Post by: Lucifer on October 15, 2018, 11:23:07 AM
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/15/warren-releases-dna-test/
Post by: Anthony on October 15, 2018, 11:26:01 AM
She used a fake claim of being Indian to get preferential treatment. That's fraud.
Post by: bflynn on October 15, 2018, 12:21:11 PM
So in addition to claiming a native american bloodline, she is also claiming to be one of the oldest families in the US.
I think I'd like to see some ancestral tracing.
Post by: Anthony on October 15, 2018, 12:46:32 PM
Post by: Lucifer on October 15, 2018, 01:27:10 PM
Someone in the ancestry field researched this and reports that adding in Lizzie's current age, 10 generations ago was sometime between 1610 to 1640. That is basically the Pilgrims.
So in addition to claiming a native american bloodline, she is also claiming to be one of the oldest families in the US.
I think I'd like to see some ancestral tracing.
She claims her mother was Cherokee and that her father's family rejected their marriage. ::) :o
https://news.grabien.com/story-flashback-elizabeth-warren-says-her-parents-had-elope-becaus
Post by: Lucifer on October 15, 2018, 02:53:48 PM
Quote
"A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, who ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage."
- Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.
https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/cherokee-nation-issues-statement-on-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results
Post by: nddons on October 15, 2018, 02:55:49 PM
The only Indian in Elizabeth Warren is if she has eaten Tandoori Chicken or similar.I prefer to call her “Squats with Unions”.
Post by: Lucifer on October 15, 2018, 03:01:08 PM
I prefer to call her “Squats with Unions”.
Lie Awatha? Lying Cow? Squawks Bullshit?
Post by: acrogimp on October 15, 2018, 03:02:27 PM
And, everyone on this board is probably more Native American than 1/1024 Fauxcohantas.
'Gimp
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 15, 2018, 04:04:21 PM
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 15, 2018, 04:13:04 PM
:)
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 15, 2018, 04:21:29 PM
:) Sorry. It’s just so much fun making fun of a white liberal woman who gamed the liberals’ own victim-privilege system, displacing a supposedly real “victim” for her own gain.
Post by: Lucifer on October 15, 2018, 04:27:03 PM
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 15, 2018, 04:30:00 PM
I LOVE OUR PRESIDENT!!!
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 15, 2018, 04:36:17 PM
Post by: nddons on October 15, 2018, 06:46:43 PM
Hee!
Sent from my iPad . Squirrel!!
Post by: acrogimp on October 15, 2018, 06:46:50 PM
This was an incredibly stoopid move on her part - I am more Native American than she is and my family on my Dad's side has only been here for 150 years.
'Gimp
Post by: invflatspin on October 15, 2018, 06:58:39 PM
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 16, 2018, 06:11:21 AM
Did you see Warren’s Twitter rant yesterday? Classic!!! I predict tons more WalkAways as the embarrassment and writhing become acute.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warren-melts-down-in-wake-of-dna-disaster/
And I can’t imagine the scene in meetings of Democrat party leaders desperately trying to find a pair of Dems to run in 2020 who aren’t idiotic in some way. The Dems remind me of a circus ... with the tent fallen and everyone struggling in the folds of canvas, trying to be seen and heard, then falling flat again. (Nod to G. K. Chesterton)
Post by: Lucifer on October 16, 2018, 07:10:58 AM
Quote
Yesterday Warren released an entire campaign in an attempt to refute claims she faked her heritage to get ahead in her career. That campaign has backfired.
With just three weeks to go before the 2018 midterm elections, Warren just made herself a major topic on the left and the right. So far, Warren seems to be one of the few who thought dropping this issue into the final stretch of campaign season was a good idea.
President Obama's 2012 presidential campaign manager doesn't like the optics.
Post by: Anthony on October 16, 2018, 07:13:51 AM
Post by: Number7 on October 16, 2018, 07:58:37 AM
Progressives who think President Donald Trump is evil because he might have had it off with stormy daniels, also think bill clinton is being unfairly criticized for using his office to intimidate/force/convince women to have sex with him. The hypocrisy is so blatant that it adds proof that liberalism is a mental condition, not a political persuasion.
