PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Ron22 on December 23, 2021, 10:32:28 AM

Title: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Ron22 on December 23, 2021, 10:32:28 AM
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kamala-harris-gripes-media-coverage-better-white-man

Quote
Vice President Kamala Harris is reportedly expressing discontent with the news coverage surrounding her performance as the nation's second-highest office holder, citing her race and gender.

According to a piece by The New York Times, Harris has been privately complaining to her allies that the media's coverage of her would be better if she were any of her 48 White male predecessors, and has reportedly confided in them about the difficulties she's facing with her assigned portfolio from the White House

Funny since the only reason she was picked was because of race and gender.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Old Crow on December 23, 2021, 10:57:07 AM
Her media coverage would be much better for her IF she was competent!
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Little Joe on December 23, 2021, 10:57:53 AM
IF she were a white man, she would be treated like GWB or DJT.
I don't think she'd like that too much.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Rush on December 23, 2021, 11:02:12 AM
She should be thanking the media. Her abominable performance at her job is the reason she’s not getting coverage because the media is protecting her.  Not that they like her, but criticizing her makes you racist. If you can’t say anything nice…

As for her race and gender, we have established that she is predominantly white and very likely not from the poor class of white at that, and the female part if anything gets you preferential treatment these days.

The reason she isn’t included in important decisions is because when they gave her a huge and important task, the border, she did absolutely nothing with it, not even a good pretend optic. Just a pathetic one, too little too late. Why would they give her any other decision making power?

She is just like the stupid and incompetent women I knew in the corporate world who bitched that they were discriminated against because of their gender when the truth was they were discriminated against because they were inferior performers.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: nddons on December 23, 2021, 06:29:49 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-kamala-harris-gripes-media-coverage-better-white-man

Funny since the only reason she was picked was because of race and gender.
Bingo.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: bflynn on December 24, 2021, 12:26:54 AM
Let’s be fair - her only real job is to breathe. All the rest is just an attempt to groom her to be president, which her handlers suck at doing.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Anthony on December 24, 2021, 03:45:46 AM
Let’s be fair - her only real job is to breathe. All the rest is just an attempt to groom her to be president, which her handlers suck at doing.

Breathe and not say such stupid stuff and fuck up to the point the MEDIA can't cover it up.  She's the biggest loser to sit in that seat in history and her "boss" is just as bad.  Totally embarrassing and a friggin joke.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: nddons on December 24, 2021, 09:06:20 AM
Breathe and not say such stupid stuff and fuck up to the point the MEDIA can't cover it up.  She's the biggest loser to sit in that seat in history and her "boss" is just as bad.  Totally embarrassing and a friggin joke.
Can you imagine if the Dems put HER up as the flag bearer for the 2024 presidential election?  If not for his age, Kyle Rittenhouse could beat her.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: President-Elect Bob Noel on December 24, 2021, 09:43:47 AM
Can you imagine if the Dems put HER up as the flag bearer for the 2024 presidential election?  If not for his age, Kyle Rittenhouse could beat her.

hillary in 2016, the clown in 2020, why is it hard to imagine cammie in 2024?

Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Little Joe on December 24, 2021, 09:48:09 AM
Can you imagine if the Dems put HER up as the flag bearer for the 2024 presidential election?  If not for his age, Kyle Rittenhouse could beat her.
Can’t Kyle just identify as being older?
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: bflynn on December 24, 2021, 12:52:04 PM
Breathe and not say such stupid stuff and fuck up to the point the MEDIA can't cover it up.  She's the biggest loser to sit in that seat in history and her "boss" is just as bad.  Totally embarrassing and a friggin joke.

I submit the guy two administrations ago was worse.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: nddons on December 24, 2021, 01:20:01 PM
I submit the guy two administrations ago was worse.
Well played, sir!
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Anthony on December 25, 2021, 06:03:50 AM
I submit the guy two administrations ago was worse.

Obama?  Yeah, especially the bowing to foreign leaders and Fundamental Transformation. 
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Mr Pou on December 25, 2021, 06:31:19 AM
Obama?  Yeah, especially the bowing to foreign leaders and Fundamental Transformation.

And he's not involved now? Yeah, right.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: nddons on December 25, 2021, 06:39:54 AM
Obama?  Yeah, especially the bowing to foreign leaders and Fundamental Transformation.
I think he was talking about Obama’s VP being worse than Kameltoe.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Mr Pou on December 25, 2021, 06:44:30 AM
I think he was talking about Obama’s VP being worse than Kameltoe.

Ah, ok. Still,, that one is too close to call, both useful (to the Dems) idiots.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Rush on December 25, 2021, 07:37:15 AM
I think he was talking about Obama’s VP being worse than Kameltoe.

Ah!  That makes sense.  I wasn’t getting it.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: Lucifer on December 25, 2021, 09:52:08 AM
From a newsletter I get:

Quote
As more polls show the Rutabaga tanking, people are coming to the realization there are only two scenarios in which to view his current troubles: either he got 81 million votes and has the most disastrous decline in American peacetime history, or he didn’t get 81 million legitimate votes, and the polls are showing where he’s always been.

There are two and only two scenarios:

1) Biden got 81M legitimate votes and then had the most rapid poll swing downward in history in peacetime.

2) Biden didn't get 81M legitimate votes and the current polls are at or near what his actual level of support always has been.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: bflynn on December 25, 2021, 12:34:13 PM
Yes, "the guy from the last administration" was the VP who had his son openly take bribes in his name and used the power of his office to intervene against a foreign federal investigator who was investigating his son for those bribes. 

So yeah, Obama's VP is way worse than Biden's.  Kamala needs to up her game if she wants to be the worst VP ever.
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: President in Exile YOLT on December 25, 2021, 07:51:37 PM
Obama?  Yeah, especially the bowing to foreign leaders and Fundamental Transformation.
(https://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/5/57/Obamabow.jpg/400px-Obamabow.jpg)
Title: Re: Kamala Harris media coverage
Post by: nddons on December 17, 2022, 04:06:18 PM
Once again the Bee never fails to deliver:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmM5NJJNvaS/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY=