PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: texasag93 on April 16, 2025, 11:20:50 AM
-
https://x.com/i/trending/1912553133223338436 (https://x.com/i/trending/1912553133223338436)
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that under the Equality Act 2010, the terms 'woman' and 'sex' refer to biological sex, not gender identity. This decision, arising from a case between the Scottish government and For Women Scotland, ensures that women-only spaces and services, such as sports teams, bathrooms, and shelters, are reserved for biological females. The ruling has been celebrated by advocates for women's rights as it reinforces the protection of spaces based on biological sex. However, it has also raised concerns regarding transgender rights, with critics expressing fears over diminished protections for transgender individuals. The court emphasized that while the Act prioritizes biological sex in certain contexts, protections against discrimination for transgender people remain intact.
-
A little surprising coming from the UK, but at least they made the proper ruling.
-
Most people understand reality but have been too scared to say so. I see a trend of some finding their stones and speaking truth kind of like the kid who said the emperor has no clothes. I hope the trend continues. I don't know if it mattered but the election of Donald Trump seems to have reminded the U.S. and possibly the world, that this woke nonsense is a minority cult, not the majority opinion but you wouldn't know it from the near total media support of the gender lunacy.
-
minority or majority, the woke nonsense is nonsense
-
Some mentally defective guy cosplaying as a woman, is not a woman. No matter how many parts he cuts off. If someone wants to do that, fine. Just don't involve me in the fantasy. Women's sports is not a retirement plan for mediocre male athletes.
And finally there seems to be a critical mass against this pronoun nonsense.
-
Good for them for protecting women’s spaces. Now do men. Bring back Gentlemen’s clubs. Make Boy Scouts only for boys again.
-
Just had my tires rotated. Basked in all the testosterone there, and had a great conversation with the young man who brought my car around for pickup. Also with the young man who checked me in. I love men. Thank God for them.
-
Just had my tires rotated. Basked in all the testosterone there, and had a great conversation with the young man who brought my car around for pickup. Also with the young man who checked me in. I love men. Thank God for them.
This week a young man came to spray posion all around the house to save me from those giant cockroaches that like to come inside. I can't imagine a job driving around to people's houses all day, wearing a uniform with little embroidered spiders on it, and dealing with hysterical housewives over bugs. Much respect!
-
This week a young man came to spray posion all around the house to save me from those giant cockroaches that like to come inside. I can't imagine a job driving around to people's houses all day, wearing a uniform with little embroidered spiders on it, and dealing with hysterical housewives over bugs. Much respect!
Think about how the guy would feel if he had to deal with hysterical husbands... :-/
-
Think about how the guy would feel if he had to deal with hysterical husbands... :-/
Oxymoron in my experience. They remain steel nerved and cool. I suppose mileage may vary.
-
Oxymoron in my experience. They remain steel nerved and cool. I suppose mileage may vary.
not in a blue state, eh?
Think about all those weenies in blue states that are petrified of scary black guns.
-
not in a blue state, eh?
If I'm not mistaken, Becky is in one of the bluest of blue states.
-
Yep, Washington. We are ruled by Seattle. Our idiot Governor waltzed out after 12 years of extravagant failed policies, leaving us in a deficit of around $12 billion. I hear he has retired to Idaho. The deficit, of course, remains, but the Dem-controlled legislature will “fix” it with a host of horrific new and invasive taxes upon we peons. Our Republican state reps are constantly sending out emails saying “We tried.”
It’s my belief, though, that Washington has been cheated blue.
-
I hear he has retired to Idaho.
There was a rumor that he had bought land in Hayden, but he (and others) denies it. I don't know why he would. He has to know that he's not welcome here.
It’s my belief, though, that Washington has been cheated blue.
I don't think there has been an honest election in Washington since Gregoire stole the election from Rossi.
-
True. And Gregoire was cheated in over Rossi twice, remember? That’s when we first encountered the Dems just continuing to count and recount until they got the result they wanted. Up to that time in my life “recount” was more or less theoretical. You rarely saw one.
-
True. And Gregoire was cheated in over Rossi twice, remember? That’s when we first encountered the Dems just continuing to count and recount until they got the result they wanted. Up to that time in my life “recount” was more or less theoretical. You rarely saw one.
kind of reminds me of the line used by a guy dealing a poker hand: "hey, misdeal, someone got my hand"
-
Just had my tires rotated. Basked in all the testosterone there, and had a great conversation with the young man who brought my car around for pickup. Also with the young man who checked me in. I love men. Thank God for them.