Lizzy Warren used her lies about being an Indian to usurp the place of people who legitimately earned those things is ignored by the mentally disturbed democrats because their sense of entitlement approves of her scam, just like many democrats (communists) approve of the lies of the academic community about the mmgw scam.
Nobody should be talking about lizzy warren's lies and pathetic attempts to spin the truth. We should be talking about the FRAUD she committed to get into harvard and receive preferential treatment denied others, because she was in the way.
Post by: acrogimp on October 16, 2018, 08:03:16 AM
This is just so awesome - with Hillary's 'Bill's accusers are not #MeToo' and 'she was an adult, not an abuse of power' comments you just can't make it up - shaping up to be a berry berry bad week to be a Dem.
Red Wave will push them over the edge and that will be ugly, the Antifa cowards will go full on street violence until a few of them get popped by normal citizens who have had enough of their nonsense and then Trump gets the public outcry to put those dogs down and we get a return to law and order.
Next 6 months will be chaotic but we'll see a lot of progress.
'Gimp
Post by: acrogimp on October 16, 2018, 08:05:13 AM
'Gimp
Post by: Anthony on October 16, 2018, 08:09:36 AM
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/12/chef-cooks-one-of-elizabeth-warrens-pow-wow-chow-fake-cherokee-recipes/
Post by: invflatspin on October 16, 2018, 08:10:21 AM
Ergo; 'we know she will have almost no Native American blood, so we'll just use the next worst thing.' Hi-lair-ee-us.
Post by: bflynn on October 16, 2018, 08:51:16 AM
Post by: nddons on October 16, 2018, 10:39:23 AM
Post by: Anthony on October 16, 2018, 10:43:40 AM
Post by: invflatspin on October 16, 2018, 11:58:56 AM
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 16, 2018, 03:14:35 PM
Post by: invflatspin on October 16, 2018, 03:17:36 PM
Post by: invflatspin on October 16, 2018, 04:00:06 PM
Color me shocked.
Post by: Lucifer on October 16, 2018, 04:01:26 PM
Well, I got banned from POA for a few days, most likely for starting a thread about this same subject. Not really sure if that is the reason as they never tell you. Anyways in my thread I was not only harsh on Warren for her claims of Native American heritage but also on Trump for acting like such a dick about it. I get so tired of hearing him call her Pocahontas and making such a big deal about it. They both represent extremes of the political spectrum that need to go away.
First of all, welcome to the board. We don't ban or moderate, say whatever the fuck you want. ;D
Warren won't let it go, even in the face of looking like a total buffoon. Her latest deal really blew up badly in her face and even the democrat leadership (ha!) want her to cool it.
I think Fauxahontas is more appropriate.
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 16, 2018, 04:11:44 PM
First of all, welcome to the board. We don't ban or moderate, say whatever the fuck you want. ;D
Warren won't let it go, even in the face of looking like a total buffoon. Her latest deal really blew up badly in her face and even the democrat leadership (ha!) want her to cool it.
I think Fauxahontas is more appropriate.
Thanks for the welcome.
I agree she does look like a buffoon. So many of the pols on both sides do. It’s sad and it’s sickening.
Post by: Rush on October 16, 2018, 07:43:07 PM
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on October 17, 2018, 03:44:52 AM
Post by: Rush on October 17, 2018, 07:34:34 AM
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 17, 2018, 08:22:11 AM
I saw they locked that thread and wondered if anyone got banned. You didn't say anything bad in the first post, unless you said something political in another post and they deleted it. To ban you only for starting the thread seems extreme. Anyhow, welcome.
More and more on POA it seems even mentioning someone involved in politics is considered being political. I am just as likely to bash Trump, Pence, or Mitch McConnell for saying or doing something stupid as I am Warren, Pelosi, or Schumer. However the mods over there think I’m being political. But they seem to be selective in their enforcement. For instance if the Defense or State Departments and their policies get bashed, it’s deemed political. Yet you can bash the FAA and its policies all day long with impunity. I know it’s an aviation board but I still think it’s a bit of a double standard.
Post by: Lucifer on October 17, 2018, 08:41:55 AM
More and more on POA it seems even mentioning someone involved in politics is considered being political. I am just as likely to bash Trump, Pence, or Mitch McConnell for saying or doing something stupid as I am Warren, Pelosi, or Schumer. However the mods over there think I’m being political. But they seem to be selective in their enforcement. For instance if the Defense or State Departments and their policies get bashed, it’s deemed political. Yet you can bash the FAA and its policies all day long with impunity. I know it’s an aviation board but I still think it’s a bit of a double standard.
If it weren't for double standards, PoA wouldn't have any standards at all. I keep seeing the familiar names over on PoA disappearing as it continues it's downward spiral.
We have an aviation board here and anyone is welcome to participate. Tell your friends, "Come on over!"
Post by: Anthony on October 17, 2018, 09:09:00 AM
They had a bit of a backlash with the beer thread closure. Lots of new threads implying beer popped up.
Is beer considered a political topic now???
Post by: Little Joe on October 17, 2018, 09:31:05 AM
Is beer considered a political topic now???Only since Kavanaugh said he likes beer.
Post by: Number7 on October 17, 2018, 09:33:45 AM
Anyone that the pansy, pathetic bed wetting mods at POA banned is probably a perfect fit here.
Pull up a chair and spill!
Post by: invflatspin on October 17, 2018, 09:38:48 AM
Only BO could make drinking beer look fay. Prolly drinks Lite beer.
Post by: Lucifer on October 17, 2018, 09:47:59 AM
(https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sk101718dAPR20181017084508.jpg)
(https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/stg101718dAPR20181017044506.jpg)
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 17, 2018, 12:24:35 PM
They had a bit of a backlash with the beer thread closure. Lots of new threads implying beer popped up.
A lot of fun was had on the beer threads but the mods were not amused even though the puns were flowing both ways and good naturedly so.
Post by: Lucifer on October 17, 2018, 12:42:01 PM
A lot of fun was had on the beer threads but the mods were not amused even though the puns were flowing both ways and good naturedly so.
Isn't fun one of the items that violate their ROC?
Post by: nddons on October 17, 2018, 12:54:06 PM
Isn't fun one of the items that violate their ROC?I think it’s now called the Front Porch of Aviation, if your Front Porch is at Wellesley College.
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 17, 2018, 12:55:34 PM
A lot of fun was had on the beer threads but the mods were not amused even though the puns were flowing both ways and good naturedly so.Some of those puns and posts on the beer thread were epic, really! When I check POA, I always look first for locked threads as they are the most interesting.
Post by: Number7 on October 17, 2018, 06:58:34 PM
That's really all it was about. Mari hated people discussing the gay marriage, lesbian wedding cake and other homo friendly topics and not confining themselves to only posting things she wanted to hear. To pretend some illusion of non-bias, they go after every thread in which a non-flaming queer, or non-democrat has an opinion.
The double standard would make chuck you schumer proud, but double standards are the only standard those clowns have.
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on October 17, 2018, 08:40:16 PM
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 17, 2018, 08:52:00 PM
It's sad what the bed wetting, pansy moderators did to POA, but once they gave their resident lesbian the hammer, they were going to have to sit back and watch her use it to make herself feel special for being a lesbian and allow her to punish every one else for not reminding her of how special she is.
That's really all it was about. Mari hated people discussing the gay marriage, lesbian wedding cake and other homo friendly topics and not confining themselves to only posting things she wanted to hear. To pretend some illusion of non-bias, they go after every thread in which a non-flaming queer, or non-democrat has an opinion.
The double standard would make chuck you schumer proud, but double standards are the only standard those clowns have.
I certainly didn’t know that part of POA history. Interesting. Heck, I didn't even know Mari is gay. But that doesn’t bother me.
Post by: Little Joe on October 18, 2018, 07:45:28 AM
I certainly didn’t know that part of POA history. Interesting. Heck, I didn't even know Mari is gay. But that doesn’t bother me.I don't know if Mari is gay or not. It is said by a few here so often that some actually believe it, but I have not seen any evidence.
It is sort of like everyone that says Shama Lamma Ding Dong is actually BrYan (with a Y), but unless they know something I don't know, that is pure speculation.
Post by: Anthony on October 18, 2018, 08:01:32 AM
I don't know if Mari is gay or not. It is said by a few here so often that some actually believe it, but I have not seen any evidence.
It is sort of like everyone that says Shama Lamma Ding Dong is actually BrYan (with a Y), but unless they know something I don't know, that is pure speculation.
