1
PILOT SPIN
News:
Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
4 Likes
2
Spin Zone / Re: Should America Pursue a TWO STATE Solution???
« on: August 16, 2022, 05:53:31 AM »
To torture the analogy to death:
Suppose the right (producers) are the man and the left are the woman in an unhappy marriage. Suppose the man has a job but the woman sits around the house whining about unfairness and inequities. She eats the food the man pays for and turns up the heat when she is cold and the man pays the power bill. The woman lectures the man about the evils of fossil fuels after she cranks up the thermostat. She lectures him about fertilizer causing climate change while she drinks soy milk made from soybeans grown on industrialized U.S. farms, about which she is clueless.
Maybe she has a job but it doesn’t involve manufacturing, transportation or production. She writes editorials for an online rag on the subject of the oppressive patriarchy and gender inequality (she has a college degree in gender studies) and is praised by the other wives also sitting at home working safely by computer as their husbands go out and risk life and limb on farm equipment, on catwalks up around boilers, in train switch yards, on oil platforms, fishing vessels, road construction, basically everything needed to allow the women to sit comfortably at home complaining about toxic masculinity.
Of course this job doesn’t earn much compared to the man’s job. She uses this fact to howl about pay inequality while totally clueless that men get paid more because they do much riskier, more productive work than women, and this is by women’s choice.
The woman lectures the man about evil guns and how no one should be allowed to own them except police. If a criminal breaks into your home, call the police, that’s what they are there for. The woman goes into the bathroom and finds a huge cockroach in her bathtub. She screams and calls the man to come get the cockroach. The man tells her to call the pest company, they’ll come save her. It isn’t right for him to defend the home from intruders with violence himself, that’s what the pest company is for. Outraged, she yells at him until he caves and kills the bug. It is her right to use him for whatever she needs and he ends up allowing it.
Let’s suppose divorce is a bad thing in this fictional society. The man decides he has had enough of being used for support while not being appreciated and indeed constantly being criticized. What are his options? He could kill her. But that is too risky. If he is caught he goes to prison and loses everything. He can’t get a divorce, he can’t afford it and anyway it is highly stigmatized in this society.
There is only one remaining option. He has to man up: exert his authority. He has to lay down the law to the woman. He takes over the bank accounts and removes the computer he paid for that she uses to write hit pieces on men. No more criticizing men for being men while under his roof. No more endless spending on frivolous stuff using his money. He locks the thermostat where he thinks it should be. He demands home cooked meals when he gets home from work and from now on his shirts will be ironed. She will be supportive and appreciative of his production. If she doesn’t accept these terms she can go out and get a job working road construction, welding steam pipes on boilers or driving a truck. Otherwise he will kick her out of the house and let her live under a bridge. Still married but no longer draining the lifeblood out of him.
That is what the right needs to do. Establishment GOP is the cuck husband- it has allowed the growth of this malignant man-hatred, white race hatred and Marxist economics. It has bowed to it, compromised to it, taken kickbacks from it (sex? To further torture the analogy).
MAGA Republicans are waking up. Trump knew how to lay down the law. We are opening keystone. No, you can’t teach CRT. No you can’t come here illegally and live in our home without permission. And if I want to grab pussy I’ll grab pussy and you’ll like it. Ha!
But my analogy doesn’t hold if the woman can run to Big Government and cry domestic abuse! He wants me to iron shirts! Wah wah wah!! I was happy just living off his money, translate: the hours of his life spent working. He doesn’t like me hating his toxic masculinity! Wah wah wah!!! Make him pay! Destroy him financially! Ruin him emotionally!
The question is, can the male side of this prevail without resorting to violence? War? Divorce? Maybe so and it needs to be given every chance.
Suppose the right (producers) are the man and the left are the woman in an unhappy marriage. Suppose the man has a job but the woman sits around the house whining about unfairness and inequities. She eats the food the man pays for and turns up the heat when she is cold and the man pays the power bill. The woman lectures the man about the evils of fossil fuels after she cranks up the thermostat. She lectures him about fertilizer causing climate change while she drinks soy milk made from soybeans grown on industrialized U.S. farms, about which she is clueless.
Maybe she has a job but it doesn’t involve manufacturing, transportation or production. She writes editorials for an online rag on the subject of the oppressive patriarchy and gender inequality (she has a college degree in gender studies) and is praised by the other wives also sitting at home working safely by computer as their husbands go out and risk life and limb on farm equipment, on catwalks up around boilers, in train switch yards, on oil platforms, fishing vessels, road construction, basically everything needed to allow the women to sit comfortably at home complaining about toxic masculinity.
