PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Bob Noel on July 06, 2016, 09:33:54 AM
-
the corrupt doormat publicly stated that she didn't send/receive classified emails.
the FBI has said that it has evidence that multiple emails did in fact have classified information in them (classified at the time of transmission/receipt)
So, did the corrupt doormat lie to investigators or was she truthful with the FBI during the investigation and only lie to the public?
-
the corrupt doormat publicly stated that she didn't send/receive classified emails.
the FBI has said that it has evidence that multiple emails did in fact have classified information in them (classified at the time of transmission/receipt)
So, did the corrupt doormat lie to investigators or was she truthful with the FBI during the investigation and only lie to the public?
Liberals never lie. Obviously you are involved in the vast right wing conspiracy.
-
the corrupt doormat publicly stated that she didn't send/receive classified emails.
the FBI has said that it has evidence that multiple emails did in fact have classified information in them (classified at the time of transmission/receipt)
So, did the corrupt doormat lie to investigators or was she truthful with the FBI during the investigation and only lie to the public?
That's a good question. Transcripts of her interview would be interesting to see, and juxtapose them with 18 USC 1001.
-
https://reason.com/reasontv/2016/07/05/hillary-clinton-vs-james-comey-email-sca
Did she lie? >:(
-
Yes, Comey directly said she lied. The media, therefore the general public does not care.
-
the corrupt doormat publicly stated that she didn't send/receive classified emails.
the FBI has said that it has evidence that multiple emails did in fact have classified information in them (classified at the time of transmission/receipt)
So, did the corrupt doormat lie to investigators or was she truthful with the FBI during the investigation and only lie to the public?
No, she didn't lie. She is a Democrat. She was just extremely careless with the truth.
If she were not a Clinton, or a democrat, it would have been a lie.
-
Yes, Comey directly said she lied. The media, therefore the general public does not care.
The question isn't, did she lie...it's did she lie to the FBI investigators?
-
The question isn't, did she lie...it's did she lie to the FBI investigators?
I think the real question is did she lie under oath?
-
I think the real question is did she lie under oath?
Do you think it's legal to lie to an investigator?
-
I think the real question is did she lie under oath?
Go read 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 and get back to us.
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 makes it a crime to: 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) make any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States. Your lie does not even have to be made directly to an employee of the national government as long as it is "within the jurisdiction" of the ever expanding federal bureaucracy. Though the falsehood must be "material" this requirement is met if the statement has the "natural tendency to influence or [is] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it is addressed." United States v. Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506, 510 (1995). (In other words, it is not necessary to show that your particular lie ever really influenced anyone.) Although you must know that your statement is false at the time you make it in order to be guilty of this crime, you do not have to know that lying to the government is a crime or even that the matter you are lying about is "within the jurisdiction" of a government agency. United States v. Yermian , 468 U.S. 63, 69 (1984). For example, if you lie to your employer on your time and attendance records and, unbeknownst to you, he submits your records, along with those of other employees, to the federal government pursuant to some regulatory duty, you could be criminally liable.
-
Do you think it's legal to lie to an investigator?
Did she intentionally lie to an investigator? What I recall was a hundred or so classified E-mails, among the tens of thousands that went in and out of her office in four years three years ago. Can she be excused for not recalling those 100? I think you'd have a hard time convincing a jury of open-minded people (unlike the crowd here) that forgetting about 100 instances in a pool of tens of thousands constitutes willful misdirection.
Obviously the FBI director thought so. According to you guys she should be indicted if she spits on the street. But not only did the FBI director not think there was enough to indict her on charges of mishandling classified material, he did not think there was enough to indict her for lying to the FBI, something he could have done. Recall, it is something you have to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
Did she intentionally lie to an investigator? What I recall was a hundred or so classified E-mails, among the tens of thousands that went in and out of her office in four years three years ago. Can she be excused for not recalling those 100? I think you'd have a hard time convincing a jury of open-minded people (unlike the crowd here) that forgetting about 100 instances in a pool of tens of thousands constitutes willful misdirection.
