PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on January 05, 2024, 02:41:27 PM
-
For islamophobia for condemning the hamas slaughter of Jewish citizens.
Fuck those fucking assholes.
Scum sucking, bottom dwelling, motherfucking commies that they are.
Stronger message to follow.
Ever wonder why Harvard's now-ex-president, Claudine Gay, could have such a hard time condemning calls for genocide against Jews in her congressional testimony?
Sure, part of it, as she said, was that she "got caught up" with her questioner, GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik, whom she obviously thinks has cooties.
The other part, though, might be this, as Campus Reform reports:
The Biden administration’s Department of Education opened an investigation into San Diego State University after an administrator sent an email condemning Hamas and offering support after the Oct. 7 terrorist attack, according to a school official.
Or, it is more likely that the fucking democrat party has been disguising their hatred of Christians and Jews, but doesn't feel the need anymore.
Nothing says bigot like democrat.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/12/28/company-claims-it-will-replace-humans-on-tv-news-with-ai-generated-anchors/
-
I have never in my life understood why American Jews support Democrats.
I have hope, faint though it is, that they will wake up and stop supporting those anti semitics.
-
I have never in my life understood why American Jews support Democrats.
I have hope, faint though it is, that they will wake up and stop supporting those anti semitics.
Communism and what they FEEL is the greater good is in their DNA. Could be that many of them came from Russia and Eastern Europe after being slaughtered by the authoritarian Russians and Fascists they now emulate. Weird and inexplicable.
Also, they are Urbanites and want to think of themselves as enlightened, intellectuals. We all know where that goes. More Communism.
-
I have never in my life understood why American Jews support Democrats.
I once asked Steingar that question and to the best of my recollection he said something like because the Jewish people feel strongly about taking care of those in need and that fits with the Democrat policies around safety nets for the poor, or compassion for those less fortunate or something along those lines.
That makes complete sense when you’re talking about sincere Democrats that actually are altruistic. But I don’t believe the Democrats in power (the likes of Biden, Pelosi, AOC, etc.) give two shits about people less fortunate.
This is also the basis of leftist economic ideology (socialism, communism) where the more productive and more fortunate share and take care of the unfortunate. This necessitates a system without private property rights. This kind of system works well on the family and tribal level, and the Jewish people have considered themselves a closed “commune” if you will (such as not marrying outside their circle).
The trouble is, this kind of system doesn’t work at all at the nation state level, or for purposes of allocating resources between small groups or tribes. For that you need trade, and for that you need private ownership of property and goods and a profit motive. The Jewish people are actually quite good at that, rising in the ranks of wealth in capitalist systems but retaining their compassionate idealism in how they vote. This sounds hypocritical but it may be less hypocrisy than simply generational habit, much like blacks got stuck in multi-generational loops of voting Democrat. They may feel they’re doing their part to take care of the poor by voting for leftist policies.
People who vote for leftist wealth redistribution policies come in two basic types: those who use a cloak of fake compassion to gain power for themselves, and those who actually believe policies such as welfare help people but are too stupid and/or uneducated to understand that in reality it has the opposite effect, or, are smart and educated but have certain blind spots.
Jews on average (particularly the Ashkenazi) have higher intelligence than the U.S. average and so like all people with higher IQs fall prey to thinking they actually are more enlightened, and then they go to universities and get brainwashed with leftist ideology that has been taking over our universities since the 1950s. Having a high IQ allows you to structure complex mental models of how the world “should” work, but doesn’t actually mean you are right and that they would in fact work in the real world. All you have to do is be wrong about one of your basic premises and your entire theory falls apart.
Leftists have one or more blind spots with their basic premises. One of them is that the size of the economic pie is fixed. Another is that what works on the family level can work at the nation state level.
Yet another, and possibly the most insidious, is thinking that one’s action on a problem has only the effect you intend, when in reality your action changes the behavior of the subject and so can backfire and have the opposite effect you wanted. Providing safety nets from starvation lowers motivation to work and be productive, and ends up perpetuating and growing the problem rather than solving it.
Foreseeing unintended consequences is a talent few people possess, even those with high intelligence. Lawmakers miss the boat on that one in nearly everything they do.