Of course this job doesn’t earn much compared to the man’s job. She uses this fact to howl about pay inequality while totally clueless that men get paid more because they do much riskier, more productive work than women, and this is by women’s choice.
The woman lectures the man about evil guns and how no one should be allowed to own them except police. If a criminal breaks into your home, call the police, that’s what they are there for. The woman goes into the bathroom and finds a huge cockroach in her bathtub. She screams and calls the man to come get the cockroach. The man tells her to call the pest company, they’ll come save her. It isn’t right for him to defend the home from intruders with violence himself, that’s what the pest company is for. Outraged, she yells at him until he caves and kills the bug. It is her right to use him for whatever she needs and he ends up allowing it.
Let’s suppose divorce is a bad thing in this fictional society. The man decides he has had enough of being used for support while not being appreciated and indeed constantly being criticized. What are his options? He could kill her. But that is too risky. If he is caught he goes to prison and loses everything. He can’t get a divorce, he can’t afford it and anyway it is highly stigmatized in this society.
There is only one remaining option. He has to man up: exert his authority. He has to lay down the law to the woman. He takes over the bank accounts and removes the computer he paid for that she uses to write hit pieces on men. No more criticizing men for being men while under his roof. No more endless spending on frivolous stuff using his money. He locks the thermostat where he thinks it should be. He demands home cooked meals when he gets home from work and from now on his shirts will be ironed. She will be supportive and appreciative of his production. If she doesn’t accept these terms she can go out and get a job working road construction, welding steam pipes on boilers or driving a truck. Otherwise he will kick her out of the house and let her live under a bridge. Still married but no longer draining the lifeblood out of him.
That is what the right needs to do. Establishment GOP is the cuck husband- it has allowed the growth of this malignant man-hatred, white race hatred and Marxist economics. It has bowed to it, compromised to it, taken kickbacks from it (sex? To further torture the analogy).
MAGA Republicans are waking up. Trump knew how to lay down the law. We are opening keystone. No, you can’t teach CRT. No you can’t come here illegally and live in our home without permission. And if I want to grab pussy I’ll grab pussy and you’ll like it. Ha!
But my analogy doesn’t hold if the woman can run to Big Government and cry domestic abuse! He wants me to iron shirts! Wah wah wah!! I was happy just living off his money, translate: the hours of his life spent working. He doesn’t like me hating his toxic masculinity! Wah wah wah!!! Make him pay! Destroy him financially! Ruin him emotionally!
The question is, can the male side of this prevail without resorting to violence? War? Divorce? Maybe so and it needs to be given every chance.
3
Spin Zone / Re: Covidiocy Continued
« on: October 25, 2021, 03:58:25 PM »
Who's on First?
Abbott & Costello, who for those old enough to know.....
Bud: I got my vaccination. I am now protected from the virus.
Lou: Not me. No one’s gonna jab a needle in my arm.
Bud: You must.
Lou: Why?
Bud: To protect me.
Lou: From the virus?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: But I thought you said you were vaccinated.
Bud: I am.
Lou: You’re protected?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: From the virus?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: So, I don’t need a vaccination.
Bud: But you do.
Lou: Why?
Bud: To protect me.
Lou: I thought you were vaccinated.
Bud: I am.
Lou: And the vaccination protects you?
Bud: It does.
Lou: So, I don’t need to get vaccinated to protect you because you’re already protected from the virus by the vaccination you already got.
Bud: No, you must get the vaccination to protect me from the virus.
Lou: You mean the vaccination doesn’t work?
Bud: It does work.
Lou: If the vaccination works and you’re protected from the virus because you already got the vaccination then it doesn’t matter if I don’t get vaccinated.
Bud: But it does matter. Because if you don’t vaccinated you can give me the virus.
Lou: Let me see if I have this straight.
Bud: Okay.
Lou: You got the vaccination?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: The vaccination protects you from the virus?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: So, it doesn’t matter if I don’t get the vaccination because you’re already protected from the virus?
Bud: No.
Lou: Are you telling me the vaccination doesn’t work?
Bud: No, I’m telling you the vaccination does work.
Lou: Then why must I get the vaccination?
Bud: To protect me from the virus.
Lou: This doesn’t makes any sense.
Bud: But it does make sense. Why don’t you understand? Besides, you are required to get the vaccination, whether you like it or not.
Lou: What?
Bud: Everyone in America must get the vaccination.
