PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: bflynn on January 24, 2018, 04:27:47 AM
-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/19/harvard-professor-newsweek-mocked-for-claims-clinton-can-still-become-president.html
An outlandish idea of how Hillary could still be president. He is technically correct, but he fails on so many levels
1) there is no evidence anywhere except in his mind that the election was "stolen".
2) there is no evidence that Congress would remove the president from office even it there were
3) there is no evidence that the president would resign
4) assuming Trump was removed from office, there is no evidence that Pence would either resign or be impeached.
5) assuming Pence was removed, there is absolutely no reason Ryan would appoint Hillary as VP.
6) assuming he did appoint Hillary, there is no reason for him to betray his party and quit in the name of "fair"
A year later and they are still in denial. Have they stopped teaching critical anaylsis at Harvard?
-
They’ve changed from critical thinking to crayons and play-doh at Harvard.
-
Pretty outlandish thinking, none of those things have even a remote possibility of happening. Maybe the Professor was just thinking outside the box?
-
Pretty outlandish thinking, none of those things have even a remote possibility of happening. Maybe the Professor was just thinking outside the box?
I'm trying to go with "he was demonstrating how ridiculous the idea of Hillary being president now is", except he seemed so sincere and serious about it.
-
Seems closer to delusion than denial. Sheesh.