PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on October 22, 2024, 07:19:54 PM
-
https://x.com/DC_Draino/status/1848900660181291161
-
Well if you’re not gonna be a Democrat and still want to get elected to anything. I’d say welcome aboard except I’m not a Republican. I’d vote for her though over any Democrat. I’m glad Trump is tapping her. Politically I mean…
-
If she's pro 2A, including AR's and other semi auto rifles and pistols, I'm all in. Politically and otherwise.
-
If she's pro 2A, including AR's and other semi auto rifles and pistols, I'm all in. Politically and otherwise.
She needs to prove she can be trusted on that issue. That’s the one remaining doubt I have about her but right now I give her the benefit of the doubt. As a gamble, she’s less risky than voting for any lefty. In fact I trust her more than RFKJr on that issue.
That Trump is assembling this team including RFKJr proves he (Trump) is a populist and not really a conservative. And it’s a good thing, if not perfect. Anything to appeal to the bulk of people who are not far left or far right, so we can maximize support and hence ability to win elections.
RFKJr is great on two issues: Health (vaxes and poisonous food supply i.e. HFCS) and keeping us out of war just like his uncle. On 2nd A or socialist leaning economics, particularly the environment, he’s not so great, him saying he believes in “a capitalist solution” to climate change notwithstanding- I heard him say it! Trump needs to keep him in a limited playpen.
By “capitalist solution” he means government subsidies to private industry to develop environmentally friendly technology, but it was exactly that which got us into the terrible pickle we are in with high fructose corn syrup: subsidies to corn farmers.
It’s just too much to expect everyone, or even anyone, in Trump’s administration to have read Thomas Sowell’s “Basic Economics”.
-
I’m glad Trump is tapping her. Politically I mean…
Un huh, sure…😏😎
-
RFKJr is great on two issues: Health (vaxes and poisonous food supply i.e. HFCS) and keeping us out of war just like his uncle. On 2nd A or socialist leaning economics, particularly the environment, he’s not so great, him saying he believes in “a capitalist solution” to climate change notwithstanding- I heard him say it! Trump needs to keep him in a limited playpen.
If RFK Jr still believes the debunked Andrew Wakefield theory about MMR vaccine causing autism, then he's not great, he's intellectually dishonest. As HHS secretary, he would be a disaster - a fount of medical misinformation speaking with the authority of high office.
My impression of RFK Jr is that he's slightly unhinged. No thanks.
Not sure about Tulsi Gabbard.
-
A leftist talking point against anyone who they disagree with is using the word "unhinged". It falls right in with "racist" and "Fascist".
I give RFK, Jr the benefit of the doubt. Big Pharma has corrupted the medical decision making to a point that the bureaucrats in the medical fields simply can't be trusted any longer.
As far as HHS secretary? Xavier Becerra is an embarrassment and a joke. Maybe it's time to put someone in that isn't bought and paid for by Big Pharma and Big Medical.
-
If RFK Jr still believes the debunked Andrew Wakefield theory about MMR vaccine causing autism, then he's not great, he's intellectually dishonest. As HHS secretary, he would be a disaster - a fount of medical misinformation speaking with the authority of high office.
My impression of RFK Jr is that he's slightly unhinged. No thanks.
Not sure about Tulsi Gabbard.
I don’t agree with RFKJr on all his health opinions although he is on the right track with respect to childhood vaccines if not for the right reasons. The autism connection actually has not been debunked. It’s impossible to debunk it because there is no ethical way to do a proper scientific study. (i.e. Prospective double blind)
Whether or not they cause autism might not even be the biggest issue. The effects of overloading the immune system with unnatural versions of pathogens could be having deleterious effects, especially when compared to the robust immune systems developed by natural exposure to real diseases. Examples: I’m okay with the polio vaccine (killed version only!) but giving kids a flu shot every year? Insanity! Only benefits Big Pharma.
He recently posted on X that he will direct municipalities to stop putting fluoride in the water supply. Dentists disagree and he got backlash on X. But the truth is that the benefits of fluoridated water have not been proven to be better than simply locally applied fluoride using toothpaste, or applications by the dentist. You can also use dose controlled drops. Too much fluoride can cause discoloration of the permanent teeth and you should NOT use fluoridated tap water to mix infant formula for this reason!
