PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 18, 2022, 09:48:51 AM

Title: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 18, 2022, 09:48:51 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1483389104226062336
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Lucifer on January 18, 2022, 09:51:42 AM
Agreed
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Number7 on January 18, 2022, 09:53:43 AM
The senile imposter is so unpopular that he is dragging down all democrats.

Tulsi sees the handwriting and the wall and the tsunami coming their way.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: jb1842 on January 18, 2022, 10:13:51 AM
Our country was founded on the basis of the people telling the government to go fuck themselves.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 18, 2022, 10:54:36 AM
Can you imagine if McConnell didn’t fight to keep Merrick Garland off the Supreme Court? 

What a dangerous partisan hack.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Lucifer on January 18, 2022, 10:57:19 AM
Can you imagine if McConnell didn’t fight to keep Merrick Garland off the Supreme Court? 

What a dangerous partisan hack.

Could you imagine if McConnell would stand up for his and other senators constituents on issues such as election fraud, Jan 6 prisoners, illegal mandates, etc, etc............
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Number7 on January 18, 2022, 11:42:20 AM
Could you imagine if McConnell would stand up for his and other senators constituents on issues such as election fraud, Jan 6 prisoners, illegal mandates, etc, etc............

That’s not possible.

The turtle sold out to china and big pharma decades ago
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 18, 2022, 12:48:19 PM
Could you imagine if McConnell would stand up for his and other senators constituents on issues such as election fraud, Jan 6 prisoners, illegal mandates, etc, etc............
Don’t mistake me for a McConnell supporter. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while.

McConnell only shows a glimmer of leadership when he’s happily ensconced as the MINORITY leader.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: elwood blues on January 18, 2022, 02:37:10 PM
Lately she appears to be saying the right things, but she's still a liberal democrat until she backs it up with actions.  Until then, I don't trust her.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on January 18, 2022, 03:30:57 PM
Lately she appears to be saying the right things, but she's still a liberal democrat until she backs it up with actions.  Until then, I don't trust her.

Agree. But apparently a lot of Democrats are seeing the light with respect to authoritarianism. They might not be becoming far right conservative but they seem to be rejecting the current drive for power among the left.

https://rumble.com/vstf6d-the-democrats-are-hemorrhaging-support...-enjoy-the-midterms.html
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 18, 2022, 03:45:59 PM
Lately she appears to be saying the right things, but she's still a liberal democrat until she backs it up with actions.  Until then, I don't trust her.
Out of every single democrat politician in the US, Tulsi has appeared the most well balanced, fair, and independent thinker.  When she speaks, I listen.

I’m not going to sell her as a GOP politician, but the political world could use more Tulsi’s and fewer Liz Cheneys.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: texasag93 on January 18, 2022, 04:36:00 PM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1483389104226062336

Would.

 ;D
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Anthony on January 18, 2022, 05:30:24 PM
Lately she appears to be saying the right things, but she's still a liberal democrat until she backs it up with actions.  Until then, I don't trust her.

She's anti 2A which is a huge deal breaker for me.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on January 18, 2022, 05:33:45 PM
She's anti 2A which is a huge deal breaker for me.

There is zero point in being pro freedom if you are anti 2A.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 18, 2022, 05:37:18 PM
Would.

 ;D
And that’s why I think she’s simply mis-partied. No good looking female democrat politicians exist, so
I’m sure it was just a clerical mistake that she checked the “D” box.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: jb1842 on January 18, 2022, 06:01:47 PM
Out of every single democrat politician in the US, Tulsi has appeared the most well balanced, fair, and independent thinker.  When she speaks, I listen.

I’m not going to sell her as a GOP politician, but the political world could use more Tulsi’s and fewer Liz Cheneys.

I'm getting the feeling that Crenshaw is now the next McCain and future Cheney. Such a disappointment.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 18, 2022, 07:49:50 PM
An aside since a rumble link was posted. Bongino announced his payment platform today. It is in partnership with rumble. www.paralleleconomy.com
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 21, 2022, 06:04:15 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1484471514237784070

More Tulsi...
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on January 21, 2022, 06:35:38 AM
Would too.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on January 21, 2022, 07:45:05 AM
I think she's a phony.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 21, 2022, 07:47:34 AM
I think she's a phony.
In what way?  She’s a democrat who has conservative tendencies on some issues, and single-handedly took out KamelToe from contention in the Democrat debates in 2019.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Lucifer on January 21, 2022, 08:15:23 AM
I think she's a phony.

 Welcome to politics.

Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on January 21, 2022, 08:30:00 AM
I think she's a phony.
Other than the fact that she is a politician, why do you think she is a phony?  I disagree with some of her politics, but I also agree with a lot of it.  I respect her for calling out her own party.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 21, 2022, 08:30:59 AM
Welcome to politics.
If the democrats weren’t hell bent on going full blown Marxism and authoritarianism, they could have run Tulsi or someone like her, and the GOP would have been in a world of hurt. 
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on January 21, 2022, 08:35:23 AM
If the democrats weren’t hell bent on going full blown Marxism and authoritarianism, they could have run Tulsi or someone like her, and the GOP would have been in a world of hurt.
They wouldn't even have had to cheat.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on January 21, 2022, 08:36:16 AM
In what way?  She’s a democrat who has conservative tendencies on some issues, and single-handedly took out KamelToe from contention in the Democrat debates in 2019.

She's a 2A infringer, therefore a non-starter. Her FN colleagues like Hannity have yet to call her out.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Lucifer on January 21, 2022, 08:38:47 AM
She's a 2A infringer, therefore a non-starter. Her FN colleagues like Hannity have yet to call her out.

  Hannity is another phony.  Why would one phony call out another phony?

  It's all Kabuki theater.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on January 21, 2022, 08:45:29 AM
She's a 2A infringer, therefore a non-starter. Her FN colleagues like Hannity have yet to call her out.
I too disagree with her stance on 2A, but how does that make her a phony, other than perhaps the fact that she may have carried a weapon during her military service?

edit:  She may be a phony.  I don't know so that is why I ask.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 21, 2022, 11:29:03 AM
I too disagree with her stance on 2A, but how does that make her a phony, other than perhaps the fact that she may have carried a weapon during her military service?

edit:  She may be a phony.  I don't know so that is why I ask.
I was going to ask the same thing. She’s not trying to be a Republican.  She seems genuine in everything she says, at least to me. That’s true whether I agree with her (i.e. she’s against most foreign intervention) or I don’t. (I.e. 2A)
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: elwood blues on January 21, 2022, 03:45:52 PM
I think she's a phony.

Like a Trojan Horse kind of phony?

The Tulsi/Crenshaw types are the ones that require the most vigilance.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on January 21, 2022, 03:49:36 PM
Like a Trojan Horse kind of phony?

The Tulsi/Crenshaw types are the ones that require the most vigilance.

I forgot what Crenshaw did that pissed us off. I remember it was something.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 22, 2022, 07:54:06 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1484845211410784258

I wonder if she wrote this?
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on January 22, 2022, 09:12:47 AM
Like a Trojan Horse kind of phony?

The Tulsi/Crenshaw types are the ones that require the most vigilance.

Precisely.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on January 22, 2022, 10:29:00 AM
Precisely.
They ALL require vigilance. Every single one of them. I’m keeping an eagle eye on DeSantis. Maybe it comes from voting Republican since Reagan’s election in 1980, but I trust no politician, particularly ones they talk a good game and then turn. The Tea Party caucus is a shell of what it could have been.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on February 10, 2022, 07:59:02 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1490624516065689603
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on February 10, 2022, 07:59:17 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1490267240502943755
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 08:12:21 AM
https://twitter.com/i/status/1490624516065689603
I don’t know why I find her so hot but I do. Besides being a brunette, she seems pretty intellectual to me. If not intellectual, then she seems very level headed.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on February 10, 2022, 08:35:25 AM
I don’t know why I find her so hot but I do. Besides being a brunette, she seems pretty intellectual to me. If not intellectual, then she seems very level headed.

Is that hot? I always thought men liked dumb blonds.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Mr Pou on February 10, 2022, 08:37:43 AM
Is that hot? I always thought men liked dumb blonds.

Blondes are great, but smart blue eyed brunettes are killer!
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: jb1842 on February 10, 2022, 08:38:16 AM
Is that hot? I always thought men liked dumb blonds.

Maybe for a night or a weekend, but dumb women piss me off.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 09:05:56 AM
Is that hot? I always thought men liked dumb blonds.
Yes that’s hot. I can’t speak for Anthony, but dumb blonds are a major turnoff for me.

Brunettes all the way.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Username on February 10, 2022, 10:11:44 AM
How do we feel about gingers?
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: jb1842 on February 10, 2022, 10:40:30 AM
How do we feel about gingers?

They may have no soul, but goddamn are they fun in bed.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Mr Pou on February 10, 2022, 11:44:36 AM
How do we feel about gingers?

Thumbs WAY up!
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Anthony on February 10, 2022, 12:24:02 PM
Yes that’s hot. I can’t speak for Anthony, but dumb blonds are a major turnoff for me.

Brunettes all the way.

I don't do dumb anything.   I only pick the smart, conniving, manipulative, diabolical ones.  But only the most devious of them.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Mr Pou on February 10, 2022, 12:30:29 PM
I don't do dumb anything.   I only pick the smart, conniving, manipulative, diabolical ones.  But only the most devious of them.

Makes one wonder who is the hunter and who is the hunted?
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on February 10, 2022, 12:58:52 PM
How do we feel about gingers?