Speaking of basking in testosterone, we’re adding on to the house and there have been gangs of men around for months now. Out of all the dozens, or maybe a hundred or more, different guys who have been here: roofers, framers, concrete guys, electricians, plumbers, drywallers, painters, gutter guys, internet guys, insulation guys, carpenters, dump truck drivers, flatbed truck drivers, excavation/grading guys, guys just delivering materials, the alpha guy in charge of it all, and one poor guy who just cleans up after everybody else. Out of all these workers only ONE is female. One of the painters. That’s it!
-
Oxymoron in my experience. They remain steel nerved and cool. I suppose mileage may vary.
Generally true. There are exceptions, of course.
-
Dylan Mulvaney just can't catch a break.
On a related note, Dylan Mulvaney went to go hide out in Peru, because he feels so much safer there, only to have Peru declare LGBTQ+ people as mentally ill. Hahahaha!
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that under the Equality Act 2010, the terms 'woman' and 'sex' refer to biological sex, not gender identity.
-
Dylan Mulvaney just can't catch a break.
The sad thing is, I had no problem with Dylan Mulvaney, until Bud Lite hired her. Or him I guess. I never had any problem with effeminate men, cross dressers, or trans as long as they were sane and stayed in their lane. But trying to force LGBTQ ETC. onto the mainstream culture is too much. They wrecked an iconic Joe Sixpack brand (Budweiser). And now they're actively hostile to ordinary people, as if WE are the crazy ones. Like thinking only biological women should play in women's sports.
-
The sad thing is, I had no problem with Dylan Mulvaney, until Bud Lite hired her. Or him I guess. I never had any problem with effeminate men, cross dressers, or trans as long as they were sane and stayed in their lane. But trying to force LGBTQ ETC. onto the mainstream culture is too much. They wrecked an iconic Joe Sixpack brand (Budweiser). And now they're actively hostile to ordinary people, as if WE are the crazy ones. Like thinking only biological women should play in women's sports.
Exactly. In addition, the Trans people, and some of the other gender fluid, Gay, or Lesbian want to FORCE their views, and ideals on YOU.
You must not only comply, but actively promote, and cheerlead for their cause, or be deemed a NAZI.
Well who, or what are the real Nazis now? >:(
-
I've never known a woman who acts like Dylan. At any age. If he wants to prance around and pretend he's a 10 year old girl and camp it up, fine. But don't insist on us celebrating this as a transition. He's pretending and is an attention whore.
If someone truly believes in their soul that they were "born into the wrong body" then great. Modify your body however you want. Please don't involve me in the process. I really don't care.
-
I've never known a woman who acts like Dylan. At any age. If he wants to prance around and pretend he's a 10 year old girl and camp it up, fine. But don't insist on us celebrating this as a transition. He's pretending and is an attention whore.
If someone truly believes in their soul that they were "born into the wrong body" then great. Modify your body however you want. Please don't involve me in the process. I really don't care.
The whole point of transitioning is to end up stealth... passing so well few people suspect you're trans and that's how you want it. You specifically DON'T want attention drawn to yourself. The real trans I've known in the past were like that. They did not prance around acting like an exaggerated charicature of the opposite sex, but tried to blend in naturally with it.
People like Dylan are attention whores like you said, they are using the fact that trans has been forced into the spotlight to profit for themselves. I have no problem with that, if I find you entertaining, fair enough, but don't use it to ruin brands, force yourself into spaces that aren't appropriate (such as children's spaces!) or attack straight people or for that matter, regular "stealth" trans and LGB people, for not embracing elevating trans as some kind of special superior entitled being. That's a cult.
-
Speaking of basking in testosterone, we’re adding on to the house and there have been gangs of men around for months now. Out of all the dozens, or maybe a hundred or more, different guys who have been here: roofers, framers, concrete guys, electricians, plumbers, drywallers, painters, gutter guys, internet guys, insulation guys, carpenters, dump truck drivers, flatbed truck drivers, excavation/grading guys, guys just delivering materials, the alpha guy in charge of it all, and one poor guy who just cleans up after everybody else. Out of all these workers only ONE is female. One of the painters. That’s it!
Every so often, I come across a YouTube video put out by Campus Reform, Turning Point, or some such interviewing young female skulls-full-of-mush and they are asked: "Does the world need men?"
The answer is always "No, not really."
Uh-huh. Tell me: where does your food come from? "I bought it at the store with my own money."
Where do you get money? Who gave you that job? Who started that company? Who built the building?
Where does your food come from? Who started that store? Who built that store? Who grew the crops? Who picked, harvested, packaged and delivered?
You like wearing clothes? Where did they come from?
What about your car? Your iPhone? Who invented, designed, engineered, manufactured, distributed, transported and sold it? What about the gas you put in your car? Who provided that?
Literally everything that we use and consume in our lives, everything that makes us more comfortable and safer, that make life better, that make it worth living, was brought to us by men, including make-up, bras, and tampons.
