This is called voter impersonation fraud. It is a slow, stupid way to attempt to steal an election. In fact, it's probably not useful for appreciably affecting any election. It is also easily detected, making it dangerous for the fraudster. This is why the number of cases of voter impersonation fraud tracked since 2000 is in the double digits nationwide, among over 1 billion votes cast. There is far more potential for fraud in other areas that voter ID will not affect.
The reason Democrats don't like voter ID is because the type of fraud it prevents is statistically non-existent and there is a perception that it will disenfranchise some number of voters who reliably vote Democrat. That perception is backed up by the fact that there is a certain portion of the population that has no photo ID at all. The GOP assertion that Democrats don't want it so we can fraudulently win elections is bullshit, since it's so difficult to fraudulently win elections by voter impersonation fraud.
So, again, if voter ID is so important to the right, maybe figure out how to articulate why it is needed, and come up with some proposals that would be a bi-partisan compromise.
Your fallacy, and that of democrats, is that if voter fraud isn't prosecuted and punished, it doesn't exist. But those videos point out that once the person leaves the voting booth after casting his ballot, he is 100% anonymous. What are they going to do, track down his false name or go to his false address?
But you want bipartisan? How about the 2005 recommendation for voter ID from the Federal Election Reform Commission, co-chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker?
"Critics of requiring voters to present a photo ID at the polls say the practice would disenfranchise minority voters, and some even accuse proponents of being motivated by racism. They don’t mention, however, that a 21-member bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter, advocated just such a policy in 2005.
"The commission, also co-chaired by former Secretary of State James Baker, called voter identification one of “five pillars” that would “build confidence” in the integrity of federal elections. Only three of the 21 commission members voted against requiring photo identification of voters."
https://www.carolinajournal.com/news-article/federal-election-reform-commission-advocated-voter-photo-id/So what's changed since then? Why was it right 11 years ago, and wrong today?