Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - nddons

Pages: 1 ... 106 107 [108] 109 110 ... 134
1606
Spin Zone / Re: Another One Bites the Dust....
« on: November 30, 2017, 01:25:28 PM »
In other words, 'just because the evidence is nonexistent, doesn't mean it didn't happen.'

Every husband caught banging some other woman uses a variation of the same spiel. 'Are you going to believe ME, or your own lying eyes?'

Between the timeline, the yearbook, the silliness of the claims and the relationship of at least one key accuser and their employment with the democrat party, this has ALL the earmarks of a democrat sham.

If it walks like a dick, talks like a duck, and squeals like a duck... it's a duck.
Or a dick.

1607
A "necessity" pushed by whom? I'd like to grab those guys by their pussies...
Yep.  So when people are extolling the necessity to pass this pile of crap masquerading as “Tax Reform,” watch what the other hand is doing.

1608
Congress continues to fuck up “tax reform.”  The proposed Senate bill has a “trigger” that if revenue goals aren’t met, there will be “automatic” tax increases.  So regardless of whether lower tax receipts are due to a future recession, war, or whatever, these cowards can stand aside and watch US taxpayers turn over more of their hard earned money.  No discussion of automatic SPENDING CUTS. 

Not a one of them is acting in our interests. Not a one.

1609
Spin Zone / Re: Now Yellen is worried about the debt!
« on: November 29, 2017, 06:18:02 PM »
Why hasn't she been concerned for the past 8 years?

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/29/yellen-20-trillion-national-debt-should-keep-people-awake-at-night.html
So says the woman who heads the same bank that conducted at least 3 rounds of Quantitative Easing.  Fucking swamp creature.


Sent from my iPad . Squirrel!!

1610
Spin Zone / Re: Who will be the next President?
« on: November 24, 2017, 09:48:43 AM »
Then he will withdraw. Trump will not run in 2020.

Gar-on-tea
Honestly, during the campaign, I thought at the unlikely event that he would get elected, he would be one and done.

Since then, I've seen him as someone who wants to accomplish things, and get the job done. I don't think he feels he can get things done in the next three years, so he's going to run for a second term. And I'd vote for him.

1611
We are all being killed by high Federal rates.  But just because some people live in a State that chooses to tax the shit out of them doesn't mean you should pay less tax than those in low tax states.

But thanks for not resorting to name calling and insults.

As for Stan, YES, I do think Federal tax should be fair.  Which is completely different than the liberal mantra of everyone paying their "fair share, which has nothing to do with fairness.  Let me ask you, Stan, Other than greed, why do you think your State taxes deserve to be deductible on your Federal return?

I could discuss this in further depth, but I don't like the tone the discussion took.
The state tax deduction has been in the Code since the inception of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913, and was even in the law in 1862 when the Congress tried to impose its first income tax to fund the Civil War.

There is a public policy position that a citizen's income shouldn't be taxed twice. In other words, if the federal government taxed a citizen's disposable income, income confiscated at the state level is no longer available as disposable income, and shouldn't be subject to double taxation.

Further, it's not just one's home state income tax.  S Corps and Partnerships that operate in multiple states require their owners to file tax returns in most of those states, or file "composite" returns for the business income.  I have two clients that file in 26 and 38 jurisdictions respectively. This is not at all uncommon for manufacturers, wholesalers, or distributors that have "nexus" in multiple states.

These state taxes are not deductible as business expenses on the S or LLC returns. They are treated in all respects as itemized deductions on the S Corp shareholder or LLC member's Schedule A. Those business state income tax payments will be lost deductions in this tax reform, effectively increasing the taxable income on the businesses.  And if these businesses are not those eligible for the reduced flow through rate, such as professional service firms, there will be no reduced tax rate to offset the increase in income. It will be a net tax increase for the owners of those businesses.

It's not greed, it's fairness.  For 104 years state tax deductions were an integral part of the Tax Code.  Now Paul Ryan is calling such things "loopholes", which makes him no different than leftists such as Chuck Schumer and even Republicans choosing to demagogue this issue.

1612
True, but they are some of the ones that are trying to defeat tax reform because it infringes on their tax deductions, when their taxes have nothing to do with the rest of the country.
They are perfectly justified in taxing themselves, but they have no right to expect the rest of the country to subsidize those taxes.
Your language, just like the language of Paul Ryan, is the language of the left.  Your premise is that the government owns the fruits of our labor, and a deduction ("loophole" to people like you and Ryan) takes from the mouth of FedGov.  How twisted.

You aren't subsidizing shit when someone takes a tax deduction to which they are lawfully entitled.  Many of us live where the jobs are, and don't have the portability of moving to no-tax states. I've lived in 4 high-tax states, three of which are manufacturing-rich states, and I work for manufacturers.

I'm currently in Wisconsin - in 2013 (last stat I saw) it was the top manufacturing state in the nation, with 795 manufacturing jobs per 10,000 people.  Similar results with the rest of the rust belt - Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Kansas.