But whether fluoride causes cancer and all the other stuff he claimed, I don’t really buy. My position is that I should have a choice, not be forced to consume fluoridated water so it probably shouldn’t be in tap water.
Iodine in salt however is another matter, and should be there; iodine deficiency was a serious problem until we put it in salt. Folate in cereal well yes, it helps prevent birth defects but we shouldn’t be consuming that much cereal with the synthetic version of folic acid (folate). We should get folic acid by eating liver, eggs and dark green veggies but no, we eat far too much starchy grains pushed by the federal government’s deplorable food pyramid which is the number 1 enabler of the t2 diabetes epidemic. So you see, the government mandating folate fortified cereal was a solution to a government caused problem in the first place.
-
A leftist talking point against anyone who they disagree with is using the word "unhinged". It falls right in with "racist" and "Fascist".
I give RFK, Jr the benefit of the doubt. Big Pharma has corrupted the medical decision making to a point that the bureaucrats in the medical fields simply can't be trusted any longer.
As far as HHS secretary? Xavier Becerra is an embarrassment and a joke. Maybe it's time to put someone in that isn't bought and paid for by Big Pharma and Big Medical.
He is better than nothing. Somebody needs to reign in government meddling in our health and Big Pharma corruption. My opinion is I’m glad Trump is tapping him but Trump needs to keep him in a limited playpen; not allow him free rein to do everything without some kind of objective investigation. Many of these issues are far from clear or “settled” science.
Childhood vaccines for example. We’ve really painted ourselves into a corner. There is no way at all to do a proper study to determine if there are unacceptable broad negative side effects because taking away the short term benefit of not getting acutely sick would be seen as unconscionable. Especially in a randomized study. Some kids get the real vaccine and some don’t, oh the public would really go for that.
-
I don’t agree with RFKJr on all his health opinions although he is on the right track with respect to childhood vaccines if not for the right reasons. The autism connection actually has not been debunked. It’s impossible to debunk it because there is no ethical way to do a proper scientific study. (i.e. Prospective double blind)
You are correct - I should have worded my statement more carefully. The sense in which it has been debunked is that the Wakefield paper was retracted because it was shown to be based on fraudulent research. As far as I'm aware there is simply no credible evidence that the MMR vaccine increases the risk of autism, so one should not be advocating against it on that basis (not sure if RFK Jr still does that, but he did at one time and he hasn't abandoned that stance, as far as I know). Given the contagiousness of the measles virus and the vaccine's high efficacy, I think mandating MMR for children unless medically contraindicated is good public health policy - even though it's an attenuated (but still live) measles virus that they're getting.
You didn't mention the mRNA vaccines against COVID - although I agree that these should not have been mandatory (mainly because they were, and remain, experimental), there is widespread misinformation about them that RFK Jr has repeated and helped to spread. There are legitimate health concerns surrounding these vaccines, including a rare (but perhaps not extremely rare) and mysterious Long Covid-like syndrome that has never been adequately explained (is the research still ongoing?), and of course the long term risks are completely unknown at this point. But they haven't been killing millions of people in the short term, and most of the recognized adverse reactions (like myocarditis) are quite rare and largely restricted to certain populations - myocarditis from vaccination is primarily a concern for young males. They remain a reasonable option for older adults and the immunocompromised and are certainly lower risk than contracting the virus itself.
-
A leftist talking point against anyone who they disagree with is using the word "unhinged".
He claims to have a "worm" in his brain. If that isn't (at least slightly) unhinged, I don't know what is.
-
He claims to have a "worm" in his brain. If that isn't (at least slightly) unhinged, I don't know what is.
Interesting.... He did say that he had a parasite that ate a bit of his brain and then died. This, he said, caused some cognitive issues. But this is all self-reported by RFK.Jr. I can't find independent confirmation. This is possible, but without official records it's hard to know the truth. But now the thought of parasitic brain eating worms is now my biggest nightmare. Right up there with FKH as president.