Lou: Everyone?
Bud: Everyone. Except for a few people.
Lou: Who?
Bud: Members of Congress.
Lou: Members of Congress?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: You’re telling me everyone in America must get the vaccination except Members of Congress?
Bud: And their staff.
Lou: Their staff don’t have to get the vaccination?
Bud: Nope.
Lou: Why are Members of Congress and their staff exempt?
Bud: Because the president needs Congress to pass his spending bills.
Lou: Oh, it’s a political favor.
Bud: Of course, it is.
Lou: So, everyone in America must get the vaccination except Members of Congress and their staff?
Bud: And postal workers.
Lou: What? Postal workers don’t have to get the vaccination?
Bud: That is correct.
Lou: I’m sure I don’t want to know, but please tell me why.
Bud: Because the postal workers union endorsed the president.
Lou: Their exemption was not based on a medical reason?
Bud: No.
Lou: Not based on science?
Bud: Not hardly.
Lou: The decision is based on who voted for which candidate?
Bud: Now, you get it!
Lou: The president gets to decide who must get vaccinated and who doesn’t?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Not a doctor, but the president decides?
Bud: That is correct.
Lou: Where does the president get his medical advice?
Bud: Probably from his wife.
Lou: Is she a doctor?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: That’s a relief.
Bud: But not a medical doctor.
Lou: She’s not a medical doctor?
Bud: No.
Lou: How many kinds of doctors are there?
Bud: Lots.
Lou: What kind of doctor is she?
Bud: E.D.
Lou: She has erectile dysfunction?
Bud: No. She has a doctorate in ED. Education.
Lou: She’s a school teacher?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: Do people call school teachers “doctor”?
Bud: Only her. And only on CNN.
Lou: The bottom line is the president gets his medical advice from his wife who is a doctor, but not a real doctor. She’s just a school teacher doctor, right?
Bud: Fauci.
Lou: Fauci? What’s a Fauci? Is that some kind of school teacher doctor?
Bud: Fauci is not a what, but a who.
Lou: Okay, who is Fauci?
Bud: He’s also advising the president.
Lou: Is he a medical doctor?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: That’s good news. So the president gets medical advice from his wife, who is not an actual doctor, and doesn’t know anything about medicine, and he also gets advice from a medical doctor. Does this medical doctor study viruses?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Great!
Bud: And helps create viruses.
Lou: Huh? What do you mean?
Bud: Fauci is the guy who runs the office that gave money to the Chinese lab that created the virus.
Lou: Fauci gave his money to the Chinese?
Bud: No, not his money. He gave taxpayer money.
Lou: Taxpayer money?
Bud: Yup.
Lou: So the American taxpayer paid to create the virus?
Bud: You, sir, are correct.
Lou: At least Fauci told us he was doing this.
Bud: He did not.
Lou: Nobody asked him?
Bud: Yes, they did. Under oath.
Lou: And he admitted he gave taxpayer money to the Chinese lab?
Bud: No, he said he didn’t.
Lou: If he swore under oath that he did not fund the Chinese lab then how did we find out he did?
Bud: We have the papers that proved Fauci did exactly what he claimed he didn’t do.
Lou: Isn’t it illegal to lie under oath?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Is Fauci gonna be charged with a crime?
Bud: No.
Lou: Why not?
Bud: Because some lies are good lies.
Lou: You mean like telling children there is a Santa Claus?
Bud: No, that’s an evil lie because it perpetuates the falsehood that a happily married, cisgender, white male does good deeds around the world. The good lies are the ones that support politically correct narratives, such as the Russians stole the 2016 election.
Lou: Let’s get back to the Chinese and their lab.
Bud: Okay.
Lou: The Chinese don’t like us, do they?
Bud: They do not.
Lou: And this Chinese lab is the place that could create the material used in biological weapons?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Why on earth would Fauci give them taxpayer money?
Bud: For science.
Lou: Let me get this straight. Vaccinations work because they protect us from the virus, but unvaccinated people must get vaccinated because they can give the virus to people who are already protected from the virus because they have been vaccinated, but the vaccinated can still catch the virus even though vaccinations work.
Bud: Precisely!
Lou: And the medical doctor advising the president is the one who gave American taxpayer money to the Chinese lab that created the virus that led to the global pandemic and he lied about doing this.
Bud: Now you got it.
Lou: Fauci must be the most hated man in America.
Bud: No, no. Fauci is beloved.
Lou: This doesn’t make any sense. Who loves him?
