PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: nddons on November 18, 2016, 07:31:16 PM
-
And she said TRUMP wasn't fit to be near the nuclear codes?
http://yournewswire.com/drunk-hillary-voilence-bill-clinton-election-night/
-
Sooner or later some of those abused people are going to write tell-all books.
But nothing is more satisfying than seeing all of them out of a job.
-
Interesting exchange between commenters on an American Thinker post. I am really glad Trump doesn't drink. :)
ArmyAviator AtomicIgor
10 hours ago
As you know, being a pilot yourself, pilots like to talk to each other. I had the opportunity a few weeks ago to speak with a pilot from the NY air-charter service that mostly flew CrooKed Hillary and her band of cutthroats, during both the Primary and early in the General (until they leased the 737). According to my colleague, whom I will not ID, she consumed a particular brand of Single Malt Scotch, in copious quantities! Per FAR, cabin crews are not supposed to serve obviously drunken passengers. But, of course, that didn't apply to CrooKed Hillary. My colleague was disgusted with her behavior on his aircraft, her tirades when the Scotch ran out, on and on. She is a real piece of work. I'm so thankful, that our country will not have to suffer a regime headed by CrooKed Hillary and her cabal of Liberal Socialist sycophants.
ArmyAviator AtomicIgor
Just think, if the PIAPS had become president and had a meltdown over something that happened in say North Dakota! She might have used the nuclear codes, to A-bomb her own country! All in a drunken rage!
AtomicIgor ArmyAviator
Yeah! Of course, with all the concurrences that must be granted down the chain of command before a launch order can be executed, she might well not have been able to get a clearly inappropriate launch order to be obeyed.
What is more worrying to me is that, in a drunken fit, she might have painted herself into some corner that she wouldn't have been able to get out of without either attacking somebody (say, Russia) or losing a lot of national prestige. This is the first time in my lifetime that the more bellicose candidate was the DemonRat.
Bach2pilot ArmyAviator
I have some buddies who flew her on AF1. Every one of them said that Willy was cool but she was a B(witch) on wheels!
-
And she said TRUMP wasn't fit to be near the nuclear codes?
http://yournewswire.com/drunk-hillary-voilence-bill-clinton-election-night/
What's with linking to web sites of dubious authenticity? I mean, I realize traditional news media have lost a bit of credibility, but I'm not sure how that makes these stories that contain zero verifiable facts more than an amusing waste of time? I thought that was the point of Pilot Spin!? Don't make me cut out the middle-man (this site) and go straight to the dubious news sites - they at least have plenty of ads showing cleavage to make the trip kind of worth while.
-
Well, that's a problem we face.
What to do? Should Pilot Spin publish an accepted list of sites for linking?
Banning dubious (fake?) new sites requires someone to decide what is fake or dubious, but that smells like tyranny and rule by propaganda, which is part of what people are rising up against. And as we know, sites like Politifact and Snopes are biased. Every viewpoint is biased.
We mostly try here to sift out the silliest stuff, but occasionally we don't. I think we usually know when we push the dubious envelope.
We need, perhaps, a DARPA-like challenge to the best and brightest to bring the Media Problem into some kind of unifyingly acceptable state.
Not this lady, though:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-18/meet-leftist-professor-who-wrote-hit-list-fake-news-sites
-
What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?