PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Rush on July 09, 2019, 10:43:05 AM

Title: Epstein
Post by: Rush on July 09, 2019, 10:43:05 AM
I was going to post this yesterday but never got around to it. But now Rush is talking about it. A couple of callers suggested it. 

What if they are going to offer Epstein a plea deal if he makes up some story about Trump. Is this whole thing just another scheme to target Trump?
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: nddons on July 09, 2019, 10:54:46 AM
I was going to post this yesterday but never got around to it. But now Rush is talking about it. A couple of callers suggested it. 

What if they are going to offer Epstein a plea deal if he makes up some story about Trump. Is this whole thing just another scheme to target Trump?
I think it is. That’s the only reason this is being raised. I won’t hold my breath that this investigation will implicate Slick Willy in human trafficking and statutory rape of girls at Epstein’s island. They will avoid everything  related to democrats. Guaranteed.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Rush on July 09, 2019, 10:59:48 AM
I think it is. That’s the only reason this is being raised. I won’t hold my breath that this investigation will implicate Slick Willy in human trafficking and statutory rape of girls at Epstein’s island. They will avoid everything  related to democrats. Guaranteed.

Yep, if it comes down that way it will be one more case of the world turned completely upside down from reality.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on July 09, 2019, 06:44:47 PM
I was going to post this yesterday but never got around to it. But now Rush is talking about it. A couple of callers suggested it. 

What if they are going to offer Epstein a plea deal if he makes up some story about Trump. Is this whole thing just another scheme to target Trump?
Interesting as that is exactly what I Tweeted to Bo Snerdly yesterday.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Anthony on July 09, 2019, 06:50:54 PM
Every mainstream media outlet is showing pictures of Epstein with Trump, and linking them.  No mention of Slick Willy. 
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on July 10, 2019, 05:15:10 AM
Every mainstream media outlet is showing pictures of Epstein with Trump, and linking them.  No mention of Slick Willy.
What else would we have expected. I'm sure they've all told the story of Trump banning Epstein from Mar-A-Lago.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Little Joe on July 10, 2019, 05:34:30 AM
I have heard various reports on the MSM regarding this.  At best, they mention that both Trump and Clinton know Epstein and occasionally flew on his planes. 

Rarely (if ever) did they mention that Trump banned Epstein from his club.

And the MSM isn't touching this (from FOX):

Quote
Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.

Clinton has admitted to four flights, and that is what the MSM reports.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Anthony on July 10, 2019, 06:01:18 AM
What else would we have expected. I'm sure they've all told the story of Trump banning Epstein from Mar-A-Lago.

The media is utterly DISHONEST.  Yesterday, the local NBC affiliate had a story on our state buying new voting machines to the tune of several million dollars.  Our far left, Democrat Governor is behind this and NBC repeated HIS LIE as if it were FACT, saying the new voting machines are necessary due to the Russian hacking in he past Presidential election. 

So, let me understand this.  How can the voting machines be "hacked" if none of them are computerized, nor connected to the internet?
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Rush on July 10, 2019, 06:33:18 AM
Part of this I'm sure, is generational. Young voters and young reporters do not even remember Lewinski.  But Trump is in the present whether he did anything or not.  So Clinton's sexcapades are barely on their radar and Trump hate is ubiquitous.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: bflynn on July 10, 2019, 06:54:25 AM
I was going to post this yesterday but never got around to it. But now Rush is talking about it. A couple of callers suggested it. 

What if they are going to offer Epstein a plea deal if he makes up some story about Trump. Is this whole thing just another scheme to target Trump?

The connection between Trump and Epstein is tenuous at best.  It seems some very young entrepreneurs who worked at Mar-a-Lago performed sexual favors for Epstein in exchange for money to buy clothes and shoes (aka prostitution).  Additionally, one rich billionaire knows another rich billionaire.  There's only 607 of them, in the US, it makes total sense that they would know each other.

Which, in the deranged leftist mind, of course means that Trump is at fault for all of it right?  And probably participated if he didn't arrange it all.  In fact, I bet it was all Trump's idea to grab them in the p***y and now Epstein is just the fall guy.  Typical bad orange man, he ought to be impeached.

Wait, it's coming...
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: bflynn on July 10, 2019, 07:01:02 AM
The media is utterly DISHONEST.  Yesterday, the local NBC affiliate had a story on our state buying new voting machines to the tune of several million dollars.  Our far left, Democrat Governor is behind this and NBC repeated HIS LIE as if it were FACT, saying the new voting machines are necessary due to the Russian hacking in he past Presidential election. 

So, let me understand this.  How can the voting machines be "hacked" if none of them are computerized, nor connected to the internet?

Well, there is actually a way.  It was demonstrated that it's possible to tamper with a machine to make it count votes in a slanted way and it doesn't take that long.  But the list of people who know how to do that is extremely small.

