PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Lucifer on July 26, 2018, 03:41:32 PM
-
This is a good one:
And for the snowflake crowd, it's called "satire".
-
Dems are missing the satire synapse. I think they don’t really get puns, either.*
I guess I can see why the Dems are getting all tingly about this person, considering the crop of lightweights, Dufuses, and incompetents that people their ranks.
I remember one reporter slobbering about how much “gravitas” John Kerry had.
*Except for our own asechrest, whom I really believe is not truly liberal.
-
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/10/ocasio-cortez-shapiros-debate-ladies/
Rejects an honest offer of $10,000 for debate by trying to play the sex card.
And it fails miserably when several women up the ante and call her out on straight policy debate offer.
-
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/10/ocasio-cortez-shapiros-debate-ladies/
Rejects an honest offer of $10,000 for debate by trying to play the sex card.
And it fails miserably when several women up the ante and call her out on straight policy debate offer.
She has stumbled through some softball interviews recently, including by CNN's Chris Cuomo. There's no way she'd be able to satisfactorily get through a debate with Shapiro.
-
In a normal world this intellectual midget (sorry, “small person”) would have outlived her 15 minutes of fame in about 15 minutes.
Instead, the MSM and democrats are so desperate for a face of the party that isn’t wrinkled or doesn’t smell like rotten seafood, they are clinging to this person who can’t even cite a single fact about why the sky is blue, let alone converse about economics, politics, or the Constitution.
-
In a normal world this intellectual midget (sorry, “small person”) would have outlived her 15 minutes of fame in about 15 minutes.
Instead, the MSM and democrats are so desperate for a face of the party that isn’t wrinkled or doesn’t smell like rotten seafood, they are clinging to this person who can’t even cite a single fact about why the sky is blue, let alone converse about economics, politics, or the Constitution.
The leftist most parts of the Democratic Party thought she may be their answer going forward. She's young, a female, hispanic, and socialist. What they're learning after all of the candidates she backed lost, her horrible interviews, and now her comparing an offer to debate to sexual harassment is that she may not be the person they want to be the face of their movement going forward.
-
This poor young thing, obviously a product of our public indoctrination, I mean education system (but I repeat myself).
Literally the poster child for the participation trophy generation - probably ALWAYS been told how smart and pretty she is, never been pushed or denied or challenged.
She is IMO functionally illiterate with respect to history, our specific form of government, and her supposed degree'd field of economics (much like the last occupant at 1600 Penn who was supposed to be a constitutional scholar, cough cough).
She literally ALWAYS looks bat shit crazy with those insane eyes, and like, if I like, ever have to, like, hear her, like, say, 'like', I think I like, will totally want to die.
These nitwits are such intellectual lightweights, what is sad is the large swath of people to whom she seems normal, sane or intelligent.
'Gimp
-
My thoughts exactly Gimp. Obama was an empty suit. Ocasio-Cortez is an empty Taco, without the shell. (yes I know she's not Mexican, but you get the picture)
-
http://dailycaller.com/2018/08/10/ocasio-cortez-shapiros-debate-ladies/
Rejects an honest offer of $10,000 for debate by trying to play the sex card.
And it fails miserably when several women up the ante and call her out on straight policy debate offer.
Devils advocate mode here -
She don’t have to debate every god-damn pundit who demands a debate - the only person she legitimately needs to respond to a debate request from are those on the same ballot, such as Anthony Pappas. Where the heck is he? Hiding in a bunker someplace? Why the hell isn’t he demanding a debate? It isn’t like he doesn’t have the intellect for it for pity sake.
-
Devils advocate mode here -
She don’t have to debate every god-damn pundit who demands a debate - the only person she legitimately needs to respond to a debate request from are those on the same ballot, such as Anthony Pappas. Where the heck is he? Hiding in a bunker someplace? Why the hell isn’t he demanding a debate? It isn’t like he doesn’t have the intellect for it for pity sake.
Maybe I missed where someone chastised her for refusing to debate. What I heard was criticism of her equating the offer to debate with sexual harassment.