PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on March 25, 2018, 06:43:13 AM

Title: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 25, 2018, 06:43:13 AM
The newest drama queen being used to take down President Trump is basically nothing but a hooker.

Porn 'stars' take money to engage in sex. That is the most basic definition of a prostitute and a congressman.

What is the actual point of this hit piece by CBS?

I concede that Donald Trump is heterosexual, unlike his immediate predecessor. So why the drama?

I'll admit he might, or might not have had an affair while married to the sensational Melania. Didn't the slime of the left tell us that we were not allowed to consider Bill Clinton's misdeeds when examining him for office?

What changed?

I am fully aware that Donald Trump does attract lovely, talented and amazingly intelligent women - and - the occasional whore like Stormy Daniels. So what?

Why were we not allowed to measure Clinton beside the same stick?

When I look at the media's obsession with putting this whore on display to tell us all Donald Trump's sexual orientation, I am confused as to its relevance.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 25, 2018, 07:20:36 AM
Stormy Daniels is setting herself up for retirement.  She has garnered fame of which she never had as a “performer”.  She’s strictly in this for the money.

And her attorney? He’s a well known democrat operative.  What does that tell you?
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Anthony on March 25, 2018, 07:55:40 AM
Another bleach blonde with DD implants looking for a bigger pay day.  Guess as she ages, she can't get the "escort" gigs she was getting before.  Sorry, you're getting old Stormy, and made ALL the wrong choices, and decisions in life. 
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: nddons on March 25, 2018, 08:46:10 AM
Another bleach blonde with DD implants looking for a bigger pay day.  Guess as she ages, she can't get the "escort" gigs she was getting before.  Sorry, you're getting old Stormy, and made ALL the wrong choices, and decisions in life.
I’ve never seen her skill sets in action on video, but if I saw her in a bar (and was unmarried) I would walk right past her as being just another ditsy lounge lizard looking for a sugar daddy.

Brunettes seem to have all the brains anyway.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 25, 2018, 10:09:26 AM
I’ve never seen her skill sets in action on video, but if I saw her in a bar (and was unmarried) I would walk right past her as being just another ditsy lounge lizard looking for a sugar daddy.


I'd drill her like a west Tex desert. Then I'd drop a $20, and ask for some change. ;)
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: nddons on March 25, 2018, 10:24:57 AM
I'd drill her like a west Tex desert. Then I'd drop a $20, and ask for some change. ;)
You’d need the change to pay for the penicillin. 
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 25, 2018, 11:49:57 AM
I watched one of her “performances”.

Typical raunch porn.   
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 25, 2018, 12:20:03 PM
You’d need the change to pay for the penicillin.

So a 3 condom job? just in case. hehe
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: bflynn on March 25, 2018, 01:30:31 PM
if I saw her in a bar (and was unmarried) I would walk right past her as being just another ditsy lounge lizard looking for a sugar daddy.

I'm just curious - by what signal would you know that she was looking for a sugar daddy?  Most single women in bars are probably at least open to meeting someone, what gives her away as looking for an older rich guy?

I'm pretty sure that when you were single, if a young woman smiled at you in a bar, then the last thing on your mind would have been that she was looking for a sugar daddy.

Personally, I'm just thinking that you are trying to inflate your morality by rejecting a porn star, but I'm not sure how you would know that either.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 25, 2018, 04:56:42 PM
People can say whatever they like about David Hogg and Stormy Daniels but they are both tools of the democratic party, being used to demonize President Donald Trump.

Daniels is a whore, plain and simple. having sex on film for money is the same as having sex for money. In the end, she's for sale for money and as I understand it, CBS paid plenty for this whore.

Like all prostitutes, this one will leave those who hired her feeling unsatisfied in the end.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 25, 2018, 05:01:02 PM
Well, I don't know if I'm the only one - but pretty much every time I've left a hooker, I've been plenty satisfied. Good value for money paid.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: nddons on March 26, 2018, 07:43:55 AM
I'm just curious - by what signal would you know that she was looking for a sugar daddy?  Most single women in bars are probably at least open to meeting someone, what gives her away as looking for an older rich guy?

