PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Lucifer on March 05, 2017, 06:24:03 AM
-
http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets – a video that was later posted on the Facebook page of Senate Democrats as “words of inspiration.”
-
I know people like Lynch, Holder, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Jarrett, and the rest of his Maoist administration, and now shadow government want anarchy, and violence. Lynch just has the b*lls to say it. Still, a disgusting show for anyone, especially a former AG, and chief LEO.
-
http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets/
I couldn't find where she described blood and death as a "need" but rather a possible hardship risk of marchers:
“It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.”
She should be forced to be specific about what rights she claims are being attacked. She subscribes to a political philosophy that suppresses individual rights and that is where she should be attacked. The blood and death aspect appears no different from that espoused by men generally considered real patriots and defenders of liberty and rights; e.g.:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson.
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry.
-
It is AMAZING how carefully progressives craft their words to give their shit head protesters a pass, while attacking everyone that dares to disagree. The media taught them to do it and their college asshole professors encouraged it.
-
I couldn't find where she described blood and death as a "need" but rather a possible hardship risk of marchers:
“It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.”
She should be forced to be specific about what rights she claims are being attacked. She subscribes to a political philosophy that suppresses individual rights and that is where she should be attacked. The blood and death aspect appears no different from that espoused by men generally considered real patriots and defenders of liberty and rights; e.g.:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson.
"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry.
I agree that lynch has not called for blood and death on the streets.
Of course, she repeated the BIG LIE (BS claims about rights being trampled, etc). But let's not compound that lie with lies about what she said (not directed at you Jim).
-
I agree that lynch has not called for blood and death on the streets.
Of course, she repeated the BIG LIE (BS claims about rights being trampled, etc). But let's not compound that lie with lies about what she said (not directed at you Jim).
Implicit in the Lynch speech is the notion that the marchers are peaceful and risk being victims of their inherently violent enemies. That is pretty much the reverse of what has been happening.
-
I think she probably doesn't recognize that it was people on the sidelines who did the killing and protesters who did the dying. My take away is that she would be just fine with that turned the other way around.
That is pretty much anti-King and anti-Civil Rights protesting.
-
Civil rights for all citizens is the LAST thing that progressives are interested in.
It is all about silencing those who dared to speak an objective word in opposition to their agenda.
-
I agree that lynch has not called for blood and death on the streets.
Of course, she repeated the BIG LIE (BS claims about rights being trampled, etc). But let's not compound that lie with lies about what she said (not directed at you Jim).
I don't think she was calling for blood, and death on the streets, but did, by the mention of it, subliminally plant the ideas of anarchy. No, I can not read her mind, heaven forbid. However, I do think that the people in which Obama surrounded himself, are ardent advocates of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radical", and tactics to create instability, chaos, and therefore even more opportunity for government to step in, and control.
-
Lynch update! :)
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-doj-records-relating-tarmac-meeting-attorney-general-loretta-lynch-former-president-bill-clinton-june-2016/
-
I'm sure it was just trading recipes.
-
I'm sure it was just trading recipes.
I suspect they were exchanging stories about their girlfriends.
-
I am glad these racists are out of office. They can join Oprah, Spike Lee, Samuel L. Jackson (communist that does Capital One credit card commercials), Amy Schummer, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Hillary, Bill, Chelsea, etc in the irrelevant room.