Pilot Zone > Pilot Zone

IRS Agent Killed at Gun Range by Another Agent

(1/7) > >>

nddons:
This is a conflicting article. In one case it says they the IRS CID had 3,000 agents, but later on says they plan to have 70,000 armed agents.

I need to look into this.

It’s bullshit.

https://thepostmillennial.com/irs-agent-accidentally-shoots-kills-another-agent-at-phoenix-gun-range?utm_campaign=64483

Rush:
How do you accidentally shoot someone at the range?  Not practice basic gun safety?

Lucifer:

--- Quote from: Rush on August 18, 2023, 04:33:41 PM ---How do you accidentally shoot someone at the range?  Not practice basic gun safety?

--- End quote ---

  It's a government operation.

President-Elect Bob Noel:

--- Quote from: Rush on August 18, 2023, 04:33:41 PM ---How do you accidentally shoot someone at the range?  Not practice basic gun safety?

--- End quote ---

(I haven’t read the article yet)

But to address your question, it’s kind of hard to accidentally shoot anyone or anything, emphasis on accidentally rather than negligent discharge.

Mechanical failure coupled with richocet could be one way.  Hard to think of a valid accidental shooting scenario

President-Elect Bob Noel:

--- Quote from: nddons on August 18, 2023, 03:03:11 PM ---This is a conflicting article. In one case it says they the IRS CID had 3,000 agents, but later on says they plan to have 70,000 armed agents.

I need to look into this.

It’s bullshit.

https://thepostmillennial.com/irs-agent-accidentally-shoots-kills-another-agent-at-phoenix-gun-range?utm_campaign=64483

--- End quote ---

It might not be conflicting if the 70,000 number includes IRS agents that are not part of the 3000 IRS CID agents.

(I don't know if that is true, just speculating a way for it not to be a counting problem)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page