Thought I'd start one with a joke I read (and shamelessly ripping) from another forum

The Penguin Road Trip.. ..

A penguin is on a road-trip, driving across the USA. Somewhere in Arizona he notices that the car's oil-pressure light is on.

He gets out looking and sees oil dripping out of the motor, so drives slowly and carefully to the nearest town and stops at the first garage.

"I'll take a look," says the mechanic, "come back in an hour". So the penguin goes for a walk around town, feeling a little hot under the blazing sun. He soon sees an ice cream shop, and being a penguin in Arizona, decides that something cold would really hit the spot. He gets a big cone of vanilla ice cream and sits down under the shade of a tree to eat. But, having no opposable thumbs, he makes a real mess trying to eat the ice cream with his little flippers, and gets more of it around his mouth and down his chin than he manages to actually eat. After finishing his ice cream, he wanders back to the garage where he meets the mechanic, wiping his hands on an oily rag.

The mechanic looks over at the penguin and says, "It looks like you've blown a seal."

"Oh no, no, you're mistaken" the penguin replies, frantically wiping his mouth in embarrassment, "it's just ice cream."

I don't think the "no fly, no buy" idea is unconstitutional.  If there is a problem or a violation, it is with how we put people on the no-fly list to begin with, and with out we identify fliers as they board.  Perhaps we need a flyer's photo idea, but the libs would claim that is discriminatory.

I'm not sure how a no-fly list is constitutional to begin with, either. The idea that you can deprive someone of moving freely between the states without due process is frightening. Purchasing an airline ticket is a contractual obligation between the flyer and the airline. But now the government is stepping in and determining who can and cannot fly without actually accusing them of anything. It's all done under the guise of "safety and security". Not to mention it's a mystery how you end up on the list, who is on the list and how to get off the list if you're on it.

Actually, yes.  There are people in college safe spaces sitting around talking about white people (and race) all day.  Just like how there are people in Klan meetings sitting around talking about black people (and race) all day.

No we don't!

oops.

I mean, how do you know that?
 

The good methods for self defense are the ones that work.

Everyone, even liberal, agree in the right to self defense.  What they want to do is limit the amount of force you can apply during self defense, very likely to the point of placing you at a disadvantage.  It is morally deficient of them to do this - if ANYONE is harmed because their ability to defend themselves was limited, the fault is on the liberals for limiting the means of defense.  It is immoral to insist that someone else defend themselves at a disadvantage, potentially resulting in their death.

I would extend this to the anti-gun hysteria which causes people not to carry guns or which causes people not to be proficient with guns.

We do not have a gun problem.  We have a violent people problem because people believe that violent behavior is acceptable.  Switzerland has a gun ownership rate much higher than the US, but their murder rate with guns is less than 1/3 ours.  It's not about gun ownership.

Hillary's functions are so tightly controlled, it is hard to believe he got there, behind the stage in full view of the audience and cameras, without someone arranging it or at least knowing about it.