The patriarchy doesn't put anyone down. The patriarchy lifts everyone up.
-
The Media, Entertainment Industry, and DEMOCRATS have demonized Men to the point that younger Women think they need to "Destroy the Patriarchy" as some of my young, female friends like to tell me.
Disney is the largest offender. They are Demonic in every way.
-
Every so often, I come across a YouTube video put out by Campus Reform, Turning Point, or some such interviewing young female skulls-full-of-mush and they are asked: "Does the world need men?"
The answer is always "No, not really."
Uh-huh. Tell me: where does your food come from? "I bought it at the store with my own money."
Where do you get money? Who gave you that job? Who started that company? Who built the building?
Where does your food come from? Who started that store? Who built that store? Who grew the crops? Who picked, harvested, packaged and delivered?
You like wearing clothes? Where did they come from?
What about your car? Your iPhone? Who invented, designed, engineered, manufactured, distributed, transported and sold it? What about the gas you put in your car? Who provided that?
Literally everything that we use and consume in our lives, everything that makes us more comfortable and safer, that make life better, that make it worth living, was brought to us by men, including make-up, bras, and tampons.
The patriarchy doesn't put anyone down. The patriarchy lifts everyone up.
I was right with you up to the part about make up and bras. Makeup sucks and is bad for you, as its chemicals sink through your skin into your bloodstream. I haven’t used it for years. Plus, who decided women didn’t look perfectly fine without all that crap? I’m guessing men. So they invented makeup. And women use it to attract men. I was blessed to attract a man who didn’t care for seeing chemical crap smeared around a woman’s face and eyes.
As for bras, they suck too. I avoid wearing a bra whenever possible. They never ever fit right, they hitch up and down, the straps flop no matter how much you adjust them, and they compress and cut into you in places that need to be moving freely, like your armpit. I’ve never burned a bra in a public demonstration but can understand completely why someone might do it.
Same for pantyhose. Hard to get them put on, hot, never fit quite right, stupid. Who decided a bare leg was a crime? Men. Same with high heels. Dangerous, uncomfortable, extremely bad for your feet with them squeezed into the toe while your heel is up in the stratosphere. Men designed these! Because they make women walk seductively with their hips swaying, but that’s just because they are trying to stay upright on the stupid heels.
But other than that, I totally agree and love men, and vastly and daily and even hourly appreciate all they have brought me, and speak against man bashing wherever I encounter it.
-
Can't remember the last time my wife wore panty hose. She wears very little makeup, a little blush on her cheeks now and then and really doesn't need as she is beautiful without it. She would net be caught dead outside the house without a bra.
-
Every so often, I come across a YouTube video put out by Campus Reform, Turning Point, or some such interviewing young female skulls-full-of-mush and they are asked: "Does the world need men?"
The answer is always "No, not really."
Uh-huh. Tell me: where does your food come from? "I bought it at the store with my own money."
Where do you get money? Who gave you that job? Who started that company? Who built the building?
Where does your food come from? Who started that store? Who built that store? Who grew the crops? Who picked, harvested, packaged and delivered?
You like wearing clothes? Where did they come from?
What about your car? Your iPhone? Who invented, designed, engineered, manufactured, distributed, transported and sold it? What about the gas you put in your car? Who provided that?
Literally everything that we use and consume in our lives, everything that makes us more comfortable and safer, that make life better, that make it worth living, was brought to us by men, including make-up, bras, and tampons.
The patriarchy doesn't put anyone down. The patriarchy lifts everyone up.
“The patriarchy” is a myth. (Excepting certain societies like hard core Muslim.)
The reality is men never oppressed women. Biology did, if you consider “oppression” not having to do the hard manual labor and intellectual heavy lifting necessary to build and maintain civilization.
Mother nature tasked women with bearing and raising children. Before The Pill this was a constant job. No sooner had you weaned one off the breast (breastfeeding is natural birth control) you got pregnant again. Ideally a woman is always either pregnant or nursing throughout her fertile years as well as supervising all the previous children.
It’s up to men to keep her and the brood alive. The woman has no time or energy to build a shelter, obtain all the food, and fight off raiders. You could make an argument that it is the men who are oppressed. Nature fills him with an instinct to protect what is likely his genetic offspring, and his mate. Since humans are pack animals, we form communities that enforce this instinct through rules and social mores. Once locked into supporting a family, a man is made to suffer economically and socially if he abandons them.
