PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Lucifer on July 14, 2017, 09:00:02 AM

Title: More Judicial Activism
Post by: Lucifer on July 14, 2017, 09:00:02 AM
So the SC makes a ruling and this District Court Judge can over rule the President and the SC?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4695392/U-S-judge-narrows-travel-ban-defeat-Trump.html

Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: invflatspin on July 14, 2017, 09:18:35 AM
Because SCOTUS erred in legislating from the bench.
again...

Left a giant loophole that can be(will be, is being) politically exploited.
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: Anthony on July 14, 2017, 09:35:54 AM
Hawaii is probably are MOST liberal/progressive state.  I don't know why as I have never been there, but I assume it is because of the very large Asian population, and idyllic setting, but that is pure speculation.  Why is it the issues I want the Feds to stay out of Constitutionally, and the issues I want them to address within their right seems to never happen?
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: nddons on July 14, 2017, 11:46:24 AM
So the SC makes a ruling and this District Court Judge can over rule the President and the SC?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4695392/U-S-judge-narrows-travel-ban-defeat-Trump.html
I read that. Didn't you know that the Constitution is a living, breathing document, and if one judge believes it's the right thing to do, a single judge can become the Judicial branch and the Executive Branch of the federal government? 

Let's get with the program.

Fascism has now appeared in a black robe.
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: Anthony on July 14, 2017, 11:50:16 AM
Nearly half the Supreme Court believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document, and needs to be interpreted.  No.  It needs to be enforced, not interpreted with SJW goals in mind. 
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: nddons on July 14, 2017, 12:50:02 PM
Nearly half the Supreme Court believes the Constitution is a living, breathing document, and needs to be interpreted.  No.  It needs to be enforced, not interpreted with SJW goals in mind.
Hell, even John Fuckin' Roberts became the Legislative branch when he "interpreted" Obamacare's fines to be a tax.
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: LevelWing on July 16, 2017, 01:02:39 PM
Federal judges are subject to impeachment. I'm not sure if this rises to that level or not, but federal judges have been impeached before. Perhaps it's time for Congress to consider impeaching members of the judiciary who fail to uphold the rule of law. Here's a list of federal judges who have been impeached:

https://ballotpedia.org/Impeachment_of_federal_judges
Title: Re: More Judicial Activism
Post by: Number7 on July 16, 2017, 08:09:07 PM
IIRC correctly Albee Hastings is an impeached federal judge and now serves as a corrupt congressman.
The pigpen is full of pigs.