All I know is what happens with my marriage when I dye my hair red. Although my normal brunette works well too…
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President-Elect Bob Noel on February 10, 2022, 01:12:33 PM
personally I prefer natural hair color.

Nothing worse than bleached hair, especially asian woman.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: jb1842 on February 10, 2022, 01:21:36 PM
personally I prefer natural hair color.

Nothing worse than bleached hair, especially asian woman.

20 years ago when I was in Tokyo, some of the girls there used to dye their hair blonde, wear 12 inch soled boots and outrageous clothes, and be annoying in general. They couldn't walk up and down steps by themselves, so would link arms together. Like up to 10 people together. You make one fall, they all fell. It was a fun game, and being assigned to the embassy, we enjoyed a certain amount of diplomatic immunity. But anyone over 30 laughed when they took a tumble. Getting them to fall in the subway was the best. They used to have a special name, but I forgot it.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 01:49:35 PM
How do we feel about gingers?
Every one I’ve dated was batshit crazy. No gingers for me.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 01:50:29 PM
I don't do dumb anything.   I only pick the smart, conniving, manipulative, diabolical ones.  But only the most devious of them.
I wish Tapatalk had a “like” button.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 01:59:31 PM
All I know is what happens with my marriage when I dye my hair red. Although my normal brunette works well too…
Salma Hayek
Catherine Zeta Jones
Sandra Bullock
Jennifer Garner
Our Rush
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on February 10, 2022, 02:09:09 PM
Every one I’ve dated was batshit crazy. No gingers for me.
Perhaps that doesn't apply to all Gingers.  Just the ones that would date you in the first place.  ;)
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on February 10, 2022, 02:13:04 PM
A little thread drift here, but if women want to be taken seriously and treated equally, they should give up make-up and hair dye.  If they want to use those tools to gain an advantage, have at it, but don't blame men for viewing you as a sex object.  As Dilbert once said, he'll stop lying when women stop using make-up.

That said, I have no problem with women that want to be viewed as a sex object, but I'm probably not going to make them President of my company, or Vice President of the United States for that matter.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: nddons on February 10, 2022, 02:37:13 PM
Perhaps that doesn't apply to all Gingers.  Just the ones that would date you in the first place.  ;)
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/XyDByNPzosrQNRaVMP/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on February 10, 2022, 04:04:06 PM
A little thread drift here, but if women want to be taken seriously and treated equally, they should give up make-up and hair dye.  If they want to use those tools to gain an advantage, have at it, but don't blame men for viewing you as a sex object.  As Dilbert once said, he'll stop lying when women stop using make-up.

That said, I have no problem with women that want to be viewed as a sex object, but I'm probably not going to make them President of my company, or Vice President of the United States for that matter.

Men viewing women as sex objects is kind of the biological point. Just like women view men as resource generators. A million years of evolution isn’t wiped out by one century of birth control.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on February 10, 2022, 04:11:33 PM
Men viewing women as sex objects is kind of the biological point. Just like women view men as resource generators. A million years of evolution isn’t wiped out by one century of birth control.
I'm good with that.
I'm VERY good with that. 
And I like women that understand that and are good with it.

My target was women that want it both ways.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President-Elect Bob Noel on February 10, 2022, 05:23:44 PM

My target was women that want it both ways.

um
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Username on February 10, 2022, 05:26:35 PM
Every one I’ve dated was batshit crazy. No gingers for me.
About 10 / 10 on the Crazy Hot scale.  Batshit crazy with no soul, but fun if you survive.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Little Joe on February 10, 2022, 05:43:11 PM
um
If you're thinking what I think you're thinking, that is not what I was thinking.  But I think I could think that.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Rush on February 10, 2022, 05:49:48 PM
If you're thinking what I think you're thinking, that is not what I was thinking.  But I think I could think that.

It took me a minute but I think I started thinking what you think he was thinking that wasn’t what you were thinking until now you think you could think that and now I think I could think that too.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Old Crow on February 10, 2022, 07:08:58 PM
We need a 'laugh' icon next to the 'like'. 
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on February 10, 2022, 07:53:18 PM
I was thinking what you both might have been thinking before you even were thinking it, I think.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Anthony on February 11, 2022, 03:59:52 AM
About 10 / 10 on the Crazy Hot scale.  Batshit crazy with no soul, but fun if you survive.

I'm here.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on February 11, 2022, 04:55:55 AM
My wife uses dark auburn.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: Mr Pou on February 11, 2022, 05:39:58 AM
Salma Hayek
Catherine Zeta Jones
Sandra Bullock
Jennifer Garner
Our Rush

Add Rebecca Ferguson, Cobie Smulders

Give me a few minutes and I can think of many more killer brunettes.
Title: Re: Tulsi
Post by: President-Elect Bob Noel on February 11, 2022, 05:50:34 AM
I was thinking what you both might have been thinking before you even were thinking it, I think.

I know you think you understand what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what I said was not what I meant.