The actual method involves accessing the USB port on the voting machine, which is just a computer.  Apparently the companies building them were frequently leaving the ports open on the assumption that nobody knew to do anything.  But when you insert a usb stick, it automatically ran what is was the drive and if you know something about  their software, you could rewrite a portion of the code to slant votes your way. 
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Anthony on July 10, 2019, 07:24:30 AM
Well, there is actually a way.  It was demonstrated that it's possible to tamper with a machine to make it count votes in a slanted way and it doesn't take that long.  But the list of people who know how to do that is extremely small.

The actual method involves accessing the USB port on the voting machine, which is just a computer.  Apparently the companies building them were frequently leaving the ports open on the assumption that nobody knew to do anything.  But when you insert a usb stick, it automatically ran what is was the drive and if you know something about  their software, you could rewrite a portion of the code to slant votes your way.

True.  All of the voting machines I have used have been mechanical with no computer interface, but that may be changing.  I do know of another district that uses paper ballots which are then "scanned" into a computer to tally the votes, so that maybe what you are referencing. 

There was an allegation in past elections that the straight Republican votes were being changed to Democrat, and to not vote straight ticket, but mark off each candidate Republican. 
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: bflynn on July 10, 2019, 11:58:35 AM
True.  All of the voting machines I have used have been mechanical with no computer interface, but that may be changing.  I do know of another district that uses paper ballots which are then "scanned" into a computer to tally the votes, so that maybe what you are referencing. 

There was an allegation in past elections that the straight Republican votes were being changed to Democrat, and to not vote straight ticket, but mark off each candidate Republican.

It is the counting machines that can be hacked.  Somewhere there's an article from a hackerfest where someone was smugly inviting just anyone to hack a voting machine.  Some stopped and did it in mere minutes and the guy was floored.  Guess it was true, they put it on the internet.  Can't put it on the internet if it isn't true, right?

Insert Stalin quote about counting votes.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Lucifer on July 13, 2019, 06:17:37 AM
(https://i1.wp.com/hardnoxandfriends.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/f12.jpeg?w=635)
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Anthony on July 13, 2019, 06:30:50 AM
^^^^Yet we only see 25 - 30 year old pictures of Epstein with Trump in the MEDIA, even though Trump banned Epstein from Maralago in 2011.

I try to watch a little of my local news just to see all the murders in North and West Philly every night.  So, the NBC affiliate said, as fact, the reason that our Democrat Governor is spending Millions on new voting machines was "Russian Hacking that influenced the last election".  Stated as fact no "alleged" thrown in. 

Then I switched to the local CBS affiliate only to see very old pictures of Trump with Epstein plastered all over the screen.  Nothing showing Clinton or other Dems.  Obviously, associating Trump with Epstein in a false manner as it was so long ago.  Total "guilt by association" with provocative statements about their "relationship".  Totally biased and irresponsible, but that is the Media in which we have. 
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Lucifer on July 13, 2019, 07:59:59 AM
They (leftist and MSM) got their first victim.  Sad part is that Acosta wasn’t the only prosecutor involved.  The other prosecutors (dims) got their pass. 

This is nothing more than what we’ve been watching since Trump took office, the leftist taking aim at anyone and everyone who serves or may want to serve in the administration.  Pure harassment and threats, as well as destroying reputation and careers. 
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on July 13, 2019, 08:09:15 AM
Shocked and appalled. Local guy, 39, pillar of community and fourth generation co-owner of respected family business in my town, arrested this week after lengthy FBI and local law enforcement investigation. Two counts of making and two counts of distributing child porn. Used computer equipment at the family business. Porn showed children as young as two years old being raped by adults.

Pure evil. And I know this guy through being a customer at his store. Nicest guy ever, I’d have said.

What is with people like this? Just pure evil.
Title: Re: Epstein
Post by: Rush on July 13, 2019, 10:07:26 AM
Shocked and appalled. Local guy, 39, pillar of community and fourth generation co-owner of respected family business in my town, arrested this week after lengthy FBI and local law enforcement investigation. Two counts of making and two counts of distributing child porn. Used computer equipment at the family business. Porn showed children as young as two years old being raped by adults.

Pure evil. And I know this guy through being a customer at his store. Nicest guy ever, I’d have said.

What is with people like this? Just pure evil.

Agree, pure evil. I draw a distinction between men who rape 2 year olds, and men who pay 14 year old runaways money for sex. That's basically prostitution. It's a voluntary transaction other than if you want to say you cannot voluntarily consent until you reach the magical age of 18. Not talking about kidnapping and selling into sexual slavery, I'm talking about teens voluntarily trading sex for money they want for drugs or whatever. Sex with a girl who has grown breasts and started periods and accepts lots of cash for it is not the same category as someone who rapes toddlers. Not saying it's right mind you!!!  Just not the same level of evil. I have a bit of a problem with equating the two because it dilutes the evil of the ones who rape the tiny ones. There is a categorical difference between true pedophilia and taking advantage of underaged adolescents. Both are wrong, but the one is so much more.