PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Little Joe on August 14, 2016, 04:50:33 AM
-
Help me fill in the blanks here.
I'll start.
1. She is smarter. (but is it smart to elect "smart evil")? A large positive times a large negatives results in a VERY LARGE negative.
2. She has more government experience. (is that a + or a - )
Anything else? I'm not looking for a list of Trumps (many) negatives. I'm looking for a list of what people think is better about Hillary.
-
is she really smarter?
what proof do you have that she is smarter?
-
Oh Boy! This is a tough one! Never have we been faced with two more unappealing choices. Given that, I believe that this is a choice of which candidate is the least worst.
1.) Hillary does strike me as pretty intelligent. I will give her the nod in that she is better at the details and thinking through the consequences of decisions. Hillary isn't a wallflower, she can stand by her principals, even if they are wrong. So far she has run a good campaign, since her opponent is more than able and willing to shoot himself at every opportunity, it's smart of Hillary to just stand out of the way. Then again, the e-mail thing was just stupid, stupid, stupid, she should of known better and she has handled the aftermath horribly. Hillary is far less impulsive and far more thick skinned, however she has that degree of paranoia and secrecy that is troubling. She doesn't make enemies if she doesn't have to.
2.) Foreign policy. A clear nod to Hillary, I do believe she understands how international politics works. Negotiations/relations with powerful sovereign nations is very different from negotiations with a contractor for services. She has developed contacts and relationships across the globe, the Donald can't match that.
3.) Government experience. To get anything done in government requires cooperation from others who don't agree with you. That's the beauty of our system. I do believe Hillary will be better at it than the Donald. Many have said that President Obama was divisive, if the Donald is President, my fear is that it will be much worse.
4.) Tackling spending and the budget. Hillary is status quo, not much will happen, unfortunately. She will not reform entitlement spending to any great measure, if anything spending will probably increase. She isn't going to reduce taxation, nor will she reduce the size of government. At best, she might lower the yearly budget deficit, but I find that unlikely. I'm of the opinion that Presidents have little short term influence on the economy. Don't believe either can suddenly launch us into 5% year to year growth.
So, there you go... for what it's worth.
-
2.) Foreign policy. A clear nod to Hillary, I do believe she understands how international politics works. Negotiations/relations with powerful sovereign nations is very different from negotiations with a contractor for services. She has developed contacts and relationships across the globe, the Donald can't match that.
YGTBSM!
She was a disaster as Secretary of State. What accomplishments as Secretary are you basing this on?
3.) Government experience. To get anything done in government requires cooperation from others who don't agree with you. That's the beauty of our system. I do believe Hillary will be better at it than the Donald. Many have said that President Obama was divisive, if the Donald is President, my fear is that it will be much worse.
What government experience? A do nothing junior Senator with no accomplishments as well as a disaster Secretary of State?
Please point out where she got anything "done" in either of those positions, other than line her pockets with pay for play.
-
Ummm...ummmm....
Nope I can't come up with a single reason. Maybe because she spins the media better? She is better are weaseling out of things?
-
And she likely wouldn't be the candidate if she and DWS hadn't fixed the primary process.
-
...because she will be better at prison reform. Working from the inside.
-
7 posts and no one mentions her obviously critically important genitalia? Geez, you guys are slipping.
-
A loudmouth clown or a lying crook. Which will be less destructive to the country?
-
A loudmouth clown or a lying crook. Which will be less destructive to the country?
"Lying crook" doesn't have nearly enough adjectives to describe Hillary, or to project the amount of damage she will be able to do.
The Supreme Court will just be the start. She will suck the life out of our economy like all socialist governments have done. The only socialist countries that had any sort of healthy economy were those that relied on oil revenues, and Hillary is trying to eliminate that.