I'm pretty sure that when you were single, if a young woman smiled at you in a bar, then the last thing on your mind would have been that she was looking for a sugar daddy.

Personally, I'm just thinking that you are trying to inflate your morality by rejecting a porn star, but I'm not sure how you would know that either.
Whatever you say, Flynn.

I think I have a good disease-bearing skank radar, but apparently you aren’t similarly burdened by such standards.  Good luck at the clinic. Nothing says “forever” like herpes.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 26, 2018, 07:45:14 AM
Don't care about the affair, its the cover up.  Two words.  Campaign finance.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Little Joe on March 26, 2018, 08:00:45 AM
Covereing up an affair is not the same as covering up a Federal crime.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 26, 2018, 08:13:38 AM
Don't care about the affair, its the cover up.  Two words.  Campaign finance.

Hypocrisy fits liberals so perfectly.

After all the rage and shrieking about how nobody has the right to judge Bill Clinton affairs, progressive assholes are front and center demanding that we judge Donald Trump by what a hired whore has to say about him.

Whores and democrats. The gift that never goes away.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Anthony on March 26, 2018, 08:59:41 AM
Don't care about the affair, its the cover up.  Two words.  Campaign finance.

So where is the evidence of the cover up, and use of campaign funds.  Trump is a billionaire.  If this actually did occur, you think he would use traceable funds to shut her up.  She's and extortionist nothing more, and her claims may all be false.  She is a money grubbing whore, that is all. 
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 26, 2018, 09:23:07 AM
Another sex smear absent of any evidence.   And brought to you by Democrat operatives.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: bflynn on March 26, 2018, 10:45:30 AM
Dems are talking themselves into a corner.  They commend the women for the sex-positive lifestyles, but condemn Donald Trump for being a part of it.  Of course we all know it's entirely because they have an irrational hatred of Trump, just like Republicans had an irrational hatred of Obama.

Still better than a chubby intern in the oval office.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 26, 2018, 11:07:55 AM
Perfect Liberal Logic....

The new york slimes reminding us why liberalism is a mental disorder.

Adultery is a private choice. The important rejection of it comes from love, not intimidation. The reason not to commit it is that it is likely to devastate someone you love if he or she learns about it. And the only way that person won't learn about it is if you tell a lot of lies. Telling a lot of lies eventually harms your ability to maintain a trusting relationship; secretiveness undermines intimacy. And tending a committed, intimate relationship is a deeply meaningful part of life, though we all know it has its share of bad days.

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/12/19/opinion/the-adultery-wars.html


https://www.dailywire.com/news/28662/flashback-msm-deemed-clinton-lewinsky-affair-joseph-curl
"High crimes? Or just a sex cover-up?" Time magazine wrote the next month.

That was the tack back then, after 50-year-old Bill Clinton was accused of having sex with a 22-year-old White House intern, often in the Oval Office. Clinton vehemently denied the allegation, wagging a crooked finger as he spat: “I want you to listen to me. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky. I never told a single person to lie, not a single time, never.”

Before the whole mess unraveled, Clinton also said: ''It is time to stop the pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives and get on with our national life."
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: nddons on March 26, 2018, 11:58:06 AM
I’m terribly concerned that the President that I voted for won’t be beatified and canonized as a saint by The Vatican upon his death.

Oh well, I’ll just have to accept that he’s helping make America great again.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 26, 2018, 12:40:33 PM
Hypocrisy fits liberals so perfectly.

After all the rage and shrieking about how nobody has the right to judge Bill Clinton affairs, progressive assholes are front and center demanding that we judge Donald Trump by what a hired whore has to say about him.

Whores and democrats. The gift that never goes away.

I'm told he's Number 7 because he liked to make 7 ice cubes at a time, at least before he lost the formula.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 26, 2018, 01:41:40 PM
I'm told he's Number 7 because he liked to make 7 ice cubes at a time, at least before he lost the formula.

