1741
Spin Zone / Re: Obamacare Death Spiral
« on: September 29, 2016, 04:28:34 AM »Trump has said clearly that the government will be paying for it.
Jeff, I really don't believe a thing you say anymore.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Trump has said clearly that the government will be paying for it.
Last time I was in Ga. I casually mentioned to one of the fellows I was with that there were more back people where we were than my home burb. They very rudely said that we could have them, and proceeded into a long vituperative rant about African Americans. I managed to massage the situation explaining that many of the aforementioned in my neck of the woods were Somali immigrants seeking a better life (and quickly changed the subject), but truly I had never in my life seen such naked bigotry. And this was educated fellows and pilots. I'm glad I'm in an academic situation in a northern state, I dislike discrimination and racism and am happy to hold it at arms length.Yet you felt the need, in the Deep South, to point out that there are more blacks in wherever you were in Georgia as compared to your town in Ohio. Seriously? I lived in Charlotte for 6 years, and my daughter went to vet school in Mississippi, and I have spent my fair share of time in the south. I'm not sure I would have ever asked a question like that. What exactly was the point?
Atmosphere.Maybe, but that would take decades at a minimum. Probably centuries. A test colony on the moon would help iron out a lot of the bugs and allow for the research and the technological development that will be needed at a much lower cost. The moon would make for a great proof-of-concept.
Mars has the theoretical ability of being terraformed, the moon does not.
I tend to prefer the approach that Canada uses: an independent, non-partisan elections organization that reports to parliament.
Same reason you old people want your damn social security. (Makes motion of shaking cane in the air.)
Wipe off the voter rolls every 4 years. Asking voters to re-register once every 4 years is not a burden when it comes to caring about the Republic.Excellent idea, really. I've been contemplating asechrest's assertion that voting should be as effortless as possible. I don't agree. It should be as robust as possible, and that doesn't usually happen with "easy."
Courts have established that qualified individuals have a constitutional right to vote. The proposal to "wipe the slate clean" every four years and make people re-register is essentially a mass revocation of that right from many who are known factually to be eligible. I don't see how it would ever survive the scrutiny of the courts.
So, if you agree with someone that you'll sell them your car for $5,000, and the buyer then says "I'm not paying you!" Then you're still obligated to give him your car?It wasn't a quid quo pro contract. It was a pledge to perform. Nowhere did anyone pledge to support the nominee as long as everyone else agrees to do so too.
When one side repudiates a contract, other parties are absolved from any obligation they have to the repudiating party.
On wonders what all those dead people were doing on the registration rolls. But I suppose removing the deceased from voter registrations is just too difficult.Every time I have seen an effort to clean up the registration rolls, the democrats screamed that it was an effort to disenfranchise the poor and the blacks.
Nothing like expensive solutions to nonexistent problems.
Everyone gives my father credit for the hostages going free on the day he was sworn in, and they should. But one reason they went free was because he kept the Iranians guessing.
They never did know whether he’d nuke them until he didn’t.
I find it interesting this election year that the right and the left keep asking the same questions of Trump. What will he do to defeat ISIS?
But the real story shouldn’t be what Trump might do. It should be what Hillary Clinton won’t do. To appease her voters and liberal friends in the media, she’s already said she won’t use ground troops. I’m sure the monsters who run ISIS were relieved to hear that.
He wasn't criticized by me. But before Katrina he treated FEMA like a bad entitlement program, and then found his administration unprepared to deal with the aftermath of Katrina. Perhaps even a FEMA at its best could have done little with a disaster of that proportion. The real damning thing was he was supposed to be the POTUS who would deal with terrorism, yet his administration couldn't cope with a well tracked and utterly forecast natural phenomenon. Made them appear utterly incapable of dealing with the chaotic onset of terrorism.
Seems to me that the current floods are a disaster of similar magnitude, and like I said I'm not seeing a lot about how bad the federal response is. You might all claim the media is keeping it quiet, but I doubt it. Everyone likes a story about government ineptitude, no matter who's in charge.