PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Little Joe on February 22, 2025, 11:33:40 AM

Title: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Little Joe on February 22, 2025, 11:33:40 AM
You can't make this shit up (unless you are a Democrat).

Quote
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, is facing backlash for introducing a budget recommendation that changes the word "mother" to "inseminated person," and "paternity" to "parentage" in certain parts of state law.
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Bamaflyer on February 22, 2025, 11:56:39 AM
I read that. Just crazy as shit.
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Username on February 22, 2025, 11:57:23 AM
Isn't a gay receiver also an inseminated person?  (ew)
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Anthony on February 22, 2025, 12:18:13 PM
The shit has got to STOP.
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Rush on February 22, 2025, 12:26:52 PM
Isn't a gay receiver also an inseminated person?  (ew)

Looking up the definition of insemination (DON'T go to the Wikipedia page!) unless we're talking about sowing crops, it's "introduction of semen into the female reproductive tract for the purpose of pregnancy."  It does not say the pregnancy has to have been achieved. But it does seem to require the recipient to be female. It could be by natural intercourse or artificial means.

But from the strict parsing of the word: "...from Latin insēminātus, past participle of insēmināre “to implant, impregnate,” equivalent to in- “in” + sēminātus (equivalent to sēminā(re) “to sow,” derivative of sēmen “seed” + -tus past participle suffix)", it simply means to throw out seed, which could apply to a male receiver.
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: You Only Live Twice on February 22, 2025, 03:00:29 PM
Looking up the definition of insemination (DON'T go to the Wikipedia page!) unless we're talking about sowing crops, it's "introduction of semen into the female reproductive tract for the purpose of pregnancy."  It does not say the pregnancy has to have been achieved. But it does seem to require the recipient to be female. It could be by natural intercourse or artificial means.

But from the strict parsing of the word: "...from Latin insēminātus, past participle of insēmināre “to implant, impregnate,” equivalent to in- “in” + sēminātus (equivalent to sēminā(re) “to sow,” derivative of sēmen “seed” + -tus past participle suffix)", it simply means to throw out seed, which could apply to a male receiver.

What's a female? What's a male?
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Little Joe on February 22, 2025, 03:04:43 PM
Looking up the definition of insemination (DON'T go to the Wikipedia page!) unless we're talking about sowing crops, it's "introduction of semen into the female reproductive tract for the purpose of pregnancy."  It does not say the pregnancy has to have been achieved. But it does seem to require the recipient to be female. It could be by natural intercourse or artificial means.

But from the strict parsing of the word: "...from Latin insēminātus, past participle of insēmināre “to implant, impregnate,” equivalent to in- “in” + sēminātus (equivalent to sēminā(re) “to sow,” derivative of sēmen “seed” + -tus past participle suffix)", it simply means to throw out seed, which could apply to a male receiver.
Oh you poor thing.  So out of touch.

Don't you know that all it takes to be a female, is to WANT to be a female?
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Jim Logajan on February 22, 2025, 03:13:58 PM
Oh you poor thing.  So out of touch.

Don't you know that all it takes to be a female, is to WANT to be a female?
Is it OK to want to be a lumberjack?
Title: Re: Inseminated Person?
Post by: Anthony on February 22, 2025, 04:55:49 PM
Is it OK to want to be a lumberjack?

Or to eat Spam???