You poor, demented, soul...

The world must have been an awful place once your mother kicked you off the tit and made you eat solid food, when you were seventeen.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Anthony on March 26, 2018, 11:15:35 PM
just like Republicans had an irrational hatred of Obama.
 

No, the media has an irrational hatred of Trump, and LOVED Obama.  Obama EARNED his hatred from Americans that respect the country, and the Constitution.  He lied about health care, shovel ready jobs, Benghazi, and he was racist.  He told me I was bitter, clinging to my guns and religion.

His wife was actually worse.   

Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Little Joe on March 27, 2018, 04:37:52 AM
, just like Republicans had an irrational hatred of Obama.

Still better than a chubby intern in the oval office.
Not exactly.  I had heard Obama's inaugural speech and thought he sounded like someone I could support.  So when he began campaigning for Democratic nomination, I bought his book to learn more about him.  THAT is when I developed a very RATIONAL dislike of all of his policies.  I didn't begin to dislike him personally until after he was elected.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: bflynn on March 27, 2018, 10:22:50 AM
She is a money grubbing whore, that is all.

Because don't believe in throwing unfounded accusations around - have I missed news that she is looking for a payout of this? 

I admit to rolling my eyes whenever I hear about it, so I'm not paying it any attention.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on March 27, 2018, 10:37:19 AM
Because don't believe in throwing unfounded accusations around - have I missed news that she is looking for a payout of this? 

I admit to rolling my eyes whenever I hear about it, so I'm not paying it any attention.

Then what is her motivation?
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 27, 2018, 11:57:39 AM
You poor, demented, soul...

The world must have been an awful place once your mother kicked you off the tit and made you eat solid food, when you were seventeen.

What's the difference between an astute Number 7 and a Unicorn?  None, both are imaginary.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 27, 2018, 11:59:30 AM
60 Minutes(TV) has a long history of denying payments to interview guests.

Which turn out to be one of those wink, wink, nod, nod things when a $8000 meal allowance, and a $200,000 travel allowance, and a $45,000 wardrobe budget are disclosed. These are a couple I recall from the flap with either Clinton bimbos, or the Rather dust up, or the Ford truck rollover michigoss. But - don't quote me because it may all be 'unfounded'. Who know what they gave the girl for her meals, travel, wardrobe? Half mil? Yes, rampant speculation - but, within budget for the ratings I would est.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 27, 2018, 12:38:21 PM
Because don't believe in throwing unfounded accusations around - have I missed news that she is looking for a payout of this? 


 C'mon, do you think she is doing this for nothing?   She just gave 60 minutes their highest rating in years, do you honestly think they just put out a cheese tray for their gratitude?

 She has a short window of opportunity to rake in the cash on this before it fizzles out.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 27, 2018, 12:45:01 PM
What's the difference between an astute Number 7 and a Unicorn?  None, both are imaginary.

Mike,

Can't your triple ZERO IQ come up with better than that?
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 27, 2018, 01:23:42 PM
Mike,

Can't your triple ZERO IQ come up with better than that?

How do you get Number 7 off his knees?



Ejaculate.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 27, 2018, 02:52:52 PM
'Cheese tray....'

I like that one. Maybe some Ritz crackers and a bottled water too.  8)
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 27, 2018, 06:19:17 PM
How do you get Number 7 off his knees?



Ejaculate.

Are you so pathetic that this is the best your triple digit IQ is capable of creating?

Surely you are not as pathetic, stupid, myopic and intellectually lazy as you seem.

Nah...

You probably are.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 28, 2018, 05:30:04 AM
Are you so pathetic that this is the best your triple digit IQ is capable of creating?

Surely you are not as pathetic, stupid, myopic and intellectually lazy as you seem.

Nah...

You probably are.

What would happen to Number 7 if he got Alzheimers?



His IQ would increase beyond his sobriquet.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 28, 2018, 05:45:17 AM
Must be spring break, no students to belittle or harass.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 28, 2018, 06:31:09 AM
Must be spring break, no students to belittle or harass.

