Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Because she used it as ablidgeon against people who dared to voice an opinion different from hers and it was a big part of why the board is a joke.If you don't like POA then don't visit it or participate there. But your continual references to her sexual orientation are pejorative and petulant.
OK, get the fork back out. He's cooked.I'm not sure what you're basing this off of. He has been accused of rape, been called evil, and had his family and his name dragged through the mud. Of course he's angry and of course he's fighting back. Wouldn't you?
This confirmation process has become a national disgrace.
...
You have replaced advice and consent with search and destroy.
Let's see...
DROUGHT... What party controls cali-forn-i-mexico? They haven't drilled wells, addressed their need for increased irrigation to increase crops, to provide food for all those illegal aliens they seem to embrace.
Oh, yeah... They haven't built power plants that addresses their exponential increased need for electricity.
Yep... You are full of shit, mike. Your post is all partisan sniping and nothing factual.
Congratulations. you helped prove my point about the mental illness that surrounds the democratic party and it's cult followers, like you.
Then how could they restrict the free exchange of ideas and risk mari being offended every time someone didn't cater to her narrow minded bullshit opinions? Seriously they destroyed the board because mari couldn't leave any discussion alone and then got pissy because people had a different opinion from hers. She needed to go over to the purple board and be a snowflake over there.I really hope you see the irony in this.
...thus safety the lesbian progressive moderator...What does someone's sexual orientation have to do with anything? I can see the political leanings impacting how they moderate, especially in the wake of the Spin Zone being shut down.
Asshole, coward lefties don't think. They emote. And robby-boy doesn't read his own mail.I hope you realize the irony of your two sentences.
Just for fun i put my real name, personal email and home address on the letter, hoping for one of those automatic replies that they are famous for at the department of lies and injustice.
You are all welcome to come see me on visiting day at GITMO.
So are you implying that everyone must agree with Mr. McCarthy's positions?Of course not, but you're dodging my question and not addressing the other points. You brought up a few points in your reply to my post, and as I showed you, most of those were addressed in the article.
AG Sessions should be running the DoJ, not Rod Rosenstein. You'll come back with a snarky reply and claim that he is, but the reality is Rod Rosenstein is actually running the DoJ. This has been stated by several members of congress as well as other branches of government that deal with the DoJ.Was this stated as conjecture or as a statement of evidence? Because I'm not sure what Rod Rosenstein is running outside of the special counsel investigation.
The Special Counsel investigation is a farce and is purely politically motivated.I tend to agree with this and it's true for any special counsel, not just this one. I would like to see the memo that Rosenstein issued to Mueller outlining his guidance for what to investigate.
I don't think it's extreme at all. Democrats have been unbelievably hostile to every Trump nominee so far. They have blocked or delayed almost everyone, then they complain that Trump hasn't filled all the seats yet. While Trump is trying to navigate real problems, like North Korea stabilization, China Trade, Russian interference in Syria and all the other problems, he is having to fight Democrats and Never-Trumpers on every front. Then, while he fighting off all their partisan attacks, they are accusing him of creating chaos in the white house. Trump, and America, are suffering death by a thousand cuts from the Democrats. I just hope he get a few more judges seated before the Dems succeed in destroying him and us.Your argument is that Trump is fighting the good fight and everyone else is just standing in his way? I hope you can recognize that some, and certainly not all, of the problems inside the White House are Trump's own doing through his tweets, his changing statements on subjects, etc.
Your arguments are without merit, and are oblivious to the facts.Incorrect. There is no clause in the legal definition of treason that includes the president or his administration. I don't know if you read legal definition in the link I provided, but here it is:
An attempt to undermine the President and his administration by leaking the information from classified meetings would meet the thresh hold of treason.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Plus, there is detailed training called "Cooperating with the Inspector General" which details what the IG can do and what an employee must do in the event of an IG investigation. Trust me, if this guy (IG) or his subordinates decides to sequester (and this is a proper use of the word) an individual in a closed conference room in an attempt to get down to the facts, and that person refuses, it's a removal of all credentials and an escort off the premises by armed security. And that's only the beginning.I'm not disputing the authority of the IG to conduct an investigation. I'm not disputing that an IG can pull someone into a room to interview them or otherwise determine what's going on. The implication from your original post was that they should be detained, since to sequester usually means to isolate or hide away for a period of time. If you meant simply to interview, then I agree. If you meant to hold for any period longer than an interview, then that would be incorrect. If either one of those is not what you meant, please clarify so we're on the same page.
I’m curious why you included your third paragraph. Who’s saying he shouldn’t say what he said?You are free to ridicule it but I don't find that name calling moves the debate forward any, but that's just my opinion.
Debates and conversations imply a two way exchange. He was free to write his piece, as I am free to ridicule it as the antipathy of freedom and liberty.
What I take from you not answering my pointed questions is that you don't want to acknowledge the implicit answers in the questions. I don't believe that you are OK with a subset of society agreeing to kill some of it's members, but you can't figure out how to reconcile that with the belief that we must kill certain people. The answer is simple, we should not be killing anyone.You are over simplifying everything. First, in the modern context of "pro-life", it generally refers to the abortion debate, unless otherwise stipulated up front. I understand what the meaning of "pro-life" is (both the modern context and yours), but context is important.
The nazi party was a subset of German society that agreed it was ok to kill some people. They set up the rules for it, followed their rules and according to their rules, they were doing it the right way and to the right people. Of course we condemn this, but we cannot condemn it for any reason other than killing people is wrong. We do it all the same way, we just have much stricter rules and a lower body count.
Not getting anywhere close to the nazi party is one reason I reject capital punishment.
In typical Marxist fashion, the publicly funded indoctrination brigade CHOSE to go after the ONE who refused to violate the rules.What?
His crime was that he refused to support the MARXIST leadership, that probably belong to one of the BLM spin offs and that infuriated the junior Lenins.
I would love to see his parents sue the shit out of those responsible, instead of the school district. That would be epic.
1 Like