Reagan wasn't electable.

Quote from: FarLeftTeaParty on January 19, 2016, 07:25:53 AM

What seems to be the typical response over here:

"Oh yeah? You just can't take a humorous and clever response! <insert homophobic slander>"

Then:

"<high five each other> Yeah! You told him!"

Ya'll give yourself so much credit for being the open minded ones who are all about open discussion and all sides of an argument? Then when anybody points out faults in your persona you start slinging homophobic trash.

Again I say that none of you would sling this trash in person. Hide behind your keyboards.

I think you have a far superior view of what constitutes clever and/or humorous, but that's what makes a world.
Relax, take off your high hat, stop attacking people just because you're bored, lonely, or gagging for more attention, and set awhile.
If we haven't skewered your favorite sacred cow, stick around, we promise to get to it.

The problem is that Bryan is his own sacred cow, and that we don't think he's the smartest or funniest guy in the room like they do at POA. That is just entirely unacceptable because ... the internet.

Quote from: asechrest on January 03, 2016, 09:35:40 AM

Chris didn't say FC "hates" gay women, only that he might have a problem with them. This is not a bad assumption given his history. The use of a pejorative is actually a great indication that you have a problem with a person(s).

You don't have to hate, nor even have a "Problem" with LGBT people to disagree with their views.  I am tired of people labeling those that disagree with them a "hater" or a "denier".  It is a ploy by the left to demonize, and discredit, and it is going to stop, and those entire PC movement is going to be turned over on its ass.

If you disagree with someone and attempt to "win" by pointing out their gender and sexual orientation I will assume you are unable to argue using any other means.

I also kinda think folks who do that are open to ridicule and probably easy pickings (see above inability to argue any other way).

I have yet to read one article about a Kardashian or Jenner.  I've seen the headlines, so yeah I'm aware that he's really Caitlin now, but I have no interest in any of the details. 

What is the benefit of pilotspin being public?  I kind of like the idea of the SZ not being able to be Google searched.

I'm leaning this way, too.