I listened to that whole thing.  If males DON'T behave like that the human species is done for.  This is entirely 100% normal male homo sapiens sapiens behavior. Trump has nothing to apologize for. Any males shocked are liars or have been so weakened by all the soy in our food supply or other sources of osmotic estrogen dosing (feminism in the media, trying to date today's entitlement brats of young females) that they truly believe this horseshit that men should not talk this way about women.  If anything is natural and evolutionary, this male behavior is. All Trump proved here is he is a virile male, or at least talks like one.

Any females shocked at this are either so young that they've swallowed hook line and sinker today's politically correct climate that all males are pedophiles and potential rapists, or are aged feminists who would like the male gender to be reduced to hobbled sperm donors and bank accounts, nothing more.  Anything hinting of testosterone is contemptible.  THAT is what the reaction to this video is proving: That this society is so anti-male today with the rotten fruits of bitter feminism and the most anti-nature ideology ever cooked up by man (leftism) that any display of normal male ardor can now be weaponized against any male not approved by the elite leftist machine.

The way Kaine kept interrupting Pence right from the start was one of the rudest, nastiest excuses for "debating" I have ever had the mispleasure of seeing. That guy is a piece of shit.

No doubt, they must really be worried that Hillary can't pull it off.

The "coronation" is not going as planned.

When the UN actually does something about Muslim slave trading, Muslim sex slave trading and Muslim child sex slave trading, come back and talk to me. Because the UN is run by representatives of some of the most egregious human rights violators they say nothing about the real problem of slavery because some Muslim might get his under pants in a twist.

Maybe not, but it says more about the person than you realize.

If it were not so, good lawyers wouldn't bother dressing gangbangers up in a suit for the courtroom.

Who said "standalone?"  You.  Not me.  I'm for robust AND effortful, because robust requires effort.

Voting is a privilege, really.  I think the Constitution addresses a number of issues relating to voting, but IIRC, it does not call it a right.

There's such a thing as buy-in.  If I have to make an effort to vote, I'm going to care so much about the issues at stake that I am willing to sacrifice time and effort to make my voice heard.  I am going to have prepared myself knowledge-wise so that I understand the issues and have arrived at my decisions with thoughtfulness.

If it is too easy to vote, flipping the lever or making the mark could just be the result of whoever happened to Twitter or headline-glimpse someone into voting based on emotion of the moment, not thought and deliberation.

You can cry "disenfranchisement" all you want, but a country run by thoughtful, prepared voters willing to sacrifice some effort to vote is going to be more likely to create a society and culture more friendly to human flourishing for ALL.

Wipe off the voter rolls every 4 years. Asking voters to re-register once every 4 years is not a burden when it comes to caring about the Republic.

Excellent idea, really.  I've been contemplating asechrest's assertion that voting should be as effortless as possible.  I don't agree. It should be as robust as possible, and that doesn't usually happen with "easy."