His strap on is broken, so he has to take his gender confusion out on others...
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 28, 2018, 08:27:50 AM
His strap on is broken, so he has to take his gender confusion out on others...

What can strike Number 7 without him even knowing it?






A thought.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Anthony on March 28, 2018, 10:43:26 AM
Welcome back Michael.  :)

LOL! 
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 28, 2018, 06:58:17 PM
What can strike Number 7 without him even knowing it?
A thought.

Do you hire seven year old brats to write your material?

No wonder you students hate your fucking guts.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 28, 2018, 07:14:49 PM
Do you hire seven year old brats to write your material?

No wonder you students hate your fucking guts.
What’s the definition of perfect pitch?



you throw Number 7 in the dumpster so he doesn’t hit the sides...

or alternatively

you throw Number 7 into the dumpster so he lands on top of Lucifer...
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 28, 2018, 07:24:23 PM
Helplessly incompetent,combined with egomaniacal endencies define the pathetic,progressive, professor....
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: bflynn on March 28, 2018, 07:55:47 PM
Helplessly incompetent,combined with egomaniacal endencies define the pathetic,progressive, professor....

I can't even lol at that.  Wince maybe.

Please tell us you don't home school your children.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 29, 2018, 06:22:09 AM
Helplessly incompetent,combined with egomaniacal endencies define the pathetic,progressive, professor....

How do you confuse Number 7?

You don't.  He was born that way.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 29, 2018, 07:05:28 AM
Maybe you should have a professional check your psychotropic medications.

Something tells me you think you are a competent adult, instead of a gender confused, irrational, mental case.

Of course you did try and convince people that Sarah Palin said she could see Alaska from her house. And you do live in a progressive fantasy world where your opinions are law and the law is based on your opinions...
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: nddons on March 29, 2018, 07:51:05 AM
Course:

How to Quash Online Thread
Steingar, PhD

Text:

Alinsky, S. (1971).  Rules for radicals.  New York, N.Y.: Random House.

Assignment: 

Demonstrate how to quash a discussion by using Rule 13:  “Pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”  May also utilize Rule 5:  “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Steingar on March 29, 2018, 08:45:10 AM
Maybe you should have a professional check your psychotropic medications.

Something tells me you think you are a competent adult, instead of a gender confused, irrational, mental case.

Of course you did try and convince people that Sarah Palin said she could see Alaska from her house. And you do live in a progressive fantasy world where your opinions are law and the law is based on your opinions...

How do you make Number 7's eyes light up?




Shine a flashlight in his ear.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on March 29, 2018, 10:27:22 AM
How do you make Number 7's eyes light up?




Shine a flashlight in his ear.

My advice, keep your day job and leave the comedy for your fellow 4th Graders.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 29, 2018, 04:35:26 PM
Now the real story comes out:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5554437/Stormy-Daniels-tried-sell-story-sex-Trump-200-000-weeks-election.html

Quote
Stormy Daniels's manager offered her client's story to celebrity magazines, television shows and websites in the run-up to the 2016 election

The titillating tell all was peddled to the media around October 17, three weeks before the election

But the adult actress apparently had no takers as Hillary was expected to win at the time, and Stormy's story would have been worth a fraction of her asking price

Daniels then accepted the $130k from Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen, who had made her the offer after Trump won the nomination

'It looks to me that she accepted Cohen's money because she could not get the money she wanted from anyone else,' one media executive said

Daniels told her version of her tryst with Trump to Anderson Cooper on CBS's 60 Minutes on Sunday

Stormy made it seem as though she did not seek to sell her story, telling Cooper: 'Suddenly people are reaching out to me again, offering me money. Large amounts of money'
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 29, 2018, 07:12:56 PM
A whore is a whore is a whore...
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 30, 2018, 06:42:33 AM
That link from the Ramos thread has some interesting stuff.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2018/03/27/abcs-profile-porn-star-aspiring-journalist-equestrian

Read the comments. Some comedy gold in there.

