PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on September 12, 2018, 10:42:50 AM
-
Another exceptional example of the deep state committing treason.
Former Secretary of State John Kerry disclosed that he has been conducting rogue diplomacy with top Iranian officials to salvage the landmark nuclear deal and push the Islamic Republic to negotiate its contested missile program, according to recent remarks.
Kerry, in an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt to promote his new book, said that he has met with Iranian Former Minister Javad Zarif—the former secretary's onetime negotiating partner—three or four times in recent months behind the Trump administration's back.
https://freebeacon.com/national-security/kerry-meeting-iran-salvage-nuke-deal-rogue-diplomacy/
-
Remember, the dems wanted to see General Flynn indicted under the Logan Act for speaking with the Russian Ambassador before the inauguration.
How does this not rise to the level of the Logan Act? Or is Kerry "being heroic" and protecting us from the President?
-
How does this not rise to the level of the Logan Act? Or is Kerry "being heroic" and protecting us from the President?
I swear this is what the liberals and the Democrats TRULY BELIEVE. It's JUST like the Catholic Inquisition where the Church truly believed they were saving people's souls by torturing them to death. The left has taken the position that they are Saviors against an evil right wing force now personified by Trump. Anything is justified to reverse anything Trump does, not because there's any evidence on their side, but because they are quite literally, as religious fanatics in their cause.
-
Democrat Party began to morph into a religious organization when they created and embraced the KKK.
When they embraced abortion as the salvation of their cause the religious fervor resembled a cult.
These days the party has been hijacked by a core of disturbed people who are wrapped in a cocoon of epic proportions that keeps reality out of their field of vision.
The democrat party is truly a mental crisis taking place right before our eyes.
The mass killings are the next logical step as the people in charge devolve deeper into their insanity.
-
Isn't it actually illegal for private citizens to engage in diplomacy?
-
Isn't it actually illegal for private citizens to engage in diplomacy?
Logan Act.
Apparently only applies to members of one party. :o
-
Kerry has been a traitor since Vietnam. However, he is part of the elite that will never be held accountable, just like the Clintons.
-
Isn't it actually illegal for private citizens to engage in diplomacy?
That only applies to conservatives.
-
Logan Act.
Apparently only applies to members of one party. :o
Doesn’t look like anyone has ever been brought to trial charged with violating the Logan Act.
I don’t see how the Act could survive if anyone was prosecuted since it seems to violate the first amendment.
-
Doesn’t look like anyone has ever been brought to trial charged with violating the Logan Act.
I don’t see how the Act could survive if anyone was prosecuted since it seems to violate the first amendment.
Does it? Does the first amendment apply to people overseas?
In a way its moot. Who in their right mind is going to conduct diplomacy with someone who doesn't have diplomatic cover? What can they possibly hope to accomplish? Kerry might be a big shot, but what good is any o that going to do if he doesn't have the backing of the President. If he does, what he's doing is conducting diplomacy along a back channel, something many leaders have actually done.
-
Does it? Does the first amendment apply to people overseas?
In a way its moot. Who in their right mind is going to conduct diplomacy with someone who doesn't have diplomatic cover? What can they possibly hope to accomplish? Kerry might be a big shot, but what good is any o that going to do if he doesn't have the backing of the President. If he does, what he's doing is conducting diplomacy along a back channel, something many leaders have actually done.
They why did all you liberals give Trump such a hard time when he was accused of the same thing (only to later find out it occurred after the election)?
-
Does it? Does the first amendment apply to people overseas?
In a way its moot. Who in their right mind is going to conduct diplomacy with someone who doesn't have diplomatic cover? What can they possibly hope to accomplish? Kerry might be a big shot, but what good is any o that going to do if he doesn't have the backing of the President. If he does, what he's doing is conducting diplomacy along a back channel, something many leaders have actually done.
Because he's telling them to just wait it out and Trump will be gone in a couple of years and the Democrats will give them a new pile of money.
-
They why did all you liberals give Trump such a hard time when he was accused of the same thing (only to later find out it occurred after the election)?
Because it coincided with a massive Russian effort to try and swing the election his way, sort of like how The Russians donated to the Clinton Foundation an subsequently got a Uranium mine. Same sort of reasoning. The only difference is their's way more evidence for the former than the latter.
-
Because it coincided with a massive Russian effort to try and swing the election his way, sort of like how The Russians donated to the Clinton Foundation an subsequently got a Uranium mine. Same sort of reasoning. The only difference is their's way more evidence for the former than the latter.
Care to cite that evidence? Sources?
I ask that because so far, Mueller has spent $17 million and hasn't produced anything.
Then we have this:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/richard-burr-no-hard-evidence-of-collusion-in-russia-investigation
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., said Wednesday the panel has found “no hard evidence of collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia, but left open the possibility that it still could as it investigates Russian interference in the 2016 election.