Bud: Politicians, news media, Hollywood, big tech, and government employees who get paid to stay home during lockdowns.
Lou: And the rest of America? The workers, entrepreneurs, first responders, farmers, tradesmen, factory workers, business owners, and families? Do they like Fauci?
Bud: Not in the slightest.
Lou: Let me get back to this. Everyone in America must get vaccinated except for Members of Congress, their staff, and members of the postal workers union.
Bud: And illegal immigrants.
Lou: Huh?
Bud: Illegal immigrants are exempt from getting vaccinations.
Lou: They belong to a union, too?
Bud: Don’t be silly.
Lou: Why are illegal immigrants exempt from getting vaccinations?
Bud: Because the president wants to immediately make them citizens so they can vote for him in 2024.
Lou: Is any of this legal?
Bud: No.
Abbott & Costello, who for those old enough to know.....
Bud: I got my vaccination. I am now protected from the virus.
Lou: Not me. No one’s gonna jab a needle in my arm.
Bud: You must.
Lou: Why?
Bud: To protect me.
Lou: From the virus?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: But I thought you said you were vaccinated.
Bud: I am.
Lou: You’re protected?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: From the virus?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: So, I don’t need a vaccination.
Bud: But you do.
Lou: Why?
Bud: To protect me.
Lou: I thought you were vaccinated.
Bud: I am.
Lou: And the vaccination protects you?
Bud: It does.
Lou: So, I don’t need to get vaccinated to protect you because you’re already protected from the virus by the vaccination you already got.
Bud: No, you must get the vaccination to protect me from the virus.
Lou: You mean the vaccination doesn’t work?
Bud: It does work.
Lou: If the vaccination works and you’re protected from the virus because you already got the vaccination then it doesn’t matter if I don’t get vaccinated.
Bud: But it does matter. Because if you don’t vaccinated you can give me the virus.
Lou: Let me see if I have this straight.
Bud: Okay.
Lou: You got the vaccination?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: The vaccination protects you from the virus?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: So, it doesn’t matter if I don’t get the vaccination because you’re already protected from the virus?
Bud: No.
Lou: Are you telling me the vaccination doesn’t work?
Bud: No, I’m telling you the vaccination does work.
Lou: Then why must I get the vaccination?
Bud: To protect me from the virus.
Lou: This doesn’t makes any sense.
Bud: But it does make sense. Why don’t you understand? Besides, you are required to get the vaccination, whether you like it or not.
Lou: What?
Bud: Everyone in America must get the vaccination.
Lou: Everyone?
Bud: Everyone. Except for a few people.
Lou: Who?
Bud: Members of Congress.
Lou: Members of Congress?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: You’re telling me everyone in America must get the vaccination except Members of Congress?
Bud: And their staff.
Lou: Their staff don’t have to get the vaccination?
Bud: Nope.
Lou: Why are Members of Congress and their staff exempt?
Bud: Because the president needs Congress to pass his spending bills.
Lou: Oh, it’s a political favor.
Bud: Of course, it is.
Lou: So, everyone in America must get the vaccination except Members of Congress and their staff?
Bud: And postal workers.
Lou: What? Postal workers don’t have to get the vaccination?
Bud: That is correct.
Lou: I’m sure I don’t want to know, but please tell me why.
Bud: Because the postal workers union endorsed the president.
Lou: Their exemption was not based on a medical reason?
Bud: No.
Lou: Not based on science?
Bud: Not hardly.
Lou: The decision is based on who voted for which candidate?
Bud: Now, you get it!
Lou: The president gets to decide who must get vaccinated and who doesn’t?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Not a doctor, but the president decides?
Bud: That is correct.
Lou: Where does the president get his medical advice?
Bud: Probably from his wife.
Lou: Is she a doctor?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: That’s a relief.
Bud: But not a medical doctor.
Lou: She’s not a medical doctor?
Bud: No.
Lou: How many kinds of doctors are there?
Bud: Lots.
Lou: What kind of doctor is she?
Bud: E.D.
Lou: She has erectile dysfunction?
Bud: No. She has a doctorate in ED. Education.
Lou: She’s a school teacher?
Bud: Correct.
Lou: Do people call school teachers “doctor”?
Bud: Only her. And only on CNN.
Lou: The bottom line is the president gets his medical advice from his wife who is a doctor, but not a real doctor. She’s just a school teacher doctor, right?
Bud: Fauci.
Lou: Fauci? What’s a Fauci? Is that some kind of school teacher doctor?
Bud: Fauci is not a what, but a who.
