BTW, CNN edited a video of Hillary to take out the part where she said it was a bombing.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/boom-cnn-edits-out-hillarys-reference-to-nyc-explosion-as-a-bombing_092016

But they can't edit out the fact that she looks and sounds like a poorly engineered android.

My point was that racism is being imputed for political gain upon those who are not racist (Islamaphobe, homophobe, on and on as per HRC's revealing yet typical quote). Such accusations are merely vote farming, as are many practices of the left.

It is a leftist strategy to pick out the most dysfunctional if not literally just AWFUL person they can find who holds an ideology the left wants to attack, be it religion, political party, gender, anything, and then hold that person or tiny group up as an example of the MAJORITY of that group. 

In the same convoluted way, as PaulS said in another post, they lift up and even reward those who make dysfunctional decisions.  I have also noted that the left tries to skew laws toward the few, bringing havoc and dysfunction upon the many!  In the name of compassion!  On and on we could go.  The left has created and is still creating a parasitic society that the producers ultimately cannot bear. 

All this and more is what I am tired of, and that is what I will not be silent about.

Here is Dr. Ben Carson's response to HRC:

“In a very telling moment, Hillary Clinton maligned me and millions of other Americans as racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamophobic ‘deplorables."

“I’m so tired of this line of attack that normally taunts conservatives. Well, let me be very specific in my response. I believe in expanding opportunity, not welfare; that’s not racist."

“I believe every life is worth protecting, particularly the unborn; that doesn’t make me sexist."

“I believe marriage is between one man and one woman; that’s not homophobic."

“I believe in borders, the rule of law and our sovereign right to decide who to let into our country; that’s not xenophobic."

“I believe radical Islam is a mortal threat to America and Western civilization; that is common sense, not Islamophobia.”

You say my link is a rant against Obama.  It is not.  But he must take some responsibility for worsening race relations on his watch, promising much in that regard and delivering little.  Remember "all states should be purple?"  The vote farming continues.  "Are you Latino/Hispanic or non-Latino/Hispanic" is now firmly on medical forms, and my doctor says it does one thing only:  Gives more benefits to those who say that are Latino/Hispanic.  I declined to check those boxes and told the receptionist I thought we were supposed to have a colorblind society?  I can see "race," because it can affect medical decisions.  But not blatant vote farming. "Latino/Hispanic" is not a race.

Finally, from my link:

"And speaking of foreign lands, I've spent time abroad and speak Spanish and French and if Mr. Obama thinks the U.S. is a racist country, he ought to do a little bit of traveling not on Air Force One.  Try sitting at a French dinner table for twenty minutes and listening to the casual conversation if you think America is racist.

The truth is the USA is remarkably un-racist for a country its size.  We weren't always that way, obviously, but we walked the walk and we are now.  Or were.  The Democrat Party and its assorted media hacks are trying to take us backwards.  They suffer from nostalgia for racism for the glorious days when they could assert their moral superiority.  Sorry, those days are over.  The only way to stop remaining racism is to stop it, not talk about it, impute racism to people who don't have it and generally do everything possible to divide the American people from themselves.

And, Democrats, above all if you care about black people, stop it.  All you're doing is making their lives worse."

Critical Thinking?  Among Trumpkins?  HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!


Hell, even suggesting "Thinking" would make you a cuck.

Yeah!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 

Since slavery the majority of racists seems to have always resided with the left side of the aisle.
Why is a good question.
In my lifetime the left has always seemed to wrap their arms around whatever it takes to win with no consideration what-so-ever about the cost of winning, who gets hurt, or what will be left afterwards.
The end justifies the means is the standard of the American left and has been as long as I have been observant.
Using/playing the race/racist card always worked in the past for the left and they are basically naked without it, now, because so many people refuse to play their sick game, so the new strategy is to demonize those who observe their behavior to cut it off before too many people catch on that their emperor(s) is/are naked, stupid and racist.

Once again I can't find any mention of this from any reputable news outlet, including at least one with a very conservative bent.  Smells.  This is getting repetitive.

 What's getting repetitive is you trying to dismiss anything that is not favorable to Clinton.

Smells.

I didn't lie.  He got asked point blank about Duke and punted.  He only recanted later. Sorry, that really doesn't cut it in a Presidential election.  That's why Trump commands about 1% of the African american vote and about 23% of Hispanics.  And I don't want to get started on all the ways he's honked off women.  The guy is poison.  if you had any brains you'd be rooting full scale for Hillary.  If she wins there's a Conservative backlash and the GOP will probably replace her in four years.  If Trump wins you can kiss the GOP goodbye.  I can only imagine its status after 4 years of him on the bully pulpit.

Your ignorance is truly breathtaking.

And like your beloved democrats you were caught squarely in a lie, tried to back track it and then resorted to insults to cover for it.

This is not your classroom where you can spout out any lie you wish to your captive audience and not fear retribution.

I have some friends and cow-orkers that still claim that everything wrong today is STILL Bush's fault, and that Obama hasn't had enough time to undo all the bad that Bush did.

Ask them if they intended to 1) imply that Bush was so powerful that his influence continues today and 2) imply that Obama is so weak and impotent that he can't control the environment to the same extent that Bush did.