Lets see!  Machine counted once!  Hand counted!  Machine counted again!  Every suit rejected so far!  What is the over and under on the dismissal?

WTF does that have to do with exposing the names of voters?  Can you not stay on topic?  BTW, do you realize that before a ballot was counted the first time it could have been adjudicated and the vote changed without the voter even knowing it happened. Once adjudicated the original is gone. In Fulton county 103k+ of a batch of 116+ ballots were adjudicated.

We do disagree.  Please give us one quote, in context, where he incited anyone to resistance or insurrection.  Since you say that "pretty much everything" he said does this, it should be easy.

She can't

Yep. I can’t believe he’s back after Christmas, and he sounds virtually normal. He doesn’t sound tired, or sick, or even unenthusiastic. Yet the end is probably closer than we know.

He does have the coughing thing.  I wonder if they have a plan in place to continue on with the EIB after he's gone. I suspect the affiliates would not be happy with the continual stream of guest hosts.

I am not in favor of any objecting to electors when there is no evidence of fraud or other shenanigans.  However, the contexts were quite different.  Clinton wasn't claiming, falsely, that the election was stolen or that there was fraud.  Cruz, Hawley, and all the rest knew that there was no supportable challenge but they did it like any other craven politician for their own political profit.

Things are not over here in Georgia yet. There was a hearing last Friday concerning Fulton County not turning over ballots for analysis and ignoring open records requests.

separate from some fascist type behavior like trying to overturn the election

Who are you referencing?

Just so we understand that there is nothing political about NY reopening 

Parler is on the way back.

You are reading it incorrectly.  It says that removal requires impeachment and conviction.  It says nothing about about a time limit on the trial.  As there are other ramifications to being impeached and convicted, other than removal from office, the only logical interpretation is that the trial can happen after the perp has left office.  One has to read the Constitution as a whole, and not just cherry pick parts of it.  SCOTUS will do the former and very likely let Congress do as it will do with Trump.

How do you remove someone from an office they don't hold?