund the Police"?   This was the prelude to get local and state LEO defunded so they could be replaced by federal agencies.
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Anthony on December 20, 2023, 09:15:23 AM
Republicans are fine with a police state.
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Username on December 22, 2023, 08:07:29 AM
Republicans are fine with a police state.
I truly believe that all of the "elites" are actively working toward a federal police state.  Defund the local police, replace them with federals.  That's the only way to effectively control the proletariat.  Arrest without cause, hold without trial, execute without consequence.  Every now and then throw out a sacrificial lamb to let people believe that they actually have a say in things.  We are going to full police state.  For your own good, of course.

I had a colonoscopy yesterday and feel well and truly Bidened.
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Rush on December 22, 2023, 09:34:39 AM
I believe this is another surreptitious way to expand power, but Lehto here thinks it's a good thing.  He isn't considering the dark side.

The DOJ has created an "officer misconduct database" to track its own officers and make it easier to eliminate bad apples. Sounds good, right?  First, the DOJ is going to police its own self?  HA!  You expect me to buy that?

What I think they really are doing is creating an easy way to get rid of any of their own who do not go along with the Uniparty. Anyone with unapproved political opinions.

The net result of this thing is that if an officer is disciplined or fired for misconduct, he will not be able to get another job in any other agency that has access to this database which would be all Federal agencies. Steve here thinks it should be implemented in all local police departments too.

Again, that's great if you're only targeting pathological sadistic police, of which there are some, who have no business being law enforcement officers. But I STRONGLY suspect the DOJ doesn't care about that, but instead have created a way to destroy the career of anyone they decide isn't playing along with the machine.  They plant a false allegation, fire the guy and bingo, can no longer work for the feds at all.  Another tool to purge those who oppose them.

Tell me where I'm wrong here...

Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: elwood blues on December 22, 2023, 09:48:41 AM
Could digital ID be far behind?  Again, I don't know what the mark will be or how it will come about, but it's all about control.
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Anthony on December 22, 2023, 11:09:17 AM
Could digital ID be far behind?  Again, I don't know what the mark will be or how it will come about, but it's all about control.

The elites and our government elite hate that we can travel freely. They probably hate GA most of all, but know that is quickly dying. Hence the push to EVs and public transportation.
Title: Re: What is this the beginning of?
Post by: Lucifer on December 27, 2023, 05:10:41 AM
https://breannamorello.substack.com/p/why-are-us-capitol-police-quietly?publication_id=996221&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=1g8tya

Quote
After January 6, 2021, United States Capitol Police opened 2 satellite offices outside of Washington D.C.. One of those offices was opened in former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s area and another was opened in Tampa, Florida.


Although Congressman Matt Gaetz and former Florida Representative Anthony Sabatini attempted to block the Tampa office from opening, it opened anyway. In the months that followed its opening, dozens of Floridians were targeted by the Department of Justice and FBI. Many of those individuals were accused of nonviolent crimes. They had their homes illegally raided by the FBI.

USCP claims they’re opening these offices because the threats against members of Congress have increased throughout the years. I personally reached out to USCP and asked them to supply me with the supporting data regarding these so-called threats and they refused to do so.

Earlier this year, USCP announced their plans to open three more satellite offices. These offices are opening/opened in Texas, Milwaukee and Boston. USCP says they opened these satellite offices “due to the increased threat environment.” Again, they make these claims without showing any supporting evidence.

HERE’S HOW IT WORKS:

When a member of Congress or their staff are threatened, USCP gather all the information and evidence. Those details are then provided to the FBI. The FBI makes the arrests. So if the FBI is the agency responding to these threats, why would USCP need to open offices? Is the FBI so overwhelmed with work that they need additional assistance nearby? Well I asked the three Florida FBI field offices about that and this is what the Tampa field office told me:


Earlier this week, I spoke with FBI whistleblower and fellow for the Center for Renewing America Steve Friend. This is what Friend told me about these offices.

Why would the USCP be operating outside of Washington D.C.? GREAT QUESTION—so glad you asked. USCP does not have to comply with FOIA requests. Meaning, I cannot request internal emails, memos and information regarding their work or spending. They operate without transparency. So if the USCP were doing other investigations—I wouldn’t be able to submit a FOIA request to obtain more information.

Ultimately this issue falls at the hands of the Speaker of the House. Nancy Pelosi started it, and Kevin McCarthy allowed it to continue.

So, will the constitutional attorney and newly-elected Speaker put an end to this? Well, I’ve called and emailed multiple members of Speaker Mike Johnson’s team—they haven’t responded. One person did forward my email to another staffer, but they failed to give me a direct answer on the matter.


So will Speaker Mike Johnson do what’s right and shut this down? I hope so. After the holiday, we will begin to launch a call-to-action. This will involve respectfully contacting the Speaker’s office and asking them to put an end to this. Make sure you subscribe to my podcast to stay up-to-date on this story.