PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on July 25, 2017, 07:28:43 AM
-
For all those deniers and liars. the Presidential commission studying vote fraud has uncovered over 8,400 cases of double voting in just a few weeks.
Vote Fraud will be proven widespread and liberals will still lie about it, and call anyone who points this out a racist.
https://americanlookout.com/rms-busted-8400-cases-of-double-voting-already-discovered-in-21-states/ (https://americanlookout.com/rms-busted-8400-cases-of-double-voting-already-discovered-in-21-states/)
-
I think before we go anywhere with this, it's important to know the bias. We are guessing that all of the double voting will be 100% toward one party. However, I'm certain there will be a split of some kind showing preference for advancement of either party. It's critical to know this so that the votes can be identified to their source, and finally to the people responsible for certifying the vote totals for that state(s).
-
I think before we go anywhere with this, it's important to know the bias. We are guessing that all of the double voting will be 100% toward one party. However, I'm certain there will be a split of some kind showing preference for advancement of either party. It's critical to know this so that the votes can be identified to their source, and finally to the people responsible for certifying the vote totals for that state(s).
They will only find the votes that are identified to their source.
I assure you that if I wanted to, I could spend the entire election period voting multiple times a day and have practically zero chance of getting caught or identified. About the only way I could see it happening was if I went to same polling station twice and someone recognized me as having already been there. So, some kind of disguise change is in order. And I would never show up on the fraud commission's totals. I would never show up anywhere except in the "number voted" tally.
Good thing I'm not of a mind to do that.
-
But, voter fraud isn't real. Voter ID is unnecessary, and racist as it will stop minorities from voting.
-
All my life, I have been introduced to people and they told me their names, and I usually believed them. I never ever caught one in a lie.
But then again, I rarely asked for photo id, so I really don't know how many of them lied, do I?
If a young person voted for their parents, would that be caught? Or would that be another case of no fraud because they weren't caught?
-
Interesting news train here. The American Look Out link references an article in Brietbart which relies on a report done by the "non-partisan" Government Accountability Institute (GAI). GAI was founded by Peter Schweitzer and Stephen Bannon, with Rebekah Mercer as the chairwoman. There is a group of non-partisan, non-ideological, fair minded individuals if I ever saw one.
The GAI report presents no data, doesn't describe their methods in any detail, is fraught with speculation and is riddled with qualifiers and cautions. They had issues with getting the data, were "unable to conduct a comprehensive review" and recognize that the "quality of the data varied and was sometimes unreliable". Right up front they mention that they "sought to only identify two votes cast with the same legal name".
The report does not verify a single voter who illegally cast a vote.
The report does show some evidence into how messed up our voter registration process is.
Fake News! ;)
-
I have personally looked into my local county voter roles. I have found voter registrations where I could not google the address and where I, who live here, cannot find the house when I physically drove to it. I have seem many multiple more people registered using homeless shelters as an address than exist. I have seen valid registrations still on the books from years using a dorm room as an address and more people registered using a college address and in a valid status than attend one of the local colleges.
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that registration fraud occurs and that in NC, once it does, it is impossible to detect voter fraud.
-
Interesting news train here. The American Look Out link references an article in Brietbart which relies on a report done by the "non-partisan" Government Accountability Institute (GAI). GAI was founded by Peter Schweitzer and Stephen Bannon, with Rebekah Mercer as the chairwoman. There is a group of non-partisan, non-ideological, fair minded individuals if I ever saw one.
The GAI report presents no data, doesn't describe their methods in any detail, is fraught with speculation and is riddled with qualifiers and cautions. They had issues with getting the data, were "unable to conduct a comprehensive review" and recognize that the "quality of the data varied and was sometimes unreliable". Right up front they mention that they "sought to only identify two votes cast with the same legal name".
The report does not verify a single voter who illegally cast a vote.
The report does show some evidence into how messed up our voter registration process is.
Fake News! ;)
Well, can you imagine that? A "partisan"news source or think tank? It's a shame the liberals don't control one.
Oh wait!