Thanks for the logical and calming words. And thanks for not ripping in to me.
But I'm still not convinced one way or the other. Believe it or not, I am willing to listen to both sides, but we do have a problem. Perhaps Archie Bunker was right when he said the way to stop airliner hijackings (very popular in the '60s) was to "arm all the passengers. I don't know if that is a good idea on an airliner, but maybe arming the teachers (or at least allowing trained volunteer teachers to be armed) would get the killers out of the schools (and into the churches, or other gun free zones).
Mass shootings are a problem. What is a solution that works? "Just enforce all the current rules" is not working and won't work.
"Gun Free Zones" are an invitation for mass shootings. Why? The shooter knows no one will shoot back.
Also, if you want to see how well gun control works, just go to the heavy liberal bastions of the US that have very strict gun control (Chicago, Detroit, LA, NY, etc) and see how well it's working there.
Back to the mouth foaming progressives and their MSM. Notice when a shooter is taken out by a gun carrying citizen those stories get buried?