PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Jaybird180 on January 22, 2018, 12:56:21 PM

Title: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Jaybird180 on January 22, 2018, 12:56:21 PM
http://indalaw.com/news/view/22109/9th_circuit_upholds_prostitution_ban_in_constitutional_challenge.html

I read another article in the Washington Post about this but unfortunately cannot find it, which outlined the case for and against and why this matter is complex for Constitutional Law. It mentioned this case potentially being argued before SCOTUS.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Number7 on January 22, 2018, 02:25:32 PM
Since so many prostitution rings are intimately involved in sex slavery, forced sexual intercourse, brutality against women and young girls, dangerously involved in the transmission of sexually transmitted disease and a host of other crimes, including kidnapping, murder and, assault, I have no problem with this law.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Jaybird180 on January 23, 2018, 04:03:37 AM
Which is why I wish I could find the article. It outlined the argument that what we assume the benefit the law provides isn’t the truth of the matter. They argue that it simply criminalizes what’s going to happen anyway.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Little Joe on January 23, 2018, 06:50:45 AM
Since so many prostitution rings are intimately involved in sex slavery, forced sexual intercourse, brutality against women and young girls, dangerously involved in the transmission of sexually transmitted disease and a host of other crimes, including kidnapping, murder and, assault, I have no problem with this law.
Would it be like that if prostitution were legal?  Look at all the criminal activity that occurred due to prohibition.  And look at how full the jails are due to marijuana and other drug laws.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Number7 on January 23, 2018, 07:55:13 AM
Would it be like that if prostitution were legal?  Look at all the criminal activity that occurred due to prohibition.  And look at how full the jails are due to marijuana and other drug laws.

The market for UNDERAGE girls and boys for the sex trade is never going away, whether prostitution is legal or illegal.

The market for abusive sex is never going away, which means women and girls will continue to be beaten and abused to get perverts over the top.

The market for sex slaves is not going away. The black market sex slave trade is alive and well.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Little Joe on January 23, 2018, 08:11:32 AM
The market for UNDERAGE girls and boys for the sex trade is never going away, whether prostitution is legal or illegal.

The market for abusive sex is never going away, which means women and girls will continue to be beaten and abused to get perverts over the top.

The market for sex slaves is not going away. The black market sex slave trade is alive and well.
All good points.

I am currently reading "Power and Empire", (A Tom Clancy spin-off by Marc Cameron) which talks about some of the topics you mention. 
Disgusting.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Number7 on January 23, 2018, 08:13:25 AM
All good points.

I am currently reading "Power and Empire", (A Tom Clancy spin-off by Marc Cameron) which talks about some of the topics you mention. 
Disgusting.

Case in point.

http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/child-like-sex-dolls-designed-keep-pedophiles-offending/ (http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/child-like-sex-dolls-designed-keep-pedophiles-offending/)
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Little Joe on January 23, 2018, 08:19:26 AM
Case in point.

http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/child-like-sex-dolls-designed-keep-pedophiles-offending/ (http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/child-like-sex-dolls-designed-keep-pedophiles-offending/)
I kind of wish you didn't post that.  It falls under the category "sad but true".
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Number7 on January 23, 2018, 08:46:09 AM
I kind of wish you didn't post that.  It falls under the category "sad but true".

It fits right alongside the freak show that is the new transgender movement.

I am convinced this sudden obsession with trannies is to pave the way to run the tranny that calls himself Michelle Obama to run for office.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Anthony on January 23, 2018, 08:51:12 AM
It fits right alongside the freak show that is the new transgender movement.

I am convinced this sudden obsession with trannies is to pave the way to run the tranny that calls himself Michelle Obama to run for office.

If you oppose Michelle Obama you are racist, sexist, AND LGBTxyzPHOBIC!  She covers all the media bases.  The fact that Valerie Jarrett moved into their D.C. home speaks volumes.  While Michelle is occupied with Valerie, Barack can spend quality time with Richard Branson.  :)
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Jaybird180 on January 23, 2018, 01:00:21 PM
I am convinced this sudden obsession with trannies is to pave the way to run the tranny that calls himself Michelle Obama to run for office.
You really believe this or just to get a laugh?

If you oppose Michelle Obama you are racist, sexist, AND LGBTxyzPHOBIC!  She covers all the media bases.  The fact that Valerie Jarrett moved into their D.C. home speaks volumes.  While Michelle is occupied with Valerie, Barack can spend quality time with Richard Branson.  :)
Elaborate on the deal with Jarrett. I'm unfamiliar.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Anthony on January 23, 2018, 01:51:04 PM
Elaborate on the deal with Jarrett. I'm unfamiliar.

Jarrett is a long time "mentor" to Barack, and Michelle.  She is basically their "svengali", and severely controls them.  She basicially ran the White House, and the Obamas for eight years.  The rumor is that she has a sexual relation with Michelle, and that Barack is possibly Gay, or Bi.  At the very least, the relationship is a REALLY strange one.   
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Lucifer on January 23, 2018, 01:55:22 PM
Jarrett is a long time "mentor" to Barack, and Michelle.  She is basically their "svengali", and severely controls them.  She basicially ran the White House, and the Obamas for eight years.  The rumor is that she has a sexual relation with Michelle, and that Barack is possibly Gay, or Bi.  At the very least, the relationship is a REALLY strange one.

 It gets better.  Valerie and her husband moved in with the Obama's in their DC mansion.  Jarrett has to be that close and controlling to actually have to live in the same house with BHO.   Weird.

 Maybe Valerie has a Wookie fetish as well..........
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on January 23, 2018, 02:25:48 PM
It gets better.  Valerie and her husband moved in with the Obama's in their DC mansion.  Jarrett has to be that close and controlling to actually have to live in the same house with BHO.   Weird.

 Maybe Valerie has a Wookie fetish as well..........

Jarrett was only married a few years then divorced,prior to BHO admin,  never remarried.

Wookie brought WookieMama into the White House to live off the taxpayers.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Lucifer on January 23, 2018, 02:28:16 PM
Jarrett was only married a few years then divorced,prior to BHO admin,  never remarried.

Wookie brought WookieMama into the White House to live off the taxpayers.

OK, I misread the article, I assumed she was still married.
Title: Re: The 9th Circuit's view on Sex for Pay
Post by: Lucifer on January 23, 2018, 02:31:27 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4271412/Obama-confidante-Valerie-Jarrett-moves-Kaloroma-home.html