PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: JeffDG on August 08, 2016, 11:09:47 AM
-
Donnie debates Donnie:
-
Oh my God, my head hurts.
Now what channel is the women's beach volleyball on again?
-
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160809/e0957456903370eada053a532730b348.jpg)
-
Trump campaign comes out with new sign design:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpdZIy0UMAA7wCY.jpg:large)
-
eventually it'll be: "I don't know what the heck he meant either...."
-
So, Hillary was having a bad media day today with the Orlando shooter's dad at her rally and all.
Problem is, Trump saw how much press she was getting, and instead of a sane candidate letting folks pick at her for a while, he's so narcissistic that he can't stand anyone else getting press coverage, so he goes out and inserts foot as into mouth, about up to the knee so that HE can be the centre of attention.
Let me say again: Thanks, Trumpkins.
-
So whats the odds that DJT will attend all 3 debates ?
I suspect he will do only the first one, then claim it was rigged and refuse to do the rest.
It was the same for the primaries debates, once it was down to 4 or so people, he said he was done, probably because he would be asked more difficult questions. When it was 17 on stage, maybe in 2 hours he was asked 4 or 5 soft ball questions.
-
So whats the odds that DJT will attend all 3 debates ?
I suspect he will do only the first one, then claim it was rigged and refuse to do the rest.
It was the same for the primaries debates, once it was down to 4 or so people, he said he was done, probably because he would be asked more difficult questions. When it was 17 on stage, maybe in 2 hours he was asked 4 or 5 soft ball questions.
Do you mean "softball questions" like "Why do you hate women"?
-
So whats the odds that DJT will attend all 3 debates ?
I suspect he will do only the first one, then claim it was rigged and refuse to do the rest.
It was the same for the primaries debates, once it was down to 4 or so people, he said he was done, probably because he would be asked more difficult questions. When it was 17 on stage, maybe in 2 hours he was asked 4 or 5 soft ball questions.
The one who stands to lose more in these debates is Hillary, not Trump. Trump is a wild card and will b very difficult for Hillary to prep against. Her only ammunition is to attempt to bait Trump by assaulting his ego, but Trump has much more ammunition on her considering her past.
All of these wet dreams of Trump quitting or dropping out of this and that are just that, wet dreams.
-
All of these wet dreams of Trump quitting or dropping out of this and that are just that, wet dreams.
If by "this" you mean the debates, rememberer you will be quoted on this in the future. I also believe he will not debate, or that her will not do all the debates. He has proven this already.
-
If by "this" you mean the debates, rememberer you will be quoted on this in the future. I also believe he will not debate, or that her will not do all the debates. He has proven this already.
How lame, and pathetic. "You will be quoted".........
Typical liberal threat to attempt to control the dialogue.
-
There will be only one debate because Hillary will either spazz-out under the stress and start a coughing fit 20 min "bathroom break" or will be so drugged up that she'll be a zombie .
-
There will be only one debate because Hillary will either spazz-out under the stress and start a coughing fit take a 20 min "bathroom break" or will be so drugged up that she'll be a zombie .
-
There will be only one debate because Hillary will either spazz-out under the stress
I'd put my bet on this.
-
How lame, and pathetic. "You will be quoted".........
Typical liberal threat to attempt to control the dialogue.
You don't think. You just type, don't you? Your responses just have to start with "typical" include "liberal" and some nonsense. It's simple formula and makes posting easy. I don't think post counts matter, do they?
-
You don't think. You just type, don't you? Your responses just have to start with "typical" include "liberal" and some nonsense. It's simple formula and makes posting easy. I don't think post counts matter, do they?
More liberal deflection. LOL. ;D
-
More typical liberal deflection. LOL. ;D
You forgot to include "typical" so I fixed it for ya.
-
You forgot to include "typical" so I fixed it for ya.
So you criticize me if I use a word you don't like, then you are upset if I write something and don't use that word?.
Really??
LOL ;D
-
I predict that a week or two before the election, the Dems will start running ads where Trump contradicts himself. Something like the opening clip except with better production values.
I am afraid that Trump is going to cost the GOP the Senate as well as the WH. That is going to give Hillary the opportunity to dramatically shift the SCOTUS in a liberal direction.
-
I predict that a week or two before the election, the Dems will start running ads where Trump contradicts himself. Something like the opening clip except with better production values.
I am afraid that Trump is going to cost the GOP the Senate as well as the WH. That is going to give Hillary the opportunity to dramatically shift the SCOTUS in a liberal direction.
Well, conservatives could prevent that by supporting, and voting for Trump.
-
Well, conservatives could prevent that by supporting, and voting for Trump.
They're busy destroying their party so they can blame the voters. Years of talking about inclusion and unity have turned out to be just lies like everything else.
-
Well, conservatives could prevent that by supporting, and voting for Trump.
They could also soften the effect by getting on board to confirm Merrick Garland, who by all accounts is a middle of the road, open-minded and qualified candidate to the Supreme Court. Judge Garland is likely to be far less liberal than anyone Hillary is likely to nominate. But, then again, the message I heard was "let the next President decide".
-
Well, conservatives could prevent that by supporting, and voting for Trump.
The problem with that is twofold. One is mathematical. There are not a majority of conservatives in the country. You need some of the moderate swing voters who are running from Trump. The second is that Trump isn't really a conservative. Given his predilection for changing his views to suit what he thinks will get him the biggest applause, it is impossible to guess what he would do in office.
Conservatives and the media outlets that cater to them have no one to blame but themselves. For decades they have clung to the belief that they are in the majority, or at least they have completely ignored the fact that they are not. When a minority takes the my-way-or-the-highway approach, they are going to be marginalized, sooner or later. That time has come with this election, I fear. The price will be a liberal SCOTUS that will limit our rights to effectively defend ourselves and will give government a blank check to expand ever further beyond the constraints that the founders intended to be in the Constitution.