-
You are correct - I should have worded my statement more carefully. The sense in which it has been debunked is that the Wakefield paper was retracted because it was shown to be based on fraudulent research. As far as I'm aware there is simply no credible evidence that the MMR vaccine increases the risk of autism, so one should not be advocating against it on that basis (not sure if RFK Jr still does that, but he did at one time and he hasn't abandoned that stance, as far as I know). Given the contagiousness of the measles virus and the vaccine's high efficacy, I think mandating MMR for children unless medically contraindicated is good public health policy - even though it's an attenuated (but still live) measles virus that they're getting.
You didn't mention the mRNA vaccines against COVID - although I agree that these should not have been mandatory (mainly because they were, and remain, experimental), there is widespread misinformation about them that RFK Jr has repeated and helped to spread. There are legitimate health concerns surrounding these vaccines, including a rare (but perhaps not extremely rare) and mysterious Long Covid-like syndrome that has never been adequately explained (is the research still ongoing?), and of course the long term risks are completely unknown at this point. But they haven't been killing millions of people in the short term, and most of the recognized adverse reactions (like myocarditis) are quite rare and largely restricted to certain populations - myocarditis from vaccination is primarily a concern for young males. They remain a reasonable option for older adults and the immunocompromised and are certainly lower risk than contracting the virus itself.
If I recall yes, he still thinks that.
The Covid vax is a whole other subject. In any case shouldn’t be forced on us all. My body my choice. ;D
-
Interesting.... He did say that he had a parasite that ate a bit of his brain and then died. This, he said, caused some cognitive issues. But this is all self-reported by RFK.Jr. I can't find independent confirmation. This is possible, but without official records it's hard to know the truth. But now the thought of parasitic brain eating worms is now my biggest nightmare. Right up there with FKH as president.
I don’t know how you’d confirm it other than seeing his protected health info. I have no reason to doubt the story. Had, past tense. It’s not alive in there anymore.
-
He claims to have a "worm" in his brain. If that isn't (at least slightly) unhinged, I don't know what is.
So you had access to his medical history? Or can you point to a source that has?
-
So you had access to his medical history? Or can you point to a source that has?
No, of course not. Nor do I doubt that he did indeed suffer from this truly terrible infestation. I was just noting that it's all self-reported with no independent source of information. And that's OK.
-
No, of course not. Nor do I doubt that he did indeed suffer from this truly terrible infestation. I was just noting that it's all self-reported with no independent source of information. And that's OK.
I was quoting azure. ;)
-
I don't know whether it is true or not, but to reveal that information (if it's true) shows a pretty astonishing lack of judgment, in my opinion. But ok - whether it's true or not, I couldn't support him for any kind of official position, at least not without considerable further vetting.
If it's made up, then he's either a liar or truly unhinged, and more than just slightly.
If it's true, and there were cognitive effects from it, then Trump should require that he undergo cognitive testing before nominating him for any position. That claim should move him to the back of the queue for now - in any case, Trump shouldn't be publicly promising him a position.
-
He claims to have a "worm" in his brain. If that isn't (at least slightly) unhinged, I don't know what is.
Having a parasite in the brain is not medically possible?
-
Having a parasite in the brain is not medically possible?
It's unlikely - I never said impossible. See my reply to Lucifer above.
-
He claims to have a "worm" in his brain. If that isn't (at least slightly) unhinged, I don't know what is.
I’d say you could start looking at how your posts carefully weave leftist talking points in and try to avoid serious examination of them.
-
It's unlikely - I never said impossible. See my reply to Lucifer above.
Why would you say it’s unlikely? He traveled extensively in Africa, South America and Asia, where parasitic infections are far more common than in the U.S. There are several types that can end up in the brain but the most likely one was a pork tapeworm. His doctors probably couldn’t confirm which parasite it was without surgically removing it and if it seemed the “worm” (technically a larva encased in a cyst) had died then the risk of attempted removal might outweigh just leaving it in place. Probably the immune system walls it off. I dunno I’m not a doctor.
He did have cognitive symptoms for a while but they resolved. After the thing was no longer active it seems the brain healed itself. There’s no more reason to subject him to cognitive testing than there is for anyone else applying for a position of responsibility. He’s definitely sharper than Biden and Biden is the most powerful person on the planet right now. I mean as a puppet anyway. And people seem fine not testing him.
