Stolen from another forum I am on:

How was Putin able to get the sitting AG of the United States to meet in secret with the spouse of a potential Defendant on a tarmac?

How was Putin able to get the DNC to rig the primaries against Bernie Sanders?

How was Putin able to get the Republicans to start a #NeverTrump movement?

How was Putin able to trick the former Secretary of State into running a pay-for-play scam?

Can one of the liberal/progressives answer these questions?  No, the CIA would never LIE, no never. 

Right, it couldn't possibly have anything to do with their girls being a year or two out of finishing high school. It's definitely because they want to remain in the spotlight.(/sarcasm)

So Hussein Obama hasn't said he will be commenting on Trump's decisions, and policies?  There are private schools in Chicago, and Hawaii too.  (no saracasm)

Sent from my iPhone . Squirrel!!

Sent from my Chipmunk!!!

Being as Trump's response to the question "Who would you appoint to the Supreme Court" was "people who will uphold the Constitution" as opposed to Hillary's "People who will promote a liberal activist agenda",  it's pretty clear Trump respects the Constitution FAR more than the person they wanted.

Idiots.

Hillary, and the Democrats (all Progressives/Liberals) look at the courts, including the Supreme Court as a way to circumvent the Constitution, and the will of the PEOPLE.  It is a way to be ROYALTY, and dictate to us by fiat.  That is why they are so pissed off about this election.  They don't get to be dictators yet.  This is why we have guns, and this is why the Democrats don't want law abiding citizens having guns. 

So the Democrats, and the media are just saying the Russians hacked Hillary's email and divulged all the dirt that she committed with the DNC, and others?  They are not saying the Russians hacked the results, correct?

Therefore, it doesn't matter that she did all these horrible things, it just matters who exposed them?  Wow.  Talk about priorities. 

The comments on that article are quite accurate.

Funny, I am feeling more hopeful than I think I ever have. Michelle Obama is, quite honestly, fairly devoid of any substantive reason to admire her, or to give weight to anything she opines.

Hope is a concept. But "great" is observable! 

She is hopeless because the working masses finally have hope again, and her brand of communism, dependency, and control is not needed anymore.  Too bad hypocrite.  Go away, NOW.  If you run for office you will be trounced. 

No votes were hacked in this election.  The FBI and NSA seem to be at odds with the CIA as to whether the Russians had anything to do with anything.  We had all of the Podesta emails courtesy of Podesta being an idiot and answering a phishing email. Julian Assange has stated that one of his associates met a DNC operative to recieve the DNC emails. The CIA refuses to appear in front of Congress.

Just WTF is there to review?

I ask what exactly was hacked?  Individual voting machines?  How would that work?  Someone very powerful, maybe Soros, or someone like him, or a group of powerful people is pulling strings in the CIA.  This is scarier than if the Russians did somehow infiltrate the election.

The Clinton/Dem donors are demanding a Post Mortem on exactly why Hillary lost, and Russia is not popping up as a reason. 

  NEW YORK — When Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine greet the very top fundraisers and donors to their failed campaign at New York’s Plaza Hotel on Thursday evening, many of them will have one question in mind: Where’s the autopsy?

The call for a deep and detailed accounting of how Clinton lost a race that she and her donors were absolutely certain she’d win didn’t begin immediately after the election — there was too much shock over her defeat by Donald Trump, and overwhelming grief. Her initial conference call with top backers, which came just days after the outcome, focused primarily on FBI Director Jim Comey’s late campaign-season intervention.

But in the weeks since, the wealthy Democrats who helped pump over $1 billion into Clinton’s losing effort have been urging their local finance staffers, state party officials, and campaign aides to provide a more thorough explanation of what went wrong. With no dispassionate, centralized analysis of how Clinton failed so spectacularly, they insist, how can they be expected to keep contributing to the party?

The Democrat donors gave Hillary $1 BILLION dollars to spend on her campaign, and they expected a return on their investment in INFLUENCE in public policy (laws, and regs, etc)  that would benefit them.  They lost their bet, and are now furious. 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/hillary-clinton-campaign-donors-post-mortem-232715

Wow, the Democrats are now advocating a full blown Coup d'état.  This is Banana Republic stuff, totally in line with the Obama Admin's past eight years.  If you can't win legally, make up stuff, and see what sticks.  This is really a new low for the Democrats.  I hope a coalition of Dems realizes this is ridiculous, and calls for their party to cease and desist, but I am not holding my breath.

I noticed the comments calling for an investigation, and postponement of the electoral college vote so Hillary can be installed are mostly from bubble headed, brainwashed WOMEN. 

Maybe it comes with the territory.  In other words, it's "normal" for this level of depression to show up in this group of people as a result of the occupation itself.

There is depression, and then there is clinical, deep, debilitating depression.  Humans have bad moods, and ups, and downs.  It is part of being human.  That is "normal."  When people are deeply depressed long term, and/or start talking about doing stupid stuff, that is a red flag.