Lou: Okay, who is Fauci?
Bud: He’s also advising the president.
Lou: Is he a medical doctor?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: That’s good news. So the president gets medical advice from his wife, who is not an actual doctor, and doesn’t know anything about medicine, and he also gets advice from a medical doctor. Does this medical doctor study viruses?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Great!
Bud: And helps create viruses.
Lou: Huh? What do you mean?
Bud: Fauci is the guy who runs the office that gave money to the Chinese lab that created the virus.
Lou: Fauci gave his money to the Chinese?
Bud: No, not his money. He gave taxpayer money.
Lou: Taxpayer money?
Bud: Yup.
Lou: So the American taxpayer paid to create the virus?
Bud: You, sir, are correct.
Lou: At least Fauci told us he was doing this.
Bud: He did not.
Lou: Nobody asked him?
Bud: Yes, they did. Under oath.
Lou: And he admitted he gave taxpayer money to the Chinese lab?
Bud: No, he said he didn’t.
Lou: If he swore under oath that he did not fund the Chinese lab then how did we find out he did?
Bud: We have the papers that proved Fauci did exactly what he claimed he didn’t do.
Lou: Isn’t it illegal to lie under oath?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Is Fauci gonna be charged with a crime?
Bud: No.
Lou: Why not?
Bud: Because some lies are good lies.
Lou: You mean like telling children there is a Santa Claus?
Bud: No, that’s an evil lie because it perpetuates the falsehood that a happily married, cisgender, white male does good deeds around the world. The good lies are the ones that support politically correct narratives, such as the Russians stole the 2016 election.
Lou: Let’s get back to the Chinese and their lab.
Bud: Okay.
Lou: The Chinese don’t like us, do they?
Bud: They do not.
Lou: And this Chinese lab is the place that could create the material used in biological weapons?
Bud: Yes.
Lou: Why on earth would Fauci give them taxpayer money?
Bud: For science.
Lou: Let me get this straight. Vaccinations work because they protect us from the virus, but unvaccinated people must get vaccinated because they can give the virus to people who are already protected from the virus because they have been vaccinated, but the vaccinated can still catch the virus even though vaccinations work.
Bud: Precisely!
Lou: And the medical doctor advising the president is the one who gave American taxpayer money to the Chinese lab that created the virus that led to the global pandemic and he lied about doing this.
Bud: Now you got it.
Lou: Fauci must be the most hated man in America.
Bud: No, no. Fauci is beloved.
Lou: This doesn’t make any sense. Who loves him?
Bud: Politicians, news media, Hollywood, big tech, and government employees who get paid to stay home during lockdowns.
Lou: And the rest of America? The workers, entrepreneurs, first responders, farmers, tradesmen, factory workers, business owners, and families? Do they like Fauci?
Bud: Not in the slightest.
Lou: Let me get back to this. Everyone in America must get vaccinated except for Members of Congress, their staff, and members of the postal workers union.
Bud: And illegal immigrants.
Lou: Huh?
Bud: Illegal immigrants are exempt from getting vaccinations.
Lou: They belong to a union, too?
Bud: Don’t be silly.
Lou: Why are illegal immigrants exempt from getting vaccinations?
Bud: Because the president wants to immediately make them citizens so they can vote for him in 2024.
Lou: Is any of this legal?
Bud: No.
4
Spin Zone / Re: Washington Redskins retire team name
« on: July 13, 2020, 08:01:21 AM »
This is an e-mail sent to Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune after an article he published concerning a name change for the Washington Redskins. Very appropriate with what’s going on these days...
Dear Mr. Page: I agree with our Native American population. I am
highly jilted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins.
One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward.
Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians. If your shorts are in a wad because of the reference the name Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to get rid of the Cleveland Browns.
The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of
militant Blacks from the 60's alive. Gone. It's offensive to us white
folk.
The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a
team named for the Confederacy? No! There is no room for any reference to that tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives. I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate to have the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres.
Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and
pillaged. We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the
Minnesota Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh
Pirates!
Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message
to our children. The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits. Wrong message to our children.
The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a
growing childhood epidemic. Wrong message to our children. The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates. Wrong message to our children.
The Milwaukee Brewers. Well that goes without saying. Wrong message
to our children.
So, there you go. We need to support any legislation that comes out
to rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become
involved with this issue, as they should. Just the kind of thing the
do-nothing Congress loves.
