511
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Life requires food, water, clothing and shelter so that means government should provide them.Exactly. Rights are given by God and not by the government. Yes, we have a right to food, water, clothing, and shelter. And the government can't take those away. It is not the government's function to provide those things. Most leftists (and many on the Right) do not understand that the Constitution and Bill of Rights do not grant rights. They outline what the government can NOT do. For example, it's not a Constitutional right to free speech. We already have that right, granted by God. We have a Constitution that says the government can't take that right away. A very important difference.
Not my line of reasoning or one I agree with, but I've seen similar. The meaning of "rights" appears to have been altered by a lot of people to allow that kind of argument to appear valid.
...unalienable Rights, that among these are Life...Life requires food, water, clothing and shelter so that means government should provide them.
That and if that fails, war.
I rather agree, though I disagree on the government's ability to mandate a medical intervention like a vaccine. My reasoning is as follows: keeping the citizenry safe has ever been a function of government. We have a giant military to keep us safe from foreign invasion, the government should be able to take steps to limit our harm from a pestilential invasion. Governments have been doing this sort of thing for centuries trying to limit the impact of plagues. The word "quarantine" came from medieval Dubrovnik, whose city fathers decided that incoming sailors needed a period of isolation to ensure they didn't bring in the Black Plague. They isolated them on a nearby island for 40 days, the period of the biblical flood. 40, hence quarantine.
Was COVID sufficiently dangerous to warrant such a response? I'd argue it was, since it killed 1% of its victims and maimed many. You might argue otherwise, and that's fine. At the time it seemed plenty dangerous and threatened to collapse our medical system, indeed it nearly did so in many places. Thankfully the vaccines had high efficacy in preventing serious disease (the function of a vaccine, by the way) and the pandemic was largely halted.
Problem with natural immunity is you have to go through the disease to get it. That's an illness that kills 1% of its victims and maims upward of 30%. I'll take the vaccine, thank you.
https://www.secretservice.gov/about/faq/general
You are dissing vaccines, which were the only thing that stopped Polio. A bit of a conclusion on my part.
It's fascinating to watch a lot of this play out.
What it shows me is how shallow the establishment republicans are when it comes to candidates. RDS has fallen for this and jumped into bed with them, when IMO had he just sat out 2024 and kept the establishment at arm's length, he would have been better positioned for 2028.
And I agree with you, it would be bad for Youngkin to jump in the race at this time, especially with the backing of the establishment.
A scene from Oppenheimer