PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Jaybird180 on June 08, 2016, 08:23:42 PM
-
http://wearechange.org/rothschilds-hillary-clinton/
Shhhhh....don't tell Henning that he was right.
-
blind squirrels and all that...
-
Shhhhh....don't tell Henning that he was right.
It's all the Jooooooooozzzz fault.
-
It is interesting that they back Hillary. That says to me that they see Trump the same way I do and that says something considering that Trump is a self professed billionaire. One might think they run in the same circles, or at least support each other against the Liberal onslaught. Hmmm...
-
Like Soros?
-
It is interesting that they back Hillary. That says to me that they see Trump the same way I do and that says something considering that Trump is a self professed billionaire. One might think they run in the same circles, or at least support each other against the Liberal onslaught. Hmmm...
The Rothschilds only want someone they can buy.
-
The Rothschilds only want someone they can buy.
Donnie had a big meeting with lobbyists to hustle for donations just yesterday!
-
Donnie had a big meeting with lobbyists to hustle for donations just yesterday!
I read the article you linked to. Can you show me the part where he "hustled for donations" I didn't see that. All I saw was a lot of rehetoric about how he hates lobbyists and now he is asking their opinions.
It wouldn't surprise me (or upset me) if he was soliciting donations. I just didn't see it. A Presidential campaign these days takes north of a billion dollars. It has to come from somewhere. The problem comes from how badly a politician sells his influence for those donations. I know that Clinton would sell her soul, and the souls of her "supporters" for large donations. I don't know how far Trump would go.
-
I know that Clinton would sell her soul, and the souls of her "supporters" for large donations. I don't know how far Trump would go.
The Clintons have already sold their souls. Foreign governments, Wall Street Banks/Investment Bankers, Enemies of the U.S. have all made the Clintons RICH by their donations for INFLUENCE. They have no problem acting in a treasoness manner for PERSONAL PROFIT.
-
I know that Clinton would sell her soul, and the souls of her "supporters" for large donations. I don't know how far Trump would go.
While Donnie sold his for $35k a pop for Trump U degrees, and encouraged his sales people to go after people with the least to lose.
-
While Donnie sold his for $35k a pop for Trump U degrees, and encouraged his sales people to go after people with the least to lose.
Apples and parsnips. Yeah, the Trump-U thing sounds a little shady, but how much of that is due a "Great Left Wing Conspiracy" to make Trump look bad and to take the spotlight off of Hillary? And it has noting to do with lobbyists.
-
Apples and parsnips. Yeah, the Trump-U thing sounds a little shady, but how much of that is due a "Great Left Wing Conspiracy" to make Trump look bad and to take the spotlight off of Hillary? And it has noting to do with lobbyists.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/
-
Apples and parsnips. Yeah, the Trump-U thing sounds a little shady, but how much of that is due a "Great Left Wing Conspiracy" to make Trump look bad and to take the spotlight off of Hillary? And it has noting to do with lobbyists.
OK, so it's evil to take millions from big donors, but those donors paying (ie. Trump) are good, and taking thousands from those who can't afford it, is good.
Trump U doesn't sound "a little shady", it was a scam outright perpetrated on those who could least afford it.
-
OK, so it's evil to take millions from big donors, but those donors paying (ie. Trump) are good, and taking thousands from those who can't afford it, is good.
Trump U doesn't sound "a little shady", it was a scam outright perpetrated on those who could least afford it.
It may very well have been, but it doesn't even come close to comparing to all of the things Hilary has done over the years.
I'm not a huge Trump fan and I've made that pretty clear, but when comparing Hilary's scandals and crimes to Trump's, it needs to be put into perspective.
-
The Rothschilds only want someone they can buy.
Trust me, Donald's for sale.
-
Trust me, Donald's for sale.
His entire life has been about selling his name and reputation, it's just that the bidders have gotten a lot bigger.
The thing is, now his donors can avoid pesky "campaign finance" disclosures by becoming "investors" in his real-estate ventures
-
His entire life has been about selling his name and reputation, it's just that the bidders have gotten a lot bigger.
The thing is, now his donors can avoid pesky "campaign finance" disclosures by becoming "investors" in his real-estate ventures
Hey, Great idea.
-
Hey, Great idea.
So why does Jeff avoid talking about the Clinton Foundation and all of the scams associated with that?
-
So why does Jeff avoid talking about the Clinton Foundation and all of the scams associated with that?
I think the Clinton Foundation is enough, and big enough, to cost her the election, or at least it should be. Receiving donations from foreign governments to buy influence over U.S. foreign policy is public corruption of the highest order, not to mention the other crimes committed during the course of it. Then you have the whole email scandal, which is a whole other issue. It really boggles my mind how she's even still a candidate (I know why).
Like I said in my post before, I'm not a huge Trump fan but when you compare his Trump University "scandal" to any of Hilary's scandals, it pales in comparison.
-
I think the Clinton Foundation is enough, and big enough, to cost her the election, or at least it should be. Receiving donations from foreign governments to buy influence over U.S. foreign policy is public corruption of the highest order, not to mention the other crimes committed during the course of it. Then you have the whole email scandal, which is a whole other issue. It really boggles my mind how she's even still a candidate (I know why).
Like I said in my post before, I'm not a huge Trump fan but when you compare his Trump University "scandal" to any of Hilary's scandals, it pales in comparison.
The whole Laureate University scam makes Trump U look like a kindergarten.
-
The whole Laureate University scam makes Trump U look like a kindergarten.
If you had the money, a Kindergarten flunk-put could have graduated TrumpU
-
So why does Jeff avoid talking about the Clinton Foundation and all of the scams associated with that?
Why should he? Would that produce interesting, or thoughtful discussions on this forum? I don't think so. Who is here to defend Hillary?
-
Why should he? Would that produce interesting, or thoughtful discussions on this forum? I don't think so. Who is here to defend Hillary?
I don't know anyone that defends Hillary. Yet, she is still the Dem nominee. All the people that I know that were huge Obama supporters back down when asked about Hillary, yet she is still the Dem nominee. None of trump supporters and none of the Stop-Trumpers that I know like Hillary. None of the young women that worked for me like Hillary.
The only one I have heard defend Hillary is Steingar. That should tell you all something.
But I guess the people with enough money that need to buy influence might support her. After all, she is easily bought (for enough money).
-
Why should he? Would that produce interesting, or thoughtful discussions on this forum? I don't think so. Who is here to defend Hillary?
Exactly what has Hillary done that warrants some type of defense or accolade? Even Steingar can't point to one thing she has done right.
-
Exactly what has Hillary done that warrants some type of defense or accolade? Even Steingar can't point to one thing she has done right.
She and Bill have made $200 million plus with the Clinton Foundation by selling little more than influence. Does that count?
-
She and Bill have made $200 million plus with the Clinton Foundation by selling little more than influence. Does that count?
Well the Russian Re-set she did turned out really well, right? And Libya was a success in toppling Quadaffi. Then there was Benghazi which turned out great as she decided to defend our Ambassador and staff. Right? Then she put our state secrets at risk with her private email server, but that doesn't matter.
"At this point, what difference does it make?"
-
His entire life has been about selling his name and reputation...
So what? Don't we (at least the productive) all?