Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on August 06, 2016, 09:23:03 PM
Excerpt:
'Journalists' clap and cheer for Clinton during 'press conference
Following her speech, Clinton participated in a Q&A with five pre-selected journalists.
The event's organizers and Clinton's campaign team maintain that the Q&A portion of the candidate's appearance at the journalism convention constituted a "press conference."
That means, then, that the Democratic presidential candidate held a "press conference" in a room filled with people who just moments earlier were cheering and applauding her vision for the White House.
NABJ President Sarah Glover said Friday that Clinton's appearance marked the "largest press conference with any presidential candidate before a room filled with journalists of color."
From the rest of the political press – silence. That this travesty of journalism could go unnoticed and unremarked upon by other reporters covering the event defies belief.
This is how freedom dies – with thunderous applause.
Post by: Anthony on August 06, 2016, 09:31:38 PM
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on August 07, 2016, 08:11:28 AM
http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/06/theres-good-reason-believe-clintons-health-far-worse-think/
Post by: Dav8or on August 07, 2016, 10:25:20 AM
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/journalists_clap_and_cheer_for_clinton_during_press_conference.html
Excerpt:
'Journalists' clap and cheer for Clinton during 'press conference
Following her speech, Clinton participated in a Q&A with five pre-selected journalists.
The event's organizers and Clinton's campaign team maintain that the Q&A portion of the candidate's appearance at the journalism convention constituted a "press conference."
That means, then, that the Democratic presidential candidate held a "press conference" in a room filled with people who just moments earlier were cheering and applauding her vision for the White House.
NABJ President Sarah Glover said Friday that Clinton's appearance marked the "largest press conference with any presidential candidate before a room filled with journalists of color."
From the rest of the political press – silence. That this travesty of journalism could go unnoticed and unremarked upon by other reporters covering the event defies belief.
This is how freedom dies – with thunderous applause.
You nailed it. This is what happens when an ideology controls the education system, the media, the news reporting and much of the judicial system. There has been a slow, but steady transformation of America since the early 20th century and it's picking up the pace now. The America as we have known it, will be gone in one, maybe two more generations. In the future, if they bother to hold elections at all, it will be a choice between left and further left.
People think that when the backwards thinking right wing is finally buried in the past and only correct, enlightened, educated thinking prevails, that life will be good for all. They know this because they can look to Europe and see all the sweet harmony and prosperity over there.
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on August 07, 2016, 10:39:36 AM
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on August 07, 2016, 10:40:18 AM
Post by: Steingar on August 08, 2016, 07:48:18 AM
Post by: Anthony on August 08, 2016, 08:26:31 AM
Clinton has held fewer press conferences than any other nominee. I suspect her administration will be the least transparent since Obama.
Obama's administration has been the most subversive, and secretive in history. They make Nixon look like Mother Teresa. Hillary was part of it, and responsible for a lot of the cover ups including the Benghazi video LIE. So I would agree that Hillary will continue Obama's lying and deceit.
Post by: nddons on August 08, 2016, 03:25:58 PM
Obama's administration has been the most subversive, and secretive in history. They make Nixon look like Mother Teresa. Hillary was part of it, and responsible for a lot of the cover ups including the Benghazi video LIE. So I would agree that Hillary will continue Obama's lying and deceit.(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160808/5252892f83c1061950e0bf3ac1a22a87.jpg)
Post by: Little Joe on August 09, 2016, 02:55:01 PM
Clinton has held fewer press conferences than any other nominee. I suspect her administration will be the least transparent since Nixon.Do you think Nixon's administration was less transparent than Obama's?
I don't, but I guess that is a subjective assessment.
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on August 09, 2016, 07:47:55 PM
Post by: Jaybird180 on August 11, 2016, 06:50:28 AM
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160808/5252892f83c1061950e0bf3ac1a22a87.jpg)
Childish to say "She's a bigger liar than me." A liar and cheat is a liar and cheat no matter how bold. Not a dig at you Stan, just the meme.
Post by: nddons on August 11, 2016, 07:03:03 AM
Childish to say "She's a bigger liar than me." A liar and cheat is a liar and cheat no matter how bold. Not a dig at you Stan, just the meme.Actually, no. It's bigger than that. It's a reflection of society's in general, and democrats' specifically, tolerance and acceptance of cheating, corruption, and lawlessness, as long as their goals are being met.
Show me a single democrat who is having a crisis of conscience about voting for Hillary.
Post by: asechrest on August 11, 2016, 07:43:42 AM
Actually, no. It's bigger than that. It's a reflection of society's in general, and democrats' specifically, tolerance and acceptance of cheating, corruption, and lawlessness, as long as their goals are being met.
Show me a single democrat who is having a crisis of conscience about voting for Hillary.
There are many.
Post by: Little Joe on August 11, 2016, 07:53:21 AM
Actually, no. It's bigger than that. It's a reflection of society's in general, and democrats' specifically, tolerance and acceptance of cheating, corruption, and lawlessness, as long as their goals are being met.My wife and my Mother In Law.