Obviously the FBI director thought so. According to you guys she should be indicted if she spits on the street. But not only did the FBI director not think there was enough to indict her on charges of mishandling classified material, he did not think there was enough to indict her for lying to the FBI, something he could have done. Recall, it is something you have to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
How about Scooter? Did he intentionally lie? He got sent up, and Patty Cankles got a photo op standing behind the Seal of the President of the United States.
BTW, FBI Director can't indict anyone.
-
I think the real question is did she lie under oath?
Doesn't matter. When speaking to the feds, you're always, effectively, under oath whether you swear one or not. See 18 USC 1001.
-
Do you think it's legal to lie to an investigator?
State: depends on the state. Feds, no, completely illegal.
-
Did she intentionally lie to an investigator? What I recall was a hundred or so classified E-mails, among the tens of thousands that went in and out of her office in four years three years ago. Can she be excused for not recalling those 100? I think you'd have a hard time convincing a jury of open-minded people (unlike the crowd here) that forgetting about 100 instances in a pool of tens of thousands constitutes willful misdirection.
Obviously the FBI director thought so. According to you guys she should be indicted if she spits on the street. But not only did the FBI director not think there was enough to indict her on charges of mishandling classified material, he did not think there was enough to indict her for lying to the FBI, something he could have done. Recall, it is something you have to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Do you ever get tired of shoveling excuses for the corrupt doormat?
Do you have any pride?
-
See where we are today? Her supporters just off-hand dismiss this whole affair and will look forward to pulling the handle for her come November.
Just imagine what she will feel free to do if elected.
-
Actually, now that I think about it the contents or her tete a tete with the FBI are likely under seal, meaning none of you even know what she said to them. Now, if you think giving a public interview is commensurate with testifying to the FBI I think lots of folks are going to be in trouble...
-
Actually, now that I think about it the contents or her tete a tete with the FBI are likely under seal, meaning none of you even know what she said to them. Now, if you think giving a public interview is commensurate with testifying to the FBI I think lots of folks are going to be in trouble...
No shit sherlock. Of course public comments aren't the same as being "interviewed" by the FBI. Are you just now figuring that out?
Hence my original question regarding whether this habitual liar also lied to investigators.
-
No shit sherlock. Of course public comments aren't the same as being "interviewed" by the FBI. Are you just now figuring that out?
Hence my original question regarding whether this habitual liar also lied to investigators.
Since the contents of the interview between the Hildebeast and the FBI have not been made public, I guess you don't know anymore than anyone else.
-
Did she intentionally lie to an investigator? What I recall was a hundred or so classified E-mails, among the tens of thousands that went in and out of her office in four years three years ago. Can she be excused for not recalling those 100? I think you'd have a hard time convincing a jury of open-minded people (unlike the crowd here) that forgetting about 100 instances in a pool of tens of thousands constitutes willful misdirection.
Obviously the FBI director thought so. According to you guys she should be indicted if she spits on the street. But not only did the FBI director not think there was enough to indict her on charges of mishandling classified material, he did not think there was enough to indict her for lying to the FBI, something he could have done. Recall, it is something you have to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Response in attachment
-
Since the contents of the interview between the Hildebeast and the FBI have not been made public, I guess you don't know anymore than anyone else.
wow... you figured that out all by yourself?
WTF do you think I asked the question in the original post?
-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/07/state-department-reopens-clinton-emails-probe.html
State Department reopens internal probe of Clinton emails
Kirby said earlier this week that former officials can still face "administrative sanctions." The most serious of those penalties is loss of security clearances, which could complicate Clinton's naming of a national security team if she becomes president.
-
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286849-fbi-didnt-record-clinton-interview-no-sworn-oath
-
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286849-fbi-didnt-record-clinton-interview-no-sworn-oath
yep - so we can't see what a lying squirming POS the corrupt doormat is. Unlike the video of bill clinton lying under oath.
-
Did the corrupt doormat lie to the FBI?
Does a bear do it's business in the woods?
Is the Pope Catholic?
A better question would be, 'Is there anyone the corrupt doormat didn't lie to, recently?'