-
It's unlikely - I never said impossible. See my reply to Lucifer above.
A few moments of web searching yields this article, which hopefully clears this side issue up (ha ha - one can hope!):
Brain worms are more common than you think. Here’s what doctors who’ve treated them say. (https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/08/brain-worm-rfk-jr-parasitic-infection-not-uncommon/)
-
A few moments of web searching yields this article, which hopefully clears this side issue up (ha ha - one can hope!):
Brain worms are more common than you think. Here’s what doctors who’ve treated them say. (https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/08/brain-worm-rfk-jr-parasitic-infection-not-uncommon/)
Well there ya go. I wasn’t too far off.
-
A few moments of web searching yields this article, which hopefully clears this side issue up (ha ha - one can hope!):
Brain worms are more common than you think. Here’s what doctors who’ve treated them say. (https://www.statnews.com/2024/05/08/brain-worm-rfk-jr-parasitic-infection-not-uncommon/)
Interesting - lots there I didn't know, thanks.
But given his medical history, I still think cognitive testing would be a reasonable thing to ask for. Think of it this way: what do you think FAA would make him do if he applied for a 3rd class medical? This is a position that demands long hours and has lots of responsibility attached.
Full disclosure: everything I've read about this man convinces me he would be a TERRIBLE choice for HHS secretary even if he's 100% compos mentis. Yes, we need someone who will clean up the corruption at the health agencies. We don't need the additional baggage of someone who wants to upend public health policy based on skimpy or fraudulent research. Why does he want to remove fluoride from drinking water, again? Based on what evidence?
I hope Trump picks someone else, or the Senate rejects his nomination.
-
Yea, let's just keep using bureaucrats to decide health policy that is heavily influenced by big pharma.
BTW, there are lots of medical professionals who had their careers lost or smeared by these bureaucrats for not towing the narrative.
Remember Anthony Fauci?
-
Interesting - lots there I didn't know, thanks.
But given his medical history, I still think cognitive testing would be a reasonable thing to ask for. Think of it this way: what do you think FAA would make him do if he applied for a 3rd class medical? This is a position that demands long hours and has lots of responsibility attached.
Full disclosure: everything I've read about this man convinces me he would be a TERRIBLE choice for HHS secretary even if he's 100% compos mentis. Yes, we need someone who will clean up the corruption at the health agencies. We don't need the additional baggage of someone who wants to upend public health policy based on skimpy or fraudulent research. Why does he want to remove fluoride from drinking water, again? Based on what evidence?
I hope Trump picks someone else, or the Senate rejects his nomination.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dental_fluorosis
Public water fluoridation is responsible for 40% of fluorosis cases and 23% of American teens have it. You can get all the benefits of flouride to strengthen your teeth with DOSE CONTROLLED flouridation under the care of your dentist. What Bobby Jr. says about flouride causing all kinds of other problems I have no idea but this alone is enough for me to favor removing it from tap water.
Many well-known sources of fluoride may contribute to overexposure including dentifrice/fluoridated mouthrinse (which young children may swallow), excessive ingestion of fluoride toothpaste, bottled waters which are not tested for their fluoride content, inappropriate use of fluoride supplements, ingestion of foods especially imported from other countries, and public water fluoridation.[20] The last of these sources is directly or indirectly responsible for 40% of all fluorosis, but the resulting effect due to water fluoridation is largely and typically aesthetic.[20][21] Severe cases can be caused by exposure to water that is naturally fluoridated to levels above the recommended levels, or by exposure to other fluoride sources such as brick tea or pollution from high fluoride coal.[22]
Dental fluorosis has been growing in the United States concurrent with fluoridation of municipal water supplies, although disproportionately by race.[23] A 2010 CDC report acknowledges an overall incidence of dental fluorosis of 22% from 1986-87 increased to 41% in the early 21st century, with an increase in moderate to severe dental fluorosis from 1% to 4%.[24] The 2011-12 NHANES figures documented another 31% overall increase among American teens since the previous decade, with a total adolescent population impact of 61% afflicted. More than one in five American teens (23%) have moderate to severe dental fluorosis on at least two teeth.[25]
-
The issue of fluorosis caused by fluoride in drinking water, as I understand it, is a trade-off between a slight discoloration of the teeth and susceptibility to tooth decay, which can cause people to lose all their teeth by middle age or before. My parents grew up before public water was fluoridated - by the time I was born they were already wearing dentures and lost all of their teeth before I was 20. The Wikipedia article on it is consistent with what I've read elsewhere. It's certainly cause for concern for people using higher concentrations of sodium fluoride in toothpaste - I use two kinds, on the recommendation of my dentist, for remineralization of the enamel, so I should learn more about this - but drinking water concentrations are low enough that the fluorosis from that source is considered mild. I have a fair amount of mild discoloration on my teeth that I suspect is from fluorosis, but nothing like the pictures in that article of moderate and severe cases.
