Entirely redundant. The old system worked fine to bottle up the news of Hunter Biden's laptop.

Isn't Hunter Biden now claiming gun control laws are unconstitutional?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/hunter-bidens-lawyer-gun-statute-unconstitutional-case-dismissed/story?id=103214828

I'm actually hoping Hunter Biden wins that.

  Senators serve 6 years.

To be on the safe side, no one over 30.

When a dictator arrest his political foes and outlaws opposition parties, it’s rather easy to get parliament to go along with him.

I think you're supposed to repeat your claims three times to make them come true.

Idalia has spent more time over hot water and now looks like it will come ashore above Cedar Key at 130 or a bit more.

Cedar key will be pretty much decimated if the storm does what it is looking like.

I volunteer on a river watch and we helped pull boats out of the water much of the day and evening, between storm bands and lots of people evacuated ahead of what’s coming.

A friend helped me and we got our steel storm shutters up early today and last night.  With the whole house generator we are feeling like we will be well situated to help the neighbors plug extensions in and run over to their refrigerators.

The worst will hit about 3-7 AM unless things change. Our power grid isn’t all that modern and will go pretty fast.

Luck favors the prepared, and sounds like you are, but good luck anyway!

I believe he has to be charged with violating a specific Federal law in Federal court:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
In other words he would first need to get his day in court to defend against that charge.

The first governor to push back against Fauci & Company was … Ron DeSantis. He saw something that Trump did not.

Kristi Noem gets no respect.

You can be a condescending jerk Jim, and I'm saying that nicely.  So if you support Trump, you're just an idol worshipping CULTIST? Thanks for painting me and others with an insultingly, broad brush.

And, oh, by the way, you're wrong wrong AGAIN.

Supporting Trump because he is the only candidate that meets your criteria is one thing, and lots of people fall into that, but then why personal attacks against any candidate not Trump because they are not Trump?  I can quote posts where the argument is that anyone not Trump is unworthy simply because they aren't Trump - and all other contenders are establishment tools.  I've posted info showing that Trump has accepted money from establishment types but that is brushed aside while with any other candidate doing the same is branded as a unipartyist.

I'm not saying you're a cultist, just that perhaps you and bunch of others here are now emotionally invested in one person and engage in selective rationalization, and I'm saying that nicely.

Sorry if I hold loopy ideas and insult others after I constantly get insulted for holding contrary ideas. But that's the great thing about an unmoderated forum.