Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Is there something wrong with getting blamed for shutting down the government?
What's a trillion or so between friends.
It's Article 4, Section 4, Clause 2 of the constitution.
FJB has failed, along with congress. They all need to be removed from office.
I don't think Trump airlined in over 300,000 under cover either.I think border states should do their own enforcement, like TX is trying to do. Ignore Federal law and kick the Feds out.
We have FJB ignoring laws, endangering states by not providing security under the law in defiance of his oath, bragging about defying the supreme court, not to mention rooms full of evidence of bribery, diverting funding from other agencies to give to the invaders, yet congress still just can't seem to find a reason to impeach the bastard.
My friend is most focused on the fiscal aspect of Government. He is now convinced, as am I, that there is no saving the country and it will soon collapse.
There is no stomach in D.C. for fiscal responsibility. Budgets are not passed anymore and we just cruise from CR to CR that is passed at the last minute in the dead of night with tons of spending crammed in it and the President will never veto it.
I believe the opposite of what I'm told by the Feds.You can trust that any bill before congress does exactly the opposite of what its title says. The "Border security bill" does nothing but allow more illegals into the country.
Gotta admit, I'm not really sure what this means. Someone smarter than me can explain?
https://patriot.online/notice/AfLqvtimEDDVbcW7G4
Came from this tweet on X: https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1763259723292279262?s=20
Gotta admit, I'm not really sure what this means. Someone smarter than me can explain?
https://patriot.online/notice/AfLqvtimEDDVbcW7G4
Came from this tweet on X: https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1763259723292279262?s=20
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a major victory in defense of the United States Constitution, with a court ruling that the $1.7 trillion omnibus spending package was unlawfully passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in 2022 without a quorum physically present as constitutionally required. The Court enjoined the defendants—the United States Attorney General, the United States Department of Justice, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and their officials—from enforcing a provision of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 against the State of Texas that was proved to impose unjust cost burdens on the State.
The Quorum Clause of the U.S. Constitution mandates that the chambers of Congress must have a majority of members physically present to constitute a quorum before most official business may be conducted. However, in December 2022, fewer than half of the House of Representatives were physically present when they passed the $1.7 trillion Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, with those not present voting by proxy. When President Joe Biden signed the illegally passed law, Attorney General Paxton sued and sought an injunction against the implementation of certain provisions of the law affecting the State of Texas.
“Congress acted egregiously by passing the largest spending bill in U.S. history with fewer than half the members of the House bothering to do their jobs, show up, and vote in person,” said Attorney General Paxton. “Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi abused proxy voting under the pretext of COVID-19 to pass this law, then Biden signed it, knowing they violated the Constitution. This was a stunning violation of the rule of law. I am relieved the Court upheld the Constitution.”
The Texas Public Policy Foundation served as co-counsel. “This meticulous, 120-page opinion was written after a full trial on the merits,” said TPPF senior attorney Matt Miller. “The Court correctly concluded that the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 violated the Quorum Clause of the U.S. Constitution because a majority of House members was not physically present when the $1.7 trillion spending bill was passed. Proxy voting is unconstitutional.”
2 Likes