I don't know either. What I DO know is that she has a far left, progressive bias, and lets it show in her moderation of posts.
Post by: Little Joe on October 18, 2018, 08:30:46 AM
I don't know either. What I DO know is that she has a far left, progressive bias, and lets it show in her moderation of posts.I agree with that 100%.
But there are a lot of straight people that fit the same category.
I don't remember using the "gay" or "queer" pejorative on someone just because you don't like or agree with them since junior high school. That was over 50 years ago.
And I'm not trying to sound like a politically correct liberal here, but who the fuck cares if she is gay or not?
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 18, 2018, 09:04:15 AM
I don't know either. What I DO know is that she has a far left, progressive bias, and lets it show in her moderation of posts.
How does one know which mod locks a thread or bans you? It almost always seems like it is done by a generic moderator account.
Post by: Lucifer on October 18, 2018, 09:11:26 AM
How does one know which mod locks a thread or bans you? It almost always seems like it is done by a generic moderator account.
The "MC" keeps that secret.
The whole MC on that site needs to be flushed.
Post by: invflatspin on October 18, 2018, 09:12:18 AM
And I'm not trying to sound like a politically correct liberal here, but who the fuck cares if she is gay or not?
Well, in my limited but memorable experience it's quite common for a gay person(generalizing here) to NEED or really WANT people to care about their sexual orientation. I may not care if a person is straight, but there have been times when not knowing someone is gay leads to awkward social interactions. IMNSHO, openly gay people tend to be a LOT more sensitive to casual conversation, or a perceived slight, or even an offhand remark that wasn't meant to be harmful, but taken as a threat. If you haven't experienced that, good for you. In a confrontation with a gay, they will often look for an excuse to demand an apology for harmless banter. To which I say 'get the fuck over yourself' or similar.
Post by: Anthony on October 18, 2018, 09:15:02 AM
I agree with that 100%.
But there are a lot of straight people that fit the same category.
I don't remember using the "gay" or "queer" pejorative on someone just because you don't like or agree with them since junior high school. That was over 50 years ago.
And I'm not trying to sound like a politically correct liberal here, but who the fuck cares if she is gay or not?
I don't care if someone is Gay either. However, in my experience Gays can be militantly, far left progressive in their thought process. Not all, I know, but many at least lean that way, and it effects their judgement greatly. Same with Vegans, and Prius driving Man Made Climate Change zealots, so it isn't just a "Gay" thing.
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 18, 2018, 09:23:45 AM
Well, in my limited but memorable experience it's quite common for a gay person(generalizing here) to NEED or really WANT people to care about their sexual orientation. I may not care if a person is straight, but there have been times when not knowing someone is gay leads to awkward social interactions. IMNSHO, openly gay people tend to be a LOT more sensitive to casual conversation, or a perceived slight, or even an offhand remark that wasn't meant to be harmful, but taken as a threat. If you haven't experienced that, good for you. In a confrontation with a gay, they will often look for an excuse to demand an apology for harmless banter. To which I say 'get the fuck over yourself' or similar.
I would agree that when some come out, they really, really come out and can do so in an agressive manner. But I believe they are in the minority. Of course, any group will have that sort of overly vocal, overly aggressive minority faction. Unfortunate, many folks tend to always judge the entire group by that small minority. That is a large contributor to the pervasive divisiveness that permeates our society.
Post by: invflatspin on October 18, 2018, 09:39:57 AM
I would agree that when some come out, they really, really come out and can do so in an agressive manner. But I believe they are in the minority. Of course, any group will have that sort of overly vocal, overly aggressive minority faction. Unfortunate, many folks tend to always judge the entire group by that small minority. That is a large contributor to the pervasive divisiveness that permeates our society.
Well, I'm not sure about the 'small minority' part of your statement, but have no evidence to the contrary. As for being divisive in a society, I would say I'm a big fan of individualism. but - being an iconic member of a small minority doesn't mean I need or will adapt my behavior for the petty dictates of said small minority. If they want to be taken as they are, then I insist on the same respect. I'm here, I'm straight, get over yourself already.