-
They could also soften the effect by getting on board to confirm Merrick Garland, who by all accounts is a middle of the road, open-minded and qualified candidate to the Supreme Court. Judge Garland is likely to be far less liberal than anyone Hillary is likely to nominate. But, then again, the message I heard was "let the next President decide".
+1
I have been saying this all along as I have expected Trump to lose the general election. There was no need to make a formal announcement that the next President was going to have to decide. They should have said that Garland would be considered all in good time and then fiddled with hearings until there was some clarity on the presidential race. Then they could confirm if Hillary looked to win and block the appointment if it looks like the Republican would win.
-
The problem with that is twofold. One is mathematical. There are not a majority of conservatives in the country. You need some of the moderate swing voters who are running from Trump. The second is that Trump isn't really a conservative. Given his predilection for changing his views to suit what he thinks will get him the biggest applause, it is impossible to guess what he would do in office.
The flaw in your argument is that you assume that only conservatives will vote for Trump. But Trump will garner quite a few disenchanted, anti-Hillary Democrat votes. And if you listen to people on this board you should believe that as some here say that Trump is more liberal than Hillary. I don't think that is true, but he is more liberal than I prefer.
-
The flaw in your argument is that you assume that only conservatives will vote for Trump. But Trump will garner quite a few disenchanted, anti-Hillary Democrat votes. And if you listen to people on this board you should believe that as some here say that Trump is more liberal than Hillary. I don't think that is true, but he is more liberal than I prefer.
The leftist, anti-establishment vote will either suck it up and vote for Hillary or they will go Green Party. Some of the moderates who are pissed off will doubtless vote for Trump, but that number seems to be decreasing every day.
Of course, I was responding to the comment that if only the conservatives turned out to vote, Trump would win. In that context, may statement was correct as written.
-
Hahahahahahahahahahaha.....
Another deep thought? We will see if you are still cackling when Hillary sets a solid liberal majority on the court.
-
Another deep thought? We will see if you are still cackling when Hillary sets a solid liberal majority on the court.
Garland is about as moderate as Hilary Clinton is respectful of the law. Pretending otherwise is just academic masturbation.
-
Garland is about as moderate as Hilary Clinton is respectful of the law. Pretending otherwise is just academic masturbation.
Any masturbation going on here is anything but academic.
The only way Garland is to the left of moderate is if your world view is that anyone less conservative that far right whacko is a liberal.
-
I predict that a week or two before the election, the Dems will start running ads where Trump contradicts himself. Something like the opening clip except with better production values.
I am afraid that Trump is going to cost the GOP the Senate as well as the WH. That is going to give Hillary the opportunity to dramatically shift the SCOTUS in a liberal direction.
It's already started. https://youtu.be/6dtk1eX7UBE
-
It's already started. https://youtu.be/6dtk1eX7UBE
I don't know how anyone can have any belief in what Trump will do given his predilection for changing his views, sometimes in hours.
-
I saw a great post on facebook the other day comparing the many, many Hilary Clinton scandals next to Donald Trump saying mean things. The truth is that the media is proud to be lying through their teeth to get Hilary Clinton elected and destroying Trump by any means what-so-ever. The democrat ministry of propaganda has become as intellectually dishonest as the Clinton political handlers.
-
I don't know how anyone can have any belief in what Trump will do given his predilection for changing his views, sometimes in hours.
Nonsense, he is very consistent, going back decades. Google old interviews, read his books. Same guy. Now he plays the crowd, but at least he doesn't change his accent to "good old boy" when talking to southerners.
-
Nonsense, he is very consistent, going back decades. Google old interviews, read his books. Same guy. Now he plays the crowd, but at least he doesn't change his accent to "good old boy" when talking to southerners.
Drinking on Sundays. Nice!
-
Drinking on Sundays. Nice!
Lame, Stan, lame. What is untrue in my post? Are you getting all of your Trump info from PMSNBC/CNN/HuffPo? Have you watched the videos, read his books?
-
Lame, Stan, lame. What is untrue in my post? Are you getting all of your Trump info from PMSNBC/CNN/HuffPo? Have you watched the videos, read his books?
You mean the videos where he was totally pro-choice on abortion? Or the ones where he talked about how great immigrants were?
How about the fact that he refuses to hire locals and imports people from eastern Europe for his resorts?
-
Lame, Stan, lame. What is untrue in my post? Are you getting all of your Trump info from PMSNBC/CNN/HuffPo? Have you watched the videos, read his books?
Lame? You said that Trump is very consistent, going back decades. Really?
So when he told Tim Russert in 1999 (less than 2 decades) "I am very pro-choice in every respect" that would be consistent with how he feels today?
When he said in 2000 (less than 2 decades) in his book The America We Deserve": "I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." that would be consistent with how he feels today?
What's lame is lying to people like me who know things and follow politics that something is so when it clearly is not.
-
When he said in 2000 (less than 2 decades) in his book The America We Deserve": "I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun." that would be consistent with how he feels today?
Don't forget that after Newtown, when Obama called for more gun control, Trump said (http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-sandy-hook-shooting-obama-spoke-me-462131)"Obama spoke for me and every American."
-
Nonsense, he is very consistent, going back decades. Google old interviews, read his books. Same guy. Now he plays the crowd, but at least he doesn't change his accent to "good old boy" when talking to southerners.
Personality-wise he has been disturbingly consistent. It is the policies/positions he changes somewhat more often then he changes his undies.
-
(http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160816/61082ed95645377be300ceac739b3b2c.jpg)