Now, we have evidence of fraud, and the republicans want to investigate, yet you and your fellow communist want it stopped.   

What is your evidence of fraud?  Some cockeyed statistical analysis?  Or does Trump saying something automatically make it true?

So, your answer is no, statistically unlikely voting patterns should not be investigated (if they benefit Democrats).

The way that guy calculated his statistics was so devoid of basis as to be nearly farcical.  Hey look, if there's evidence of vote fraud by all means.  Find and punish the perpetrators and set the record right.  I don't want my guy to win in a dishonest contest.  But frankly, all I'm seeing is "our guy lost, so it must be fraud especially since he says so".

Here, let me explain this to you.

 Yes, the Secretary of State oversees the election process put forth in the state's law.  Each county has an election supervisor, who may be an R, a D or an independent.   The county election supervisor is responsible to follow orders from the SoS and the applicable laws.

 Now, let's say in the counties with adult supervision (R) we are seeing little voting issues, but in the major urban counties that are blue (D) we are seeing all sorts of regularities coming in.

 Now it is up to the SoS and the GA Legislature to intervene, which oddly enough, is happening.   Oh, and this is what has the (D)'s upset in GA.  Notice the (R) counties are not pitching hissy fits and welcome an audit and recount.   Tells you all you need to know.

 So, why exactly are you so opposed to election audits and recounts?   Don't you want the elections to be shown as honest with integrity?

 The votes don't have to be certified until Dec 14th, so why the rush?

Where have I said that I was against recounts?  As far as I know, many of these states are going to do recounts because the election was close.  What I said was that most of the Mango Mussilini's objections are baseless, there is no evidence at all of massive fraud.  That's why all his lawsuits have been thrown out.

I agree with the objections that the counts aren't done, in many states they aren't.  The problem is the massive numbers of absentee and other mail in ballots.  There are no provisions to count them quickly, so it takes time.  What is clear is that in the states that have been called, there aren't sufficient ballots outstanding to change the result.

Of course, if the same thing happens in the recount, e.g. absentee ballots have to be scrutinized one by one for signatures, the recounts are going be similarly glacial.

The one thing of which I am absolutely sure, no matter what happens, when Biden is finally announced the winner by whatever body for whom you guys are waiting, Trump will claim fraud and file lawsuits.  He will not concede his loss under any circumstances. He will continue to rail agains the theft of his election until his dying day. No doubt you all will do likewise.

I'm just hoping that Trump is an aberration, and not the new normal.  All this divisiveness is really bad for America.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/newly-surfaced-video-july-fauci-tests-dead-virus

I have to disagree with Dr. Fauci on this.  RNAs aren't terribly stable intracellularly.  I doubt you'd pick up an inactive infection unless it was just ending.

Trump wins, election is fine (news flash: Trump LOST the popular vote to Hillary Clinton). Trump looses, has to be fraud. The only answer possible. It couldn’t possibly be that his politics of division didn’t piss off the half of the voting population that isn’t White, wealthy and/or racist. It couldn’t possibly be that he violently mishandled the pandemic (with 5% of the world population we have 20% of the cases). No, it has to be fraud.  No other explanation possible. I’ve seen this nonsense before. And the funniest thing is you all believe that these government functionaries, who according to most of the folks on this site can’t manage to chew gum and walk at the same time, are now able to contain a giant conspiracy that spans states and election apparatus and involves officials of both parties.

So what about the ones where the observers were escorted out of the room and the door was locked?   What about the ones where the windows were covered over by cardboard?   

 Are you alleging that allowing to watch "a few" suffices for all?

 Also, again, if there is nothing to hide, then why keep anyone out?  Shouldn't the democrats be willing to prove to everyone how legit this is?

Oh, and by the way, a bunch of the states where Trumplethinskin is baselessly alleging fraud are run by Republicans and have Republican Secretaries of State running the elections.

Sanity and adult supervision.