Post by: Rush on October 18, 2018, 09:43:45 AM
Post by: Little Joe on October 18, 2018, 09:55:14 AM
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 19, 2018, 07:03:33 AM
"I just find the whole thing bizarre. Her claiming she is part Native American to gain personal and political advantage and Trump calling her Pocahontas in a derisively bigoted manner. I just don’t get it. And it has nothing to do with either one’s political affiliation."
And here is the rule they say I violated.
"Political/Religious discussions are prohibited. This includes any language or discussion deemed to be political or politically charged in nature as well as any religious speech or text. This language is exceedingly destructive to the cohesion of the community and as such will not be tolerated."
So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
Post by: Anthony on October 19, 2018, 07:06:33 AM
So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
It is confusing. I assume it no longer matters to the MC that you are non-partisan, as just any reference to politics is no longer allowed. Even though personal flying by its nature is political as we must deal with so much government regulation, and polices.
Post by: Lucifer on October 19, 2018, 07:16:34 AM
Well, my ban on POA was lifted today and I was finally able to read the message that the mods sent me regarding my ban and the statement below is what got me banned.
"I just find the whole thing bizarre. Her claiming she is part Native American to gain personal and political advantage and Trump calling her Pocahontas in a derisively bigoted manner. I just don’t get it. And it has nothing to do with either one’s political affiliation."
And here is the rule they say I violated.
"Political/Religious discussions are prohibited. This includes any language or discussion deemed to be political or politically charged in nature as well as any religious speech or text. This language is exceedingly destructive to the cohesion of the community and as such will not be tolerated."
So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
You know discussing bans is against their ROC..........
We'll see if that expands to other boards. ;)
Post by: asechrest on October 19, 2018, 07:39:55 AM
Well, my ban on POA was lifted today and I was finally able to read the message that the mods sent me regarding my ban and the statement below is what got me banned.
"I just find the whole thing bizarre. Her claiming she is part Native American to gain personal and political advantage and Trump calling her Pocahontas in a derisively bigoted manner. I just don’t get it. And it has nothing to do with either one’s political affiliation."
And here is the rule they say I violated.
"Political/Religious discussions are prohibited. This includes any language or discussion deemed to be political or politically charged in nature as well as any religious speech or text. This language is exceedingly destructive to the cohesion of the community and as such will not be tolerated."
So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
I have reported this post for talking about talking about politics. Enjoy your ban! ;)
Post by: nddons on October 19, 2018, 07:45:29 AM
Well, my ban on POA was lifted today and I was finally able to read the message that the mods sent me regarding my ban and the statement below is what got me banned.Given the number of POA refugees here at PS, I’m thinking their “cohesion of the community” seems to becoming unglued.
"I just find the whole thing bizarre. Her claiming she is part Native American to gain personal and political advantage and Trump calling her Pocahontas in a derisively bigoted manner. I just don’t get it. And it has nothing to do with either one’s political affiliation."
And here is the rule they say I violated.
"Political/Religious discussions are prohibited. This includes any language or discussion deemed to be political or politically charged in nature as well as any religious speech or text. This language is exceedingly destructive to the cohesion of the community and as such will not be tolerated."
So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
Post by: Anthony on October 19, 2018, 07:47:48 AM
Post by: acrogimp on October 19, 2018, 08:01:13 AM
I have not been back since our original exodus and I haven't missed it even once - that kind of lopsided and misguided censorship never results in goodness, I have seen it before and I always leave when that bullshit happens.
'Gimp
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 19, 2018, 08:27:01 AM
You know discussing bans is against their ROC..........
We'll see if that expands to other boards. ;)
I have reported this post for talking about talking about politics. Enjoy your ban! ;)
LOL. I am assuming that their no talking about bans policy only applies to posts on POA but hell what the fuck do I now? I am too fucking stupid to even understand what is considered political. Damn, it's nice to write the word "fuck" and not "frack"
With such nonsense continuing I seriously don't understand why any of you still bother to go there.
I have not been back since our original exodus and I haven't missed it even once - that kind of lopsided and misguided censorship never results in goodness, I have seen it before and I always leave when that bullshit happens.
'Gimp
Well, they still currently have a lot more aviation discussions going on and many of them can be good so they do have that going for them. It would be nice to see the aviation side of this board pick up. Until that happens I'm sure many of us will bounce back and forth.