-
By and large, most lefties are inherently, painfully selfish, jealous, and self-centered. Once they accept and absorb the brainwashing, their mindset becomes one in which what they think they want is THE ONLY right solution, and using lawfare to end any push back against their private, selfish, agenda is not only necessary, but required.
I am always amused when supposedly compassionate lefties join in the chorus, 'from the river to the sea,' without a shred of awareness that their bigotry is exactly what they believe themselves to be fighting against. The hypocrisy of lefties is sometime so shocking that it is better described as mental illness.
liberalism always seems to devolve into violence. Why is that? Because liberals at their core are supporting violent and extreme submission to an agenda that appeals to their vanity, greed, and selfishness.
Typically liberals are driven by their need for attention, coupled with their hatred of those who succeed and the results of their labor is obvious by the size of their homes, and price of their toys. The jealousy driving liberals is all about justifying taking from those who earned it and keeping t for themselves, not sharing it with the less fortunate.
Have you ever heard of black lived matters giving anything away except lies, blackmail, and violence?
Nope, and it helps you understand what drives liberalism.
When did antifa ever set up feeding stations for the hungry, shelter for the homeless, or give care for abandoned, neglected, or abused children?
When I volunteer after hurricanes and tornadoes, floods and stuff, I have never once seen a table provided and staffed by any far left organization even though they constantly claim moral superiority. Their concept of superiority is all about taking and keeping, not giving and sharing.
The dichotomy that liberals comfortably live with has to be a legitimate form of mental illness. Just like liberals that demand all kinds of bullshit in the name of, 'it's for the children,' then riot because they can't have expanded abortion rights, the hypocrisy is far beyond behavior and into pathology.
-
Also, and weirdly, Judaism is not a very loving religion. It is dry and filled with requirements that essentially are meaningless. Adherence is valued and respected over actual results. While this can be true of any religion, generally Christianity provides a more loving and accepting (not “tolerant;” that’s a whole other animal) set of tenets that actually lead to human flourishing when followed.
It was a Jew, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who perfected and pioneered abortion, and thus mass murder, setting up clinics and performing thousands of abortions before his conversion to Catholicism and his pivot to pro-life causes.
Yet the Holocaust, also mass murder, did much to enshrine the word “antisemitic” in human consciousness as something that should be tabu, and even the tiniest instance of it denounced and punished because of the sufferings of Jews under Hitler. But this tends to excuse almost any behavior by Jews subsequently, and many Jews in positions of power have behaved very badly. Yet they cry persecution if criticized and everyone, including the media, rushes to apologize and scuttles away chastised. Hence many corrupt Jews remain in power endlessly.
Democrats always identify with the persecuted, unless the persecuted are people who believe in freedom, the Constitution, and values that truly promote human flourishing.
-
liberalism always seems to devolve into violence. Why is that? Because liberals at their core are supporting violent and extreme submission to an agenda that appeals to their vanity, greed, and selfishness.
The dichotomy that liberals comfortably live with has to be a legitimate form of mental illness. Just like liberals that demand all kinds of bullshit in the name of, 'it's for the children,' then riot because they can't have expanded abortion rights, the hypocrisy is far beyond behavior and into pathology.
My comment above is proven b the responses to John Fetterman admitting that harvard has always been far left.
And the reviews from the left are POURING in…
One I particularly call your attention to is the one cheering for a fatal blood clot because he spoke unapproved facts. It makes me think of mikey cheering for us all to die of covid because we dared to disagree when he ordered everyone to run out and take the scam vaccine.
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2024/01/05/fetterm-continues-to-surprise-with-terrific-take-on-harvards-failure-n2168353
-
liberalism always seems to devolve into violence. Why is that? Because liberals at their core are supporting violent and extreme submission to an agenda that appeals to their vanity, greed, and selfishness.
Economic leftism must involve violence and the ever present threat of violence. This is because redistribution of wealth involves taking privately earned wealth from those who labored for it. When you are not allowed to keep what you worked for, it is your time - your hours and days of a limited life - that is taken which is a form of slavery. And slavery must be enforced with physical and psychological violence.
Leftists as you say, at their core support violence because their vanity has them believing that their views are superior to others’, and they are justified in using force to get their way.
-
Rush, Becky and N7 nailed it totally. Thanks guys. Really sums it up.
-
Rush, Becky and N7 nailed it totally. Thanks guys. Really sums it up.
De nada. ;D