As a die-hard Oregon State fan, my wife and I, with all of this in
mind, suggest it might also make some sense to change the name of the Oregon State women's athletic teams to something other than "the
Beavers (especially when they play Southern California. Do we really
want the Trojans sticking it to the Beavers???
I always love your articles and I generally agree with them. As for
the Redskins name I would suggest they change the name to the
"Foreskins" to better represent their community, paying tribute to the
dick heads in Washington DC
Dear Mr. Page: I agree with our Native American population. I am
highly jilted by the racially charged name of the Washington Redskins.
One might argue that to name a professional football team after Native Americans would exalt them as fine warriors, but nay, nay. We must be careful not to offend, and in the spirit of political correctness and courtesy, we must move forward.
Let's ditch the Kansas City Chiefs, the Atlanta Braves and the Cleveland Indians. If your shorts are in a wad because of the reference the name Redskins makes to skin color, then we need to get rid of the Cleveland Browns.
The Carolina Panthers obviously were named to keep the memory of
militant Blacks from the 60's alive. Gone. It's offensive to us white
folk.
The New York Yankees offend the Southern population. Do you see a
team named for the Confederacy? No! There is no room for any reference to that tragic war that cost this country so many young men's lives. I am also offended by the blatant references to the Catholic religion among our sports team names. Totally inappropriate to have the New Orleans Saints, the Los Angeles Angels or the San Diego Padres.
Then there are the team names that glorify criminals who raped and
pillaged. We are talking about the horrible Oakland Raiders, the
Minnesota Vikings, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Pittsburgh
Pirates!
Now, let us address those teams that clearly send the wrong message
to our children. The San Diego Chargers promote irresponsible fighting or even spending habits. Wrong message to our children.
The New York Giants and the San Francisco Giants promote obesity, a
growing childhood epidemic. Wrong message to our children. The Cincinnati Reds promote downers/barbiturates. Wrong message to our children.
The Milwaukee Brewers. Well that goes without saying. Wrong message
to our children.
So, there you go. We need to support any legislation that comes out
to rectify this travesty, because the government will likely become
involved with this issue, as they should. Just the kind of thing the
do-nothing Congress loves.
As a die-hard Oregon State fan, my wife and I, with all of this in
mind, suggest it might also make some sense to change the name of the Oregon State women's athletic teams to something other than "the
Beavers (especially when they play Southern California. Do we really
want the Trojans sticking it to the Beavers???
I always love your articles and I generally agree with them. As for
the Redskins name I would suggest they change the name to the
"Foreskins" to better represent their community, paying tribute to the
dick heads in Washington DC
6
Spin Zone / Re: Joke Thread: Post 'em if ya got 'em
« on: March 18, 2019, 08:49:57 PM »
Americans With No Abilities Act (AWNAA)
Democrat Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Cortez is considering introducing legislation that will provide new benefits for many more Americans. The Americans With No Abilities Act (AWNAA) is being hailed as a major legislative goal by advocates of the millions of Americans who lack any real skills and ambition.
“Roughly 50 percent of Americans do not possess the competence and drive necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society,” said California Sen. Kamala Harris.
“We can no longer stand by and allow People of Inability (POI) to be ridiculed and passed over. With this legislation, employers will no longer be able to grant special favors to a small group of workers, simply because they have some idea of what they are doing.”
In a Capitol Hill press conference, Nancy Pelosi pointed to the success of the U.S. Postal Service, which has a long-standing policy of providing opportunity without regard to performance. At the state
government level, the Department of Motor Vehicles also has an excellent record of hiring Persons with No Ability (63 percent).
Under the Americans With No Abilities Act, more than 25 million mid-level positions will be created, with important-sounding titles
but little real responsibility, thus providing an illusory sense of purpose and performance.
Finally, the Americans With No Abilities Act contains tough new measures to make it more difficult to discriminate against the
non-abled, banning, for example, discriminatory interview questions such as, “Do you have any skills or experience that relate to this job?”
“As a non-abled person, I can’t be expected to keep up with people who have something going for them,” said Mary Lou Gertz, who lost her position as a lug-nut twister at the Toyota plant in Georgetown, KY due to her inability to remember “righty tighty, lefty loosey”.
“This new law should be real good for people like me. I’ll finally have job security.” With the passage of this bill, Gertz and millions of other untalented citizens will finally see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Said Sen. Dick Durbin: “As a senator with no abilities, I believe the same privileges that elected officials enjoy ought to be extended to every American with no abilities. It is our duty as lawmakers to provide each and every American citizen, regardless of his or her inadequacy, with some sort of space to take up in this great nation and a good salary for doing so.”