Post by: Lucifer on October 19, 2018, 09:09:37 AM
Well, they still currently have a lot more aviation discussions going on and many of them can be good so they do have that going for them. It would be nice to see the aviation side of this board pick up. Until that happens I'm sure many of us will bounce back and forth.
Spread the word and have more come over and post aviation content here.
Post by: Number7 on October 19, 2018, 04:53:49 PM
I stopped going there due to the bigotry and insane hypocrisy of the mods and haven’t missed their mis management council ignorance.
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 19, 2018, 05:27:47 PM
Spread the word and have more come over and post aviation content here.
I’m going to bounce back and forth between here and there for awhile and toss in a plug for this site when it fits into the conversation. Not sure how much good I can do. I’m not a major influencer over there but I’ll give it a go.
Post by: Little Joe on October 20, 2018, 04:32:40 AM
You were being highly partisan.
. . . So I guess saying that two politicians ,one from each side, are being stupid is deemed as being political. And here I thought I was being nonpartisan.
To a liberal, if you say ANYthing critical of liberals, OR anything positive regarding conservatives, you have left the reservation and are no longer considered "one of us".
If you can't see that, you must watch too much FOX or listen to too much Rush and that cannot be tolerated.
Post by: Anthony on October 20, 2018, 04:46:22 AM
You were being highly partisan.
To a liberal, if you say ANYthing critical of liberals, OR anything positive regarding conservatives, you have left the reservation and are no longer considered "one of us".
If you can't see that, you must watch too much FOX or listen to too much Rush and that cannot be tolerated.
Exactly. You could be critical of both parties, and be totally non-partisan in what you say, but the one side will always take offense. They believe liberal/progressives are above criticism, and the ends justify the means as their intent is so good for society. Their "purpose" is so altruistic, that it is above all else, and any means to get their, including violence is OK. No, I am not saying POA advocates violence, I am talking about liberals, and Democrats (same thing) in general. Look at Holder, and Hillary's comments recently.
Post by: SkyDog58 on October 20, 2018, 03:02:46 PM
Wow. I just must be reading from a different playbook than everyone else. Well at least here I won’t be castigated or flogged for it. Though I must admit to enjoying an occasional mild flogging.
;)
Post by: Number7 on October 20, 2018, 03:12:29 PM
Post by: Lucifer on October 20, 2018, 04:49:07 PM
Wow. I just must be reading from a different playbook than everyone else. Well at least here I won’t be castigated or flogged for it. Though I must admit to enjoying an occasional mild flogging.
;)
Post by: Rush on October 20, 2018, 05:16:25 PM
Wow. I just must be reading from a different playbook than everyone else. Well at least here I won’t be castigated or flogged for it. Though I must admit to enjoying an occasional mild flogging.
;)
Pervert. ;D
Post by: bflynn on October 22, 2018, 05:34:53 AM
(http://www.pilotspin.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3016.0;attach=783)
Post by: Lucifer on October 26, 2018, 07:15:51 AM
Post by: Anthony on October 26, 2018, 01:55:06 PM
Wow. I just must be reading from a different playbook than everyone else. Well at least here I won’t be castigated or flogged for it. Though I must admit to enjoying an occasional mild flogging.
;)
No you WILL be flogged for it. If you spout Liberal/Progressive nonsense you will be called out on it. The difference is you can say ANYTHING you want, and express whatever view you want. It will be interesting to see if you can back up anything with facts, evidence, and logic.
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on November 01, 2018, 06:43:40 AM
But sadly, I see in the comments the expectation that she will win. “Yeah, but this is MA we are talking about, you can leave a woman to drown and still be elected to the Senate for the rest of your life- lies and corruption isn’t gonna bother those voters.”
>:(
https://mobile.twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1057855770455408642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1057855770455408642&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdisqus.com%2Fembed%2Fcomments%2F%3Fbase%3Ddefault%26f%3Dmotustestdisqus%26t_u%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.michellesmirror.com%252F2018%252F11%252Fthe-long-goodbye.html%26t_d%3DMOTUS%2520A.D.%253A%2520The%2520Long%2520GoodBye%26t_t%3DMOTUS%2520A.D.%253A%2520The%2520Long%2520GoodBye%26s_o%3Ddefault%23version%3Ddae8e5c8d42201f620096f28339a75d0