PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on January 23, 2024, 06:58:40 AM
-
As President Trump's momentum shuts out his opponents, Wall Street has begun to treat his candidacy as not just viable, but likely.
Once hailey flames out, the primary will be over. Even with the communist party begging NH dems to cross over and vote for her. President Trump remains comfortably ahead.
When he trounces her in SC he will have to drop out.
Despite concerns around Donald Trump’s controversial views and actions, his possible nomination as the Republican presidential candidate and potential victory in November has not deterred many Wall Street executives. In fact, some have even expressed support for him over the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden.
According to sources familiar with the matter, many on Wall Street had initially held onto the belief that Trump would not receive the nomination, causing them to enter a state of denial. However, with Trump’s growing momentum, these executives are now coming to terms with the likelihood that he may be victorious.
“It’s painful for me to admit this, but Wall Street is basically nonchalant to this election,” said Anthony Scaramucci, a former Trump communications director and long-time Wall Street executive.
Despite Trump’s controversial statements and policies, some Wall Street executives view him as being “benign to somewhat beneficial to the economy and business,” according to Scaramucci.
https://www.offthepress.com/wall-street-opposition-to-trump-collapses-as-pipe-dream-of-primary-defeat-ends/
-
"controversial views and actions"
"controversial statements and policies"
WHAT is controversial about Trump? Low taxes? Favoring the common people? Defend the frickin border? Don't stifle the economy by destroying our energy independence?
WTF is wrong with these idiots. All of the above is called "far right extremism" by the media and the Dems today, yet was normal and ordinary policy late last century even under Democrat administrations.
God these people are so delusional.
-
"controversial views and actions"
"controversial statements and policies"
WHAT is controversial about Trump? Low taxes? Favoring the common people? Defend the frickin border? Don't stifle the economy by destroying our energy independence?
WTF is wrong with these idiots. All of the above is called "far right extremism" by the media and the Dems today, yet was normal and ordinary policy late last century even under Democrat administrations.
God these people are so delusional.
It's just history repeating itself. Every regime that over throws a country uses the same tactics we are witnessing now, the only difference is the technology at hand.
Even Saul Alinsky noted it in his Rules for Radicals:
"Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
"Never go outside the expertise of your people."
"Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
"A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
"Keep the pressure on."
"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
"The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
"If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative."
"The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
-
I HATE liberalism.
It is a sickness, not a political ideology.
-
I HATE liberalism.
It is a sickness, not a political ideology.
By liberalism I take it you mean economic leftism which is simply evil people taking from productive people. That’s basically all it is. The rest is just embellishments.
Classic liberalism as opposed to monarchy is something else. But your average “liberal” today is basically a communist.
And you are correct, it is literally a sickness. These are people with personality disorders. You have to be mentally sick to have no problem with government sanctioned theft.
-
And you are correct, it is literally a sickness. These are people with personality disorders. You have to be mentally sick to have no problem with government sanctioned theft.
While I certainly understand the feeling, I don’t think it falls within the DSM criteria.
The thing which puzzles me most about these people is the depth of this belief that taxation does not involve the use of violence and threats of violence.
I have occasionally had long discussions and boiled the issue down to this with people and they are just in outright frank denial of the violence element. It is really weird to observe.
I guess that is the power of 12 years of indoctrination from a young age.