But now you imply that it is Republican’s fault? 

You cannot twist this. You have been absent for years while the debt was run up, you cannot legitimately protest now.

You’ve misread what I wrote.

Both parties are to blame.  And my retort was addressed to the communist progressive who implied this was getting worse because of republican policies.  Bullshit on that!  And even though BHO ran up more debt than all of his predecessors before him, don’t forget he had a congress of both D’ and R’s more than willing to help him. 

Even if the Republican Congress and the POTUS decided to get control, at this point, the progressives would go into a meltdown. 

There is no winning on this. The only way out is to cut SPENDING, that’s been the problem all along.

At least on the POTUS level there is positive spending cuts ongoing cutting back on bureaucracies.

Yup, and the GOP wants to make it worse.

While that makes you feel better, the reality is both parties have blame in this.

 If the measures were taken to actually cut the debt and bring spending under control the progressives would go into a meltdown.

So what exactly did Trump supposedly do to end up on a list with Bill Cosby?

Get accused.  If one is an "R", the accusation is then "guilty as charged".   If it's a progressive, and there is evidence, then it becomes they are either an icon or "that was long ago, we should just move on".

The D's opened Pandora's box.

The "D's" (more appropriately progressives) have always felt entitled and believed they had the high morality.  They pushed the agenda that only those despicable conservatives were mouth breathing lecherous sexual predators. Their tried and true sex smear tactics have become very predictable.

 And of course, the coastal progressives try to convince us these predators (D) are actually "icons" and , well, geez..."they said they were sorry" or in the case of the rapist Bill Clinton "can't we move on, that was so long ago".

That article is flawed beyond belief. The Supreme Court is one of the main arguments people cited to electing Trump to begin with, and he was elected and seated Gorsuch. Now Pat Buchanan wants to use the same argument to get Roy Moore elected, and that's silly.

First, if Moore loses, the Senate will shift from 52-48 to 41-49 and since there are at least two Republican senators (Collins and Murkowski) who already have a tendency to vote against the Republicans to begin with, this isn't exactly a huge shift. Second, he argues that this will be critical to getting another justice, or perhaps more, seated on the bench. Gorsuch was confirmed with a 54-45 vote (source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/07/us/politics/gorsuch-confirmation-vote.html), which included Collins, Murkowski, and 3 Democrats. The fact that Grassley wants to get rid of the blue slip rule is evidence that Trump's nominees can get confirmed. Let's not forget that the election isn't even for a full term. The seat is up for actual election in 2020 which is almost a 100% bet that it'll go to a Republican if Jones wins.

While he mentions Thomas being confirmed, he fails to mention that he was confirmed by a Democratic controlled Senate.

He's trying to justify why an accused child molester should be elected to the U.S. Senate and attempting to provide Republicans with a justification to abandon their morality.

 You reply was going well until the last paragraph.  Yes the man has been accused in the media, not under any law. No law suit has been filed, no arrest has been made. It’s simply a 40 year old allegation with holes big enough to drive a Mack truck through.

The problem letting the establishment and progressives get away with this it will only intensify until they get control of the senate.  Once that happens the Presidents judicial picks will be stonewalled unless he puts a progressive in. The courts are already stacked with activist judges and the progressives are losing their minds knowing a Republican Senate, using the rules of Harry Reid are putting conservatives back on the courts.

 And it would be absolutely foolish to think a democratic controlled senate would ever approve a Trump conservative SC appointment.

Problem now with Alabama is a third candidate is going to do a write in campaign.  Of course he has no chance to win, but he will split the vote which could potentially give the election to the democrats.

Hopefully the voters in Alabama will see through the charades and shananigans and put a stop to this. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2017/11/27/ha-heres-what-mulvaney-told-cfpb-staffers-about-leandra-english-n2414655

The whole situation is making for a rather awkward environment at the agency, with English sending staffers a welcome back from the holiday email Monday morning, signing the email “acting director” while Mulvaney brought donuts to work.

He also told staffers they should not listen to English.

“Please disregard any instructions you receive from Ms. English in her presumed capacity as Acting Director,” Mulvaney told staffers in memo. “If you receive additional communications from her today… please inform the General Counsel.”

He, too, signed his email “acting director” and invited employees to stop in his office to “grab a donut.”