Anyway, Cohen paying this porn actress anything was a critical mistake. It has the appearance of a pay-off to stay quiet. And, it didn't work. Cohen obviously doesn't know the first rule of prostitution; 'you don't pay them for the sex, you pay them to leave afterward.' He got neither the happy ending, or the leave later. Idiot.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 30, 2018, 07:28:52 AM
One comment that caught my attention was the one describing Porn as a Democrat Party operation that rejects all forms of morality, family and decency. If anything screams inside job, it's this pathetic group of 'journalists' attempting to mainstream a porn actress, turned stripper, who continues to fall from prominence and can't survive without the attention.

Pretty soon she'll be taking on all comers at the Dem convention, to raise money for the tranny who calls himself Michelle Obama and wants to be president.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 30, 2018, 07:35:34 AM
Can a Wookie actually qualify for the Presidency??
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 30, 2018, 07:40:06 AM
Can a Wookie actually qualify for the Presidency??

If an illegal alien from Kenya can, then a tranny, space alien can, as long as it runs as a democrat.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on March 30, 2018, 07:52:07 AM
Horrifyingly, it is likely Michelle will be put forward for 2020, I think.  She has an appealing last name, with all its wonderful associations and elicitations of worshipful adoration, and that name is all the left can scrape up out of its no-substance platform and weird, no-substance candidates. She will bring back the golden hope and change years that BHO delivered.



Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 30, 2018, 07:55:01 AM
Horrifyingly, it is likely Michelle will be put forward for 2020, I think.  She has an appealing last name, with all its wonderful associations and elicitations of worshipful adoration, and that name is all the left can scrape up out of its no-substance platform and weird, no-substance candidates. She will bring back the golden hope and change years that BHO delivered.

I completely disagree.

The guy who calls himself Michelle Obama has none of the fake likeability of the guy who pretends to be his husband.

Michael, as Barack referred to him, is about as genuine and palatable as Hilary, and as if it were possible, even less attractive.

She/he/it has none of the things going for he/she/it that Barack had, which allowed him to lie to everybody everywhere and get away with it.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Lucifer on March 30, 2018, 07:59:52 AM
Kamala Harris is lining up for 2020.

Being a black female the progressives get a twofer, anyone that criticizes her can be called a racist and a misogynist.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Number7 on March 30, 2018, 08:34:43 AM
Kamala Harris is lining up for 2020.

Being a black female the progressives get a twofer, anyone that criticizes her can be called a racist and a misogynist.

My money is on the fact that, other than make believe liberals, like Steingar, many folks are triggered by the utterly fake, racist dog-whistle that liberals blow all the time, these days.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: Anthony on March 30, 2018, 09:02:31 AM
Horrifyingly, it is likely Michelle will be put forward for 2020, I think.  She has an appealing last name, with all its wonderful associations and elicitations of worshipful adoration, and that name is all the left can scrape up out of its no-substance platform and weird, no-substance candidates. She will bring back the golden hope and change years that BHO delivered.
I doubt it.  The Obamas are all about wealth, and luxury.  They used Affirmative Action, and politics to gain that wealth.  Now that they have it, I don't think they want to go through the pain of a political campaign again.  They would rather frolic with Richard Branson, and live with Valerie Jarrett.

Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: invflatspin on March 30, 2018, 09:16:20 AM
If the DNC put up Hillary(kinda forced), they might just put up Michele. However, nothing would galvanize the right more than her, so that kind of baggage has to be taken into account. I see some of Hillary in Michele. They are both potentially likeable on the surface, but once you get through that, the core is pretty rotten.
Title: Re: I Don't Want to be too Hard on Her But...
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on March 30, 2018, 10:57:28 AM
I doubt it.  The Obamas are all about wealth, and luxury.  They used Affirmative Action, and politics to gain that wealth.  Now that they have it, I don't think they want to go through the pain of a political campaign again.  They would rather frolic with Richard Branson, and live with Valerie Jarrett.
or live with Branson and frolic with Jarrett.