This message was approved by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Diane Feinstein, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren & Nancy Pelosi........ all Americans With No Abilities whatsoever.
Democrat Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Cortez is considering introducing legislation that will provide new benefits for many more Americans. The Americans With No Abilities Act (AWNAA) is being hailed as a major legislative goal by advocates of the millions of Americans who lack any real skills and ambition.
“Roughly 50 percent of Americans do not possess the competence and drive necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society,” said California Sen. Kamala Harris.
“We can no longer stand by and allow People of Inability (POI) to be ridiculed and passed over. With this legislation, employers will no longer be able to grant special favors to a small group of workers, simply because they have some idea of what they are doing.”
In a Capitol Hill press conference, Nancy Pelosi pointed to the success of the U.S. Postal Service, which has a long-standing policy of providing opportunity without regard to performance. At the state
government level, the Department of Motor Vehicles also has an excellent record of hiring Persons with No Ability (63 percent).
Under the Americans With No Abilities Act, more than 25 million mid-level positions will be created, with important-sounding titles
but little real responsibility, thus providing an illusory sense of purpose and performance.
Finally, the Americans With No Abilities Act contains tough new measures to make it more difficult to discriminate against the
non-abled, banning, for example, discriminatory interview questions such as, “Do you have any skills or experience that relate to this job?”
“As a non-abled person, I can’t be expected to keep up with people who have something going for them,” said Mary Lou Gertz, who lost her position as a lug-nut twister at the Toyota plant in Georgetown, KY due to her inability to remember “righty tighty, lefty loosey”.
“This new law should be real good for people like me. I’ll finally have job security.” With the passage of this bill, Gertz and millions of other untalented citizens will finally see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Said Sen. Dick Durbin: “As a senator with no abilities, I believe the same privileges that elected officials enjoy ought to be extended to every American with no abilities. It is our duty as lawmakers to provide each and every American citizen, regardless of his or her inadequacy, with some sort of space to take up in this great nation and a good salary for doing so.”
This message was approved by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Diane Feinstein, Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren & Nancy Pelosi........ all Americans With No Abilities whatsoever.
7
Spin Zone / Re: Hypocrisy
« on: January 31, 2017, 10:19:28 AM »
If you get them young enough sometimes you can fix them. I'm working on my niece and I suspect I'm the reason she doesn't outright claim to be liberal. I'm not inundating her with right wing stuff, that doesn't work because those sources can be just as shrill and biased. I'm encouraging her to go to ALL sources on both sides and to use her own critical thinking skills to sort out truth from fiction. The facts are there but you have to go beyond getting all your news from the facebook feed and mainstream media.
But it's a job, you have to undo 12 years of public school indoctrination and then 4 years of university brainwashing. But if as in the case of my niece, she has not really been interested in politics at all until now, she's a clean slate other than the rhetoric that's been pounded into her. She has not engaged in a lot of deep rationalization yet.
But when they get old, like my brother, they've spent a lifetime building a strong rationalized structure of thought, all based on false foundations, but now set like concrete. I don't hold out any hope I'd ever be able to change him now, even without the wife.
Just like the false foundation of what you said Little Joe. The falsehood that males are somehow keeping females oppressed in this country. There is no wage discrimination. If there were, all employers would hire only women, because they'd be getting a deal. The payment disparity is because women are less productive and a higher risk to hire, because they still quit when they have babies, or take more time off.
I can't speak to how things were before I was born (mid 50s) but in my lifetime I have experienced exactly zero gender discrimination. I had a great career in a male dominated field (engineering). I've always been able to do anything I want, even in male dominated activities, like fly airplanes and shoot guns. I can also do female dominated things like sewing and baking, without the stigma of being an effeminate fruit. I perceive my world and opportunities to be much greater and more free than men's.
I have been able to work full time when I chose, and then quit and live off my husband when I chose. For the price of what? Having to keep the house reasonably clean for him? Cook a dinner most nights? Women call THAT being oppressed? It's NOTHING compared to what men go through daily to provide for us. And lets talk about men. The most dangerous and boring jobs go to males almost exclusively. Garbage pickup. Construction, soldiering in combat. By the way, why on earth women are screaming "sex discrimination" because they aren't allowed to go into combat is beyond me. Be careful what you wish for bitches. We are going to see the day drafting for combat includes women. Thanks a lot. Yeah I was really jealous of those guys registering for the draft during the Vietnam war.