I just don't see any good reason to *remove* fluoride from drinking water - it would make more sense to investigate where else people are getting fluoride from, and to adjust the fluoride added to public drinking water based on how much naturally-occurring fluoride it already contains (I would be astonished if this isn't already done, but I'm not certain).
-
Why does he want to remove fluoride from drinking water, again? Based on what evidence?
It does sound like a dubious paranoia straight out of Dr. Strangelove. I had not heard he had an issue with fluoridation. So I looked up his complaints about fluoridation: it could cause cancer and it could negatively affect neurological development in children. Then compare to its single claimed benefit: reduction in dental caries.
When it comes to our health the libertarian position is that risk/benefit choice should be made at the individual level, not the collective level. Fluoridation of public water sources is a collective choice, ergo not libertarian. So on that basis alone his position would be sound because the risk is not zero. And it turns out that drinking fluoridated water no longer offers as much protection as it used to because of the development of fluoride in toothpaste , which delivers the fluoride directly to the areas of concern rather than needlessly throughout the body.
Of course not all water sources are fluoridated - for example, I grew up in a house supplied by its own water well (well inside St. Paul. MN city limits - my parents may have had a well dug rather than hook to city water because we lived next to a road spur that was never completed by the city so may not have been an option at any price.)
Anyway, a search of the net suggests to me at least that the cancer concern is debatable while the concern over neurological impairment is on a sounder basis. Who do you think should decide if the risks are worth the benefits?
These are the sources I found and used while composing the above claims:
Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261729/)
US government report says fluoride at twice the recommended limit is linked to lower IQ in kids (https://apnews.com/article/fluoride-water-brain-neurology-iq-0a671d2de3b386947e2bd5a661f437a5)
Fluoride and IQ (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fluoride-and-iq/)
Developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: an updated review (https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-019-0551-x)
Water Fluoridation and Cancer Risk (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk.html)
Controversy: The evolving science of fluoride: when new evidence doesn’t conform with existing beliefs (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-020-0973-8)
-
So why wasn’t this fruit loop given any kind of cognitive testing? He believes he is something he isn’t, and yet he was put in a position of public health.
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.goredforwomen.org%2F-%2Fmedia%2FImages%2FNews%2F2021%2FJune-2021%2F0625RachelLevine_SC.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b8d8d13a28590d596f4f9206f2ae19bc1758d9be3d8a7fda20f56bf9d401d8e7&ipo=images)
-
Yea, let's just keep using bureaucrats to decide health policy that is heavily influenced by big pharma.
BTW, there are lots of medical professionals who had their careers lost or smeared by these bureaucrats for not towing the narrative.
Remember Anthony Fauci?
Fauci the fraud was their god.
-
That fruitcake (mentally and literally) is a perfect example of leftism and why we must reject their every narrative.
-
So why wasn’t this fruit loop given any kind of cognitive testing? He believes he is something he isn’t, and yet he was put in a position of public health.
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.goredforwomen.org%2F-%2Fmedia%2FImages%2FNews%2F2021%2FJune-2021%2F0625RachelLevine_SC.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=b8d8d13a28590d596f4f9206f2ae19bc1758d9be3d8a7fda20f56bf9d401d8e7&ipo=images)
Nailed it!
