16
Spin Zone / Re: Under oath True the Vote claims to have no evidence in GA case
« on: February 19, 2024, 06:09:07 AM »The problem is the usage of the term “fraud”. The lay definition is not the strict professional definition. Lay people use the term to refer to any interference in the election process with intent to manipulate the outcome. Peter wants to limit it to the legal definition. I can understand where he’s coming from because I do the exact same thing with the term “abortion”.
The term “abortion” differs between lay usage and the actual correct professional definition, in this case the medical profession. The correct definition is simply the termination of a pregnancy, without reference to how it was terminated. It could be Mother Nature all by herself. Lay people call this a miscarriage but the medically correct term is “spontaneous abortion”.
But in common lay usage, abortion means induced abortion, specifically while the baby is still alive, and for the express purpose of deliberately terminating an otherwise viable pregnancy. This misuse of the word results in all kinds of problems.
Likewise the misuse of the term “fraud” also seems to be causing problems, such as endless bickering on this forum.
I understand what you're saying. However, this entire thread is merely an attempt to MINIMIZE and DIMINISH the stealing of an election through malevolent and illegal means. It has undermined the very foundation upon which this former country stood.