Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I sincerely hope it was an oversight. Censoring artists in any way due to their political views is reprehensible.Yet that is their (Hollywood and leftists’) stock in trade. Certainly this isn’t a surprise to you, is it?
You want to know how effective walls are try asking the Chinese. Can't believe you guys think potential immigrants can't build ladders. Or use ropes. Or dig. Or blast.I can’t believe you don’t read current events. Israel has very effective walls that have been 99% effective.
I'm completely serious.
In my opinion ya'll are just bitching about a fact of life in a multi-gender force. Folks have sex, women get pregnant. The insinuation seems to be that women shouldn't serve. Or maybe shouldn't serve on ships? Or maybe shouldn't serve in combat roles? Or maybe shouldn't serve in front-line combat roles? Not sure, few of you will actually state, with detail, your vision of women in the military. You're all just picking at the edges - "women are different than men", "progressives just want equality at any cost", "pregnancy on a ship has a taxpayer cost"...
Well, pardon my French, but no shit! Quit beating around the bush and tell us part 2 of your point - you have a complaint, now what do we do about it?
Because if the insinuation is that women shouldn't serve on ships, I'd like to know how you intend to replace the 24+ THOUSAND non-pregnant women serving on ships as we speak (2015 numbers). Or at the very least, the metrics that lead to your belief that women serving on ships is a net negative to the force.
That's what I'm getting at about a meaningful comment. Just stating that something has a cost is not meaningful.
Just to be sure - you are happy they recommend to eliminate the policies that exclude women? Because this isn’t a media report, it is the US Army.And here I thought we were talking about military readiness, and not “opportunities” from a Diversity Commission.
If you mean generally, then I agree. But if you want to talk individuals, I can introduce you to quite a few women which can kick all our butts. Looking at individual people, there are many women who can not only pull their weight in combat positions, but will do it better than many men.This is all I need to know. From the article:
As far as POWs go, that ship sailed a long time ago. There were female POws in WW-II and Vietnam, but if you want something current, here’s the Amry’s take on whether or not women are ready for this.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.army.mil/article-amp/54136/female_pows_prove_women_can_endure_wars_hardships
The right often is incensed at the left for being offended on behalf of others. Today’s women do not need you to protect them.
I wouldn't call 15-17% pregnancy rates for women on ships as "horrible" or an "unintended" consequence. Sailors doing the dirty and women getting pregnant is a given, especially cooped up on a ship. This comes with the territory of a mixed-gender force, and progress can be made tailoring the logistics to lower the pregnancy rate.Now come asechrest. I was kind of tracking with you on this issue until this post. I think you’re either being naive or haven’t read about the impact of a significant number of women getting pregnant on ships.
Pregnancy is a part of life. Only women can get pregnant. Stating these facts doesn't come close to proving that women in the force is a net negative. Especially when the Navy already pulls sailors off of shore leave early because critical billets are unfilled.
What could possibly go wrong there?Took the words right out of my mouth.
We have a high-schooler in congress.Dude, that’s so wack.
Even though young men have been greatly feminized these days, I still think that if you draft 100 random millennial males and 100 random millennial females and run them through boot camp, many more women will wash out (assuming standards aren't lowered). At some point, if enough women wash out, then it doesn't make sense to keep taking in equal numbers. So an equal draft is probably not a good idea.
I say get rid of the draft and improve conditions and benefits to draw enough volunteers that have a chance of meeting the physical requirements. If that means 10 women for every 100 men are accepted, then we are probably getting the best of both.
She literally Instagrammed from her new apartment today? "Literally?"Literally!
https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1099854063196352512
He’s your typical progressive elitist. He can make derogatory comments towards minority’s and his audience applauds, and the msm looks the other way.Where’s Johnny Carson when you need him.? Same with Jay Leno. They knew it was foolish and counterproductive to shit on half of your potential audience.
Wow. Such arrogance, such contempt.I despise that prick.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1099383887770206210Fuckin A, Woods. I love that guy. He tells it like it is, always.
The number and scope of the felonies committed is astounding. If this was someone outside of the deep state cabal they would be facing years behind bars.And the two tiered justice system has nothing to do with race or sex. It has to do with the deep state primarily, and the color of your jersey secondarily.
Instead the perpetrators are going on book tours and speaking engagements.
Folks, welcome to the two tiered justice system.