Wisconsin has been lead by Democrats and Socialists for decades.  I was part of the effort to make Wisconsin purple with brief shades of red, with Scott Walker and a Republican legislature. I'm on the tax Committee and Public Policy Committee of professional and statewide manufacturing group.  Taxes have been going down, but the ability to turn a rust-belt state into a no-tax or low-tax state is extremely difficult if not impossible.

Maybe I can say federal taxes from our Wisconsin manufacturing jobs are subsidizing the sloth in your state.

I'm sick of Republicans buying into the divisive language of the left, whether it's class envy or tax policy.

1613
Spin Zone / Re: Al Frankin should resign
« on: November 16, 2017, 09:30:33 PM »
But wait - he's sorry, and he's a liberal. So that's ok, no harm and no foul.

This is the double standard that passes for ethics.
And that's why the Senate Ethics committee wants to do an "investigation."  So they can say that he's sorry, thus no ethics violation.

It's not a swamp, it's a sewer.

1614
What denials? From Roy Moore? When someone is arrested and shouts, "I didn't do it, you got the wrong guy!" should we just believe him because he denied it?

His interview with Hannity didn't help him at all, either. You say "unsubstantiated" except that they've been corroborated by multiple people. If they're false, the victims will lose a lot more than they stand to gain by coming forward. If this were a single victim with no corroboration, I think you'd have a stronger point. As it stands, with 5 victims and others going on the record discussing his past behavior, it lends credibility to this being something.
I'm sorry, but the statute of limitations exists for a reason.  I cannot wrap my head around why these victims, whether of Moore, Spacy, Weinstein, or even the Catholic priest abuse, didn't come forward when it was current, provable, and prosecutable. I'm not saying the above group are all innocent, but for these allegations to appear fucking DECADES later, out of the clear blue, and at the most personally damaging time, test my sense of credulity of the "victims." 

Giving the benefit of the doubt to the accusers is as abusive as the alleged crime, absent a reasonable excuse as to why these charges weren't raised when they happened.   I've yet to hear a convincing and compelling reason why they weren't raised at the time of the alleged abuse, for any of the above.

1615
Spin Zone / Re: Texas constitutional amendments
« on: November 07, 2017, 01:23:38 PM »
The career politicians of both parties have no motivation to reduce spending.  The bigger the pie, the bigger their piece.  They only care about their personal wealth, and power which grows with more spending, and bigger government.  In this regard, the Republicans are bigger hypocrites than the Democrats because they LIE about wanting less government, and lower spending.
They're eating their own in Milwaukee County. The liberal County Executive Chris Abele proposed raising a wheel tax from $30 to $60. The also liberal County Board members are having a shit fit, saying their constituents can't afford it, and are saying that before their constituents are told to find it in their budget, the county needs to look at IT'S budget and see where they can cut waste. So of course the first place Abele goes is that he will have to cut Police, Fire, and first responders.

SHAZAAM!  Finally some libs are seeing the problem with spending OPM, as articulated so well by Margaret Thatcher.

1616
Spin Zone / To football players who take a knee
« on: November 05, 2017, 09:25:43 AM »
Not related to the NFL, but related to sports:

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/21277983/mark-cuban-says-warriors-draymond-green-owes-apology-remark-team-owners

NBA player Draymond Green is saying that Mark Cuban, and others, shouldn't use the term "owner" because it implies they own people. Mark Cuban responded by saying that he owns equity, not people and it's wrong for Draymond Green to make that assertion.

We're now at the point where owning a company is offensive because it has the term "own" in it. Aside from that, the word "chairmen" has a legal component to it, such as the "chairman of the board" and is not appropriate for all situations.
Maybe we should start an era where we don't give a shit if people are offended, and instead of asking for an apology, the appropriate response would be to just tell the offending party to go fuck themselves. 

Oh, wait. That era lasted from about 1776 to 1988 or so.

1617
2016 was a snore fest, from two has-been teams. Look at the line cards stats for both series. First four games of 2016 were never in doubt. Got a lot better last three games, game 7 was outstanding. 2017 the whole series was good. Record number of HRs, two games into extra innings, Springer tied Reggie for HRs in a series, home field advantage change(Dodgers, on the losing end), Houston is a WS virgin. No comparison. One good game in 2016, six good and one great game in 2017.
You're dead to me.


1618
Spin Zone / Re: Over/Under on Donna Brazile's future
« on: November 02, 2017, 06:56:51 PM »



Sent from my iPad . Squirrel!!

1619
Spin Zone / Re: Another Snackbar Truck Attack, in NYC
« on: October 31, 2017, 03:17:36 PM »

1620
Spin Zone / Re: Universal Hot vs Crazy Matrix
« on: October 28, 2017, 01:26:39 PM »
Hilarious,
And I couldn't argue with a single thing.

I think I will show that to my wife.  NOT!
You should!  It will prove to her that you consider her hot and not crazy!

Pages: 1 ... 106 107 [108] 109 110 ... 134