-
It does sound like a dubious paranoia straight out of Dr. Strangelove. I had not heard he had an issue with fluoridation. So I looked up his complaints about fluoridation: it could cause cancer and it could negatively affect neurological development in children. Then compare to its single claimed benefit: reduction in dental caries.
When it comes to our health the libertarian position is that risk/benefit choice should be made at the individual level, not the collective level. Fluoridation of public water sources is a collective choice, ergo not libertarian. So on that basis alone his position would be sound because the risk is not zero. And it turns out that drinking fluoridated water no longer offers as much protection as it used to because of the development of fluoride in toothpaste , which delivers the fluoride directly to the areas of concern rather than needlessly throughout the body.
Of course not all water sources are fluoridated - for example, I grew up in a house supplied by its own water well (well inside St. Paul. MN city limits - my parents may have had a well dug rather than hook to city water because we lived next to a road spur that was never completed by the city so may not have been an option at any price.)
Anyway, a search of the net suggests to me at least that the cancer concern is debatable while the concern over neurological impairment is on a sounder basis. Who do you think should decide if the risks are worth the benefits?
These are the sources I found and used while composing the above claims:
Toxicity of fluoride: critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7261729/)
US government report says fluoride at twice the recommended limit is linked to lower IQ in kids (https://apnews.com/article/fluoride-water-brain-neurology-iq-0a671d2de3b386947e2bd5a661f437a5)
Fluoride and IQ (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fluoride-and-iq/)
Developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: an updated review (https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-019-0551-x)
Water Fluoridation and Cancer Risk (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk.html)
Controversy: The evolving science of fluoride: when new evidence doesn’t conform with existing beliefs (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-020-0973-8)
Thanks - that last article puts things in the proper perspective, I think. When researchers claim that the community is refusing to accept a new discovery because of preconceived ideas or undue bias, I'm always suspicious - to me, that makes the claim "extraordinary", requiring "extraordinary evidence". I agree with commenter Berezov: I'd expect the association between fluoride and low IQ to not be sex-specific, occurring only in males but not females. That's not to say it's impossible, but that fact requires an explanation, as well as independent confirmation that it is, indeed, a real association and not an artifact of methodology.
At this point we have *some* research indicating possible adverse health effects. I agree in general with the libertarian position on choice - this seems like something that can be addressed through recommended supplements, fluoridation of salt (as in some European countries), or even just the use of certain toothpastes that have the optimum amount, but leaving the ultimate decision to the consumer (i.e., the parents). It isn't like vaccination against serious infectious diseases like polio and measles, where the public health interest (in this case, herd immunity) is compelling. But withdrawing it should come only after ample discussions on the subject throughout the community. Doing this by fiat will only create the impression of rogue bureaucrats exercising their power in a quixotic way, tilting at windmills. The public health community will certainly not accept this without stronger evidence of harm that outweighs the benefit - we do not, unfortunately, live in a society run according to libertarian principles.
If the Trump administration wants to initiate a discussion about this via a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking or the like, that would make sense. (I'm not sure how the responsible agency operates - in fact, since fluoridation is handled on the local municipality level, I'm not sure what Federal agency would issue the rule.) I see this issue is an ongoing controversy - almost a culture war issue. That makes it too toxic an issue to handle by fiat. Those opposed to fluoridation are going to have to come up with better arguments, or Trump and RFK Jr are going to ignite a small but very intense firestorm if they go through with this.
-
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/11/trump_wins_and_all_of_a_sudden_yemen_s_houthis_decide_to_bow_out_from_making_war_on_the_u_s_navy.html
November 6, 2024
All of a sudden, Yemen's Houthis decide to bow out from making war on the U.S. Navy
By Monica Showalter
What a difference an election makes.
With President Trump's mighty victory in last night's election, Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels, who have been literally at war with the U.S. Navy in the Red Sea region, all of a sudden would like to be peaceable and play nice.
-
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/11/trump_wins_and_all_of_a_sudden_yemen_s_houthis_decide_to_bow_out_from_making_war_on_the_u_s_navy.html
Remember…” Elections Have Consequences…”?
-