For me, I'm happy to let the big strong men be warriors for me. Although if you're a diesel dyke and wish to have the exact same job as a man, I feel you should as long as you can pass the same physical strength standards. I don't believe in lowering standards just to let in women. But I also don't believe in discrimination so if you are female and can pass the standards, you should be let in.
But such women are not the ones with whom I have a problem. I have a problem with the precious little whiny clueless spoiled brats who demand that standards be adjusted for them. The young females protesting for "women's rights" in America today have reached a level of narcissistic self absorption I thought possible only in the most warped personality disorder, a level of deep ignorance and lack of insight that is beyond belief. A sense of entitlement far worse than any spoiled princess in any fairy tale.
But back to my point, THIS is an example of a false belief my brother apparently holds as a foundation for his liberalism - believing somehow that in America today females are still oppressed. How much does a person have to twist and warp their brain to believe this? How much must you deliberately shut your eyes to reality in front of you to believe like this? People like this actually believe that because Hillary lost the EC she did so because she's female and we are still oppressing women. Are you kidding me? Hillary reached heights of power and influence of which the great majority of males in this country couldn't even dream.
These snowflakes are crying and whining over poor Hillary having been oppressed by not being elected and what do they feel for the LITERALLY poor male without a job who voted for Trump - absolute contempt. If giving women the vote led to this kind of spoiled rotten confused priorities, we never should have done it.
But it's a job, you have to undo 12 years of public school indoctrination and then 4 years of university brainwashing. But if as in the case of my niece, she has not really been interested in politics at all until now, she's a clean slate other than the rhetoric that's been pounded into her. She has not engaged in a lot of deep rationalization yet.
But when they get old, like my brother, they've spent a lifetime building a strong rationalized structure of thought, all based on false foundations, but now set like concrete. I don't hold out any hope I'd ever be able to change him now, even without the wife.
Just like the false foundation of what you said Little Joe. The falsehood that males are somehow keeping females oppressed in this country. There is no wage discrimination. If there were, all employers would hire only women, because they'd be getting a deal. The payment disparity is because women are less productive and a higher risk to hire, because they still quit when they have babies, or take more time off.
I can't speak to how things were before I was born (mid 50s) but in my lifetime I have experienced exactly zero gender discrimination. I had a great career in a male dominated field (engineering). I've always been able to do anything I want, even in male dominated activities, like fly airplanes and shoot guns. I can also do female dominated things like sewing and baking, without the stigma of being an effeminate fruit. I perceive my world and opportunities to be much greater and more free than men's.
I have been able to work full time when I chose, and then quit and live off my husband when I chose. For the price of what? Having to keep the house reasonably clean for him? Cook a dinner most nights? Women call THAT being oppressed? It's NOTHING compared to what men go through daily to provide for us. And lets talk about men. The most dangerous and boring jobs go to males almost exclusively. Garbage pickup. Construction, soldiering in combat. By the way, why on earth women are screaming "sex discrimination" because they aren't allowed to go into combat is beyond me. Be careful what you wish for bitches. We are going to see the day drafting for combat includes women. Thanks a lot. Yeah I was really jealous of those guys registering for the draft during the Vietnam war.
For me, I'm happy to let the big strong men be warriors for me. Although if you're a diesel dyke and wish to have the exact same job as a man, I feel you should as long as you can pass the same physical strength standards. I don't believe in lowering standards just to let in women. But I also don't believe in discrimination so if you are female and can pass the standards, you should be let in.
But such women are not the ones with whom I have a problem. I have a problem with the precious little whiny clueless spoiled brats who demand that standards be adjusted for them. The young females protesting for "women's rights" in America today have reached a level of narcissistic self absorption I thought possible only in the most warped personality disorder, a level of deep ignorance and lack of insight that is beyond belief. A sense of entitlement far worse than any spoiled princess in any fairy tale.
But back to my point, THIS is an example of a false belief my brother apparently holds as a foundation for his liberalism - believing somehow that in America today females are still oppressed. How much does a person have to twist and warp their brain to believe this? How much must you deliberately shut your eyes to reality in front of you to believe like this? People like this actually believe that because Hillary lost the EC she did so because she's female and we are still oppressing women. Are you kidding me? Hillary reached heights of power and influence of which the great majority of males in this country couldn't even dream.
These snowflakes are crying and whining over poor Hillary having been oppressed by not being elected and what do they feel for the LITERALLY poor male without a job who voted for Trump - absolute contempt. If giving women the vote led to this kind of spoiled rotten confused priorities, we never should have done it.
Pages: [1]