91
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Didn't take her long to play the race card, and in church no less.
https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1746652976305803744?s=20
I think (hope) we’ve all got more spirit of liberty in us now. I refused to wear a mask until the signs went up saying the government required it. You know, “Please help us comply.” I didn’t want to bring fines down on my wonderful local grocery store, so I masked in there. Yet I know people who did not mask at all, were pleasant about it when approached, and suffered no repercussions.
Now, I would not mask unless it was required for health care. I think that whatever is in store for us down the line this year will not include masks. America is done with that.
The problem is way larger than Fauci and the CDC. It’s all the sheep that followed them. Places like Walmart where you had lines out the door with markers on the sidewalk every six feet and you had people obeying them. Markers on the floor inside at the checkout counters and one way arrows on all the aisles.
You know that companies implemented these policies to cover themselves legally. Because we are a lawsuit happy society. And the people were all too happy to go along with it.
They would never have gotten away with this bullshit if Americans weren’t now a bunch of stupid cowardly pussies.
But then they were lied to if not outright than by implication, that there was some scientific basis behind it.
Honestly I just don’t see that argument at all as prohibiting the states from enforcing it. Yes, Congress has that power. It doesn’t say it has to be used to enforce it. It also doesn’t say it belongs exclusively to the Federal government. They could have written it that way, but they did not.
One could try a Federal pre-emotion argument I suppose. But insofar as the COTUS explicitly says that the states are free to choose their electors in a manner that they choose, that seems like a stretch.
Certainly the states are not prohibited explicitly from deciding that someone they find guilty of insurrection can’t be on the ballot, if they wish to use an election to choose the electors. So express pre-emption is out. Field pre-emotion seems like a stretch because the Federal government doesn’t hold a presidential election other than through the electoral college. Maybe some sort of conflict with the rights of the populace could work - I don’t know.
I am not even sure the SCOTUS will grant certiorari as the issues don’t seem to clearly fall into a Federal issue.
I guess we’ll find out about at least that issue soon.