So you're too slow to keep up?
Just having to deal with a guy that is bipolar in his rantings and diatribes. Constant moving target and incoherent babbling that you're known for.
Writing off the cuff, so I might miss something: There is distrust of the process. Poll workers did not follow procedures and in some cases did not follow laws.
So how was a vote certified if laws weren't followed?
There are questions about the legitimacy of ballots that cannot be answered one way or another.
Yet, the results were certified, again, against the present laws. Before Jan 6th you kept rejecting the premise anything was wrong. Several lawsuits were filed on that very issue, and you claimed ceaselessly there was no evidence.
There are no standards for certifying an election, leaving it to the personal biases of the certifying official. There are no laws that state the certifying official must ensure procedures were followed.
No that's laughable on it's face, and quite dishonest. You simply can't be as ignorant as you continue to act.
But ultimately the law prevails...we are nation run by laws. The officials responsible to do so certified the elections as they are authorized to do by law.
OK Mr. BiPolar, here you go again ping ponging the other way. Can you not keep a coherent train of thought going?
It was done in a very sloppy manner. There's no penalties for workers who are sloppy and no standards for officials to decide not to certify an election.
Yes there are. Apparently you've never bothered to even look at the facts. Another laughable assertion.
There is distrust of multiple aspects of the election and those things can be changed to tighten things up.
But yet before Jan 6th you couldn't see an issue.
Let's cut to the chase. You got the result you desired with this sham election. Now that your guy is getting in the WH, you want to "fix" the election problems. But you simply can't realize that the people who perpetrated this crap on the American people are about in no way going to give up the keys on something that worked so brilliantly. Why should they? This firmly solidifies a one party rule they have been aspiring to for the past 50 years. And now they have precedence by having the courts back them up.
This was not a one election issue, and this was not about Trump. Pandora's box has been opened.
Was there intent to slant the election? I don't know, but some people believe there was. However, the intent cannot be proven. So we cannot include intent because it can't be determined. I'm sure you THINK you know intent, but you can't even identify an individual, how can you determine intent?
With our judicial system refusing to look at it, and our investigative agencies refusing to investigate, it's left to the citizens. And those who seek answers are demonized and smeared by the DCP and their media propaganda machine. The DCP are now in complete control of the judicial and the intelligence community and the investigative arm of our government. Do you really believe they want any transparency? C'mon.
Or you can can continue to bitch about the past like Republicans always do and in two years, you'll be right back here still outraged that they stole the election again.
Go back to 2016 and read the threads were I firmly asserted I am not a member of the republican party.
Finally, the DCP needs their useful idiots, and you and them handed them a dream come true. Be careful what you wish for, and that short term gain you wanted (get Trump out) has essentially destroyed our republic and trashed our constitution.
Useful idiot indeed.