Show me a single democrat who is having a crisis of conscience about voting for Hillary.
Post by: nddons on August 11, 2016, 01:25:55 PM
Actually, no. It's bigger than that. It's a reflection of society's in general, and democrats' specifically, tolerance and acceptance of cheating, corruption, and lawlessness, as long as their goals are being met.
Show me a single democrat who is having a crisis of conscience about voting for Hillary.
There are many.
My wife and my Mother In Law.Ok, that tells me not to speak in absolutes with such a literal group of pilots.
Let me rephrase: Show me a prominent democrat or public group of democrats who are having a crisis of conscience in voting for Hillary. Are they making noises about it? Is the press highlighting the "splits" in the Democratic Party over such crisis?
Post by: Gary on August 11, 2016, 01:34:23 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/03/blue-collar-democrats-turn-against-hillary-clinton-over-radical-islam-loss-of-us-manufacturing-base/
Edit - Bernie did surprisingly well due to that distaste for Hillary. Just like there are Republicans that will vote for the Donald only because he is the Republican candidate, there are also Democrats that will vote for Hillary for the same reason.
Post by: Little Joe on August 11, 2016, 01:48:39 PM
Ok, that tells me not to speak in absolutes with such a literal group of pilots.You know that if we can't nail you on content, then we will get you on spelling, or grammar, or perhaps we will just reword your statement to prove it can be extrapolated to the nonsensical extreme.
Let me rephrase: Show me a prominent democrat or public group of democrats who are having a crisis of conscience in voting for Hillary. Are they making noises about it? Is the press highlighting the "splits" in the Democratic Party over such crisis?
I agree with you that the Democratic leadership is solidly and willingly behind Clinton. But many of the followers, who through ignorance or naievity usually blindly follow the Democrat talking points are starting to wise up to Hillary. Maybe not enough, but many.
Post by: bflynn on August 11, 2016, 01:54:24 PM
Google "Democrats Against Hillary". You will find quite a few.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/03/blue-collar-democrats-turn-against-hillary-clinton-over-radical-islam-loss-of-us-manufacturing-base/
Edit - Bernie did surprisingly well due to that distaste for Hillary. Just like there are Republicans that will vote for the Donald only because he is the Republican candidate, there are also Democrats that will vote for Hillary for the same reason.
What?! No, I've been watching the MSM and it's only Republicans that are turning on Trump. Are you telling me they're not being balanced? (/sarcasm)
Post by: Gary on August 11, 2016, 03:21:16 PM
What?! No, I've been watching the MSM and it's only Republicans that are turning on Trump. Are you telling me they're not being balanced? (/sarcasm)
;)I believe you are watching the wrong MSM.. Fair and Balanced is only found on Fox. ;)
Post by: Dav8or on August 11, 2016, 07:47:47 PM
There are many.
Agreed. Here in the Bay Area, there are a great many who are pissed about it. Most will likely suck it up and vote Clinton, but they are not going to do so in good conscience.
Post by: DJTorrente on August 12, 2016, 07:46:06 PM
Just like there are Republicans that will vote for the Donald only because he is the Republican candidate, there are also Democrats that will vote for Hillary for the same reason.
Count me among the conservatives who will vote for Donald because Hillary is the Democratic candidate.
Post by: nddons on August 12, 2016, 07:57:46 PM
You know that if we can't nail you on content, then we will get you on spelling, or grammar, or perhaps we will just reword your statement to prove it can be extrapolated to the nonsensical extreme.I know. What was I thinking?
I agree with you that the Democratic leadership is solidly and willingly behind Clinton. But many of the followers, who through ignorance or naievity usually blindly follow the Democrat talking points are starting to wise up to Hillary. Maybe not enough, but many.
Post by: asechrest on August 12, 2016, 08:03:44 PM
Post by: Little Joe on August 13, 2016, 06:52:15 AM
To follow on to my own post a bit:
I agree with you that the Democratic leadership is solidly and willingly behind Clinton. But many of the followers, who through ignorance or naievity usually blindly follow the Democrat talking points are starting to wise up to Hillary. Maybe not enough, but many.
The Democrat leadership is behind Clinton because that is how they intend to retain their own power. Their power is derived from making the population dependent on them and government.
The general democrat population however, generally thinks they are doing the right thing and being nice. In their naievity they think that giving people stuff will make them grateful and cause them to become productive. Some of these people are beginning to see through Hillary. But they still cling to their naive philosophy that human nature can be legislated and directed.
Post by: nddons on August 13, 2016, 07:03:51 AM
Hey, DJ. Long time no read.This^^^^^^
Post by: Gary on August 13, 2016, 01:18:01 PM
Count me among the conservatives who will vote for Donald because Hillary is the Democratic candidate.
No problem... personal choice. There will be a larger number of people voting for Hillary because she isn't the Donald. And yes, welcome back!
Post by: DJTorrente on August 14, 2016, 06:43:11 AM