PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on June 24, 2024, 09:49:32 AM
-
This study, though peer reviewed, and now public, which is another word for bullshit, was removed within 24 hours of release by Lancet notes that 74% of Covid deaths caused by the scam vaccine. The finding indicates that those deaths were either directly due to the scam vaccine, or significantly due.
I guess tony the fraud got something he doesn’t want people to know about besides $130 million in royalties for his lies about the shots.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/lancet-journal-study-finds-73-9-deaths-following/
-
Inaccurate summary. What the paper actually says is that 74% of deaths FOLLOWING VACCINATION (i.e. within a certain time frame, e.g. 2 weeks) were actually caused by the vaccine. NOT deaths officially attributed to COVID.
And though now peer-reviewed and in publication, the study has been harshly criticized by experts like Vincent Iannellihttps://vaxopedia.org/2024/06/23/that-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ (https://vaxopedia.org/2024/06/23/that-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/)
-
Dr. Iannelli is a pediatrician with his own website, Vaxopedia. He has his opinion, which is one of thousands. Nothing puts his opinion as definitive.
-
Dr. Iannelli is a pediatrician with his own website, Vaxopedia. He has his opinion, which is one of thousands. Nothing puts his opinion as definitive.
True, but he is not alone. Do you read French? There is also this.
https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html (https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html)
Again, whether this study eventually proves to have merit or not, it is about connecting post-vaccination deaths causally with the vaccine. Post-vaccination deaths are still exceedingly rare.
-
True, but he is not alone. Do you read French? There is also this.
https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html (https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html)
Again, whether this study eventually proves to have merit or not, it is about connecting post-vaccination deaths causally with the vaccine. Post-vaccination deaths are still exceedingly rare.
So much data has been corrupted by Big Pharma and people in government who have an agenda and narrative, it will take years, probably beyond our lifetimes to get to the truth.
-
True, but he is not alone. Do you read French? There is also this.
https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html (https://fr.news.yahoo.com/nouvelle-version-dune-%C3%A9tude-refus%C3%A9e-151711624.html)
Again, whether this study eventually proves to have merit or not, it is about connecting post-vaccination deaths causally with the vaccine. Post-vaccination deaths are still exceedingly rare.
Welcome back Azure! This place hasn't changed much, except that anyone with a liberal leaning has been run off. Now People like me and a couple of others are considered the resident liberals since we don't toe 100% of the party line. Hope you have thick enough skin to stick around. Steingar drops by occasionally though.
-
No one has been "run off" from here. This is an open forum with no moderation and anyone is welcome. There is zero censorship.
Please show us one post where someone has been told to leave, or even where someone was banned.
(and to be fair, the only content removed have been serial spammers)
-
No one has been "run off" from here. This is an open forum with no moderation and anyone is welcome. There is zero censorship.
Please show us one post where someone has been told to leave, or even where someone was banned.
(and to be fair, the only content removed have been serial spammers)
That's all true. But when you make some place so unpleasant that they leave, to me that constitutes running them off.
-
That's all true. But when you make some place so unpleasant that they leave, to me that constitutes running them off.
Because that's what you believe doesn't make it so. From my perspective the reason several leave is they simply can't support their positions and then deflect by using the butt hurt tactics. Steingar is the classic case of that and is the king of "drive by" postings.
The liberals here have a real difficult time of not being able to censor those they disagree (much as we are seeing in society). As has been said many times "I may disagree with what you are saying, but I will fight for your right to say it".
Free Speech is Freedom.
-
Because that's what you believe doesn't make it so. From my perspective the reason several leave is they simply can't support their positions and then deflect by using the butt hurt tactics. Steingar is the classic case of that and is the king of "drive by" postings.
The liberals here have a real difficult time of not being able to censor those they disagree (much as we are seeing in society). As has been said many times "I may disagree with what you are saying, but I will fight for your right to say it".
Free Speech is Freedom.
Then why do so many of you guys profess to not visit liberal sites? Afraid that you can't support your beliefs when you are outnumbered?
-
Then why do so many of you guys profess to not visit liberal sites? Afraid that you can't support your beliefs when you are outnumbered?
I've never made that statement. My daily reading list includes liberal sites.
-
I would be willing to turn over moderation of this site for 90 days to anyone liberal, and yes even Steingar. And I could accurately predict within 30 days the censorship would start as well as bans.
Liberals love authoritarian tactics. Their ideas are so great they must be mandated and enforced. ::)
-
That's all true. But when you make some place so unpleasant that they leave, to me that constitutes running them off.
You poor thing….
-
You poor thing….
Why? You haven't run me off yet.
I agree with you and the others about 90% of the time. But that just isn't enough, is it?
-
Then why do so many of you guys profess to not visit liberal sites? Afraid that you can't support your beliefs when you are outnumbered?
Because moderators scold and ban typically only anyone that leans right. I've never been banned anywhere except the Pilot's Place and while that was temporary, I had enough of that faggot's idiocy.
-
Because moderators scold and ban typically only anyone that leans right. I've never been banned anywhere except the Pilot's Place and while that was temporary, I had enough of that faggot's idiocy.
I was banned for a week from another board I won’t name you all are familiar with for posting a real life story of discrimination against white men in hiring.
-
Because moderators scold and ban typically only anyone that leans right. I've never been banned anywhere except the Pilot's Place and while that was temporary, I had enough of that faggot's idiocy.
I only remember one person being temporarily banned from TPP. And he came back and is still embarrassing himself.
-
This site has several well informed, very intelligent, and I dare say probably very attractive contributors. What is not well tolerated is an opinion that cannot be defended. On the Right, but more often on the Left, a statement is made and many times is countered with facts and well-reasoned arguments. Sometimes strongly worded, and rarely with some implication of the breeding habits of the poster, but never with a demand that such an opinion is not welcome here. Weaker posters tend to leave. Stronger posters defend their position. I welcome contrary positions and I'm very willing to change my opinions if there's a good reason to do so.
This is very unlike the more leftist boards. There you're met with personal attacks and bans and censorship. Rarely with a counter-argument. I do visit those sites, but quickly become disgusted by the mental health of the general population there.