“I can say as it relates to the Senate Intelligence Committee investigation that we have no hard evidence of collusion. Now, we’re not over. That leaves the opportunity that we might find something that we don't have today,” he told Fox News.
Burr said he hopes the committee can complete its investigation before the end of the year, but it would take anywhere from three to six months to issue a final report on its findings.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-say-investigation-found-no-evidence-russia-trump-collusion-n855986
WASHINGTON — House Republicans investigating foreign interference in the 2016 election say they have found no evidence that Russians colluded with any members of the Trump campaign and dispute a key finding from the intelligence community that Russia had developed a preference for the Republican nominee during the election.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-investigation-latest-house-intelligence-committee-report-election-collusion-no-evidence-a8325761.html
The US Congress’ House intelligence committee has found “no evidence” of collusion between President Donald Trump and Russian officials in its final investigative report about whether Moscow interfered with the 2016 US election.
And had there been any evidence, ANY, you can rest assured the democrats would have leaked it.
But we now have hundreds of thousands of pages of evidence how one campaign did conspire with the Russians to sway the election. That campaign funneled money through a law firm to a company called Fusion GPS, who then hired a former British Intelligence Officer to collude with various Russian actors with ties to Putin. This agent, under direction of the 4th highest officer in the DOJ and with full knowledge of the FBI drafted a "dossier" with wild and unsubstantiated claims about the opposition candidate. Remember, this was done to sway an election, and the campaign behind it didn't declare the money in any of their filings, hence the money laundering through the law firm.
The DoJ/FBI proceeded to use this dossier to obtain FISA warrants by 1) Lying on the application about the authenticy of the document, and 2) using FBI agents leaking information to the press to make the dossier look authentic.
In the mean time we had an official of the BHO WH unmasking tapes of illegal wire taps into the opposition campaign. Keep in mind, this is all be done for what reason? That's right, to sway an US election.
Oh, and if you haven't figured it out, the actual Russian collusion goes straight to Hillary Clinton.
-
The Media, Democrats, and other far left KOOKS have been trying to make something of the false Russia narrative for almost two years now. They can't bear that Hillary LOST legitimately, and fairly even with Democrat voter fraud, and much more money than Trump spent. Watch what happens when Trump gets reelected. They are routing against our economy, and country so he doesn't. They are LOSING.
-
The Media, Democrats, and other far left KOOKS have been trying to make something of the false Russia narrative for almost two years now. They can't bear that Hillary LOST legitimately, and fairly even with Democrat voter fraud, and much more money than Trump spent. Watch what happens when Trump gets reelected. They are routing against our economy, and country so he doesn't. They are LOSING.
Just imagine 2016 had Felonious Von Pantsuits not rigged the primary to her favor.
Yet she rigged the primary, bankrupted the DNC and outspent Trump 3 to 1, and still couldn't win.
-
Care to cite that evidence? Sources?
I ask that because so far, Mueller has spent $17 million and hasn't produced anything.
Then we have this:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/richard-burr-no-hard-evidence-of-collusion-in-russia-investigation
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-say-investigation-found-no-evidence-russia-trump-collusion-n855986
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-investigation-latest-house-intelligence-committee-report-election-collusion-no-evidence-a8325761.html
And had there been any evidence, ANY, you can rest assured the democrats would have leaked it.
But we now have hundreds of thousands of pages of evidence how one campaign did conspire with the Russians to sway the election. That campaign funneled money through a law firm to a company called Fusion GPS, who then hired a former British Intelligence Officer to collude with various Russian actors with ties to Putin. This agent, under direction of the 4th highest officer in the DOJ and with full knowledge of the FBI drafted a "dossier" with wild and unsubstantiated claims about the opposition candidate. Remember, this was done to sway an election, and the campaign behind it didn't declare the money in any of their filings, hence the money laundering through the law firm.
The DoJ/FBI proceeded to use this dossier to obtain FISA warrants by 1) Lying on the application about the authenticy of the document, and 2) using FBI agents leaking information to the press to make the dossier look authentic.
In the mean time we had an official of the BHO WH unmasking tapes of illegal wire taps into the opposition campaign. Keep in mind, this is all be done for what reason? That's right, to sway an US election.
Oh, and if you haven't figured it out, the actual Russian collusion goes straight to Hillary Clinton.
I promise you that mickey does not have sufficient IQ to comprehend any of those sources.
Besides that, he doesn’t have permission to think about any of the actual proof, because that would upset the carefully crafted house of lies he tells.
-
So why isn't Kerry being investigated by the DoJ and or the FBI for his actions? What promises are he making on behalf of the US? Is there more to this? Who else is involved? Do we have a "shadow government" in operation?
Where is Sessions?
http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/14/pompeo-rips-john-kerry/
-
Where is Sessions?
(https://farm3.static.flickr.com/2038/2142398161_34908d359b_b.jpg)