PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Jaybird180 on December 03, 2015, 08:15:26 AM

Title: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: Jaybird180 on December 03, 2015, 08:15:26 AM
Anyone ever read the book (or see the movie) The Manchurian Candidate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate)?  The stuff that's going on lately....hmmmmm.......
 
 
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: nddons on December 03, 2015, 08:30:27 AM
Yes I did. Which is why I've called Obama the Manchurian Candidate on the site formerly known as The Front Porch of Aviation.
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: Johnh on December 03, 2015, 08:37:04 AM
Anyone ever read the book (or see the movie) The Manchurian Candidate (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate)?  The stuff that's going on lately....hmmmmm.......
The conspiracist in me has often thought of Obama as a possible "Manchurian Candidate".  That would explain a lot.
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: Anthony on December 03, 2015, 10:56:47 AM
This was obviously a TERROR CELL.  How many more are out there, and where are they?  Of course they want to take away legally owned firearms so the terrorists can't get them, even though the have, and use them ILLEGALLY.  They are already banned in California.  Duh.
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: Florida Cracker on December 04, 2015, 07:44:14 AM
With the President refusing to call it what it is, and the attorney general threatening to lock up anyone that declares they intend to protect themselves against Islamic terrorists, Manchurian Candidate may be a lot less than what it is we are seeing.
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on January 05, 2016, 07:40:58 AM
What happened to the THIRD shooter. All reporting early in the incident claimed THREE were active.

Was (s)he the "handler"?
Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: President-Elect Bob Noel on January 05, 2016, 07:47:43 AM
What happened to the THIRD shooter. All reporting early in the incident claimed THREE were active.

Was (s)he the "handler"?

Other than reports of a third shooter, was all of the early reporting accurate?


Title: Re: San Bernardino Shooting
Post by: acrogimp on January 05, 2016, 07:57:12 AM
Eye witnesses and early media reporting are both notoriously unreliable - such as the reports of gunmen on foot in neighborhoods.  Pure fog of war and the desire of news outlets to be 'first'.

Think back to the Oklahoma City bombing, reports were that police were after three arab men in their late twenties/early thirties in a late model brown Chevrolet pick-up, initially.  Pretty specific description, more so than '3 white men' in San Bernadino, yet we were told it was Timothy McVeigh.

These two in San Bernadino are poster children radical Islamist terrorists, and most likely worked alone - no actual evidence to the contrary with respect to the shooting has been presented.

'Gimp