Oh she couldn’t vote? For most of history neither could the common man. He had little to no input into who ruled him. The truth is not that there was a patriarchy where all men oppressed all women. It was an elite class oppressing the rest, men and women. If anything males had it worse. They were the first killed in a war or raid, they died doing the dangerous work of bringing in resources, they were not the focus of default protection as women and children always have been, which is correct evolutionarily, or your species will go extinct. Men are useful if expendable fodder for the continual existence of the species as a whole. Women are not expendable because they are the vehicle needed for a minimum of three years per child just to physically build and nourish the next generation to the point the kid could survive without her. Men’s role in creating that kid lasts about a minute. ;D
Since reliable birth control and the rise of feminism, this biological order has been wrecked, leading to such nonsense as “women don’t need men”. Because of technological progress women can live just fine on their own because we have houses and cars and grocery stores and an economic system whereby they can afford these things by entering the workforce.
But it is still men who do 95% of the work underlying all of these things, except it’s no longer directly visible much of the time, leading to the delusion that men aren’t necessary.
EDIT: Note about three years to wean a child. Yes, in nature we are supposed to breastfeed until the kid is a toddler. It’s not biologically normal to wean earlier. People these days think it’s “sick” to see a walking talking two or three year old at mommy’s breast but there are good reasons we evolved to nurse that long. The truth is that the formula companies played a large role in discouraging breastfeeding and getting us to where we are today on the subject.
-
I like make up, and fishnet stockings. What say you?
;D
-
I have no idea who first invented makeup, but I suspect it was mostly women. At least in the beginning. Women found out early in our evolution that in order to attract the big, strong, masculine men, they needed to out compete all the other women so they did what they needed to to win the man that would support and protect them. That included make-up and provocative clothing. But regardless of who invented makeup or bras, it was definitely men that saw the profit in it and took it to new levels.
And it was men that invented the pill that allowed women to avoid the cycle of pregnancy and it was men that invented things like washing machines and vacuum cleaners that helped women find the time to pursue other things, like education and careers.
And now men are inventing AIs and Robots to further fuck the natural order of the world up.
-
I was right with you up to the part about make up and bras. Makeup sucks and is bad for you, as its chemicals sink through your skin into your bloodstream. I haven’t used it for years. Plus, who decided women didn’t look perfectly fine without all that crap? I’m guessing men. So they invented makeup. And women use it to attract men. I was blessed to attract a man who didn’t care for seeing chemical crap smeared around a woman’s face and eyes.
As for bras, they suck too. I avoid wearing a bra whenever possible. They never ever fit right, they hitch up and down, the straps flop no matter how much you adjust them, and they compress and cut into you in places that need to be moving freely, like your armpit. I’ve never burned a bra in a public demonstration but can understand completely why someone might do it.
Same for pantyhose. Hard to get them put on, hot, never fit quite right, stupid. Who decided a bare leg was a crime? Men. Same with high heels. Dangerous, uncomfortable, extremely bad for your feet with them squeezed into the toe while your heel is up in the stratosphere. Men designed these! Because they make women walk seductively with their hips swaying, but that’s just because they are trying to stay upright on the stupid heels.
But other than that, I totally agree and love men, and vastly and daily and even hourly appreciate all they have brought me, and speak against man bashing wherever I encounter it.
I was never into all the female accessories for the most part. I could dress up when needed, minimal makeup, pantyhose (which I always hated) and somewhat high-ish heels. But I was almost 5’11” and self-conscious about it so never wore tall heels. I was good looking enough that I didn’t need to go to all that work to attract men. Makeup and fashion bored the hell out of me. Never could get interested in it. It was too mundane. My head was always off in the stars somewhere.
I HATE bras. Despise them with a white hot passion. It’s impossible to get one that fits right. But I have to wear them if I go out of the house or anybody other than my husband is going to see me. I do have a thing about appearing like I’m flopping all over the place in public or nips showing.
I don’t really have an opinion about whether women do makeup and all this for themselves or because they think it’s what men want. It’s probably because girls develop a pack mentality in adolescence and must go along with what “everybody else” is doing. I didn’t seem to succumb to that as much when I was young.
-
I like make up, and fishnet stockings. What say you?
;D
I do have fishnet that I never wear. Except once in a blue moon for about a minute.
-
I do have fishnet that I never wear. Except once in a blue moon for about a minute.
I Think we all know why they only stay on for about a minute! ;)
-
In the old West and even Victorian times, women with big breasts were preferred because it meant at the time that they could feed children and insure that they would grow up to help with the farms.
In other cultures women with big bottoms were a status symbol for men because having enough food to go around to allow your wife to develop a large butt was a sign of wealth.
Different strokes for different folks..
-
In the old West and even Victorian times, women with big breasts were preferred because it meant at the time that they could feed children and insure that they would grow up to help with the farms.
In other cultures women with big bottoms were a status symbol for men because having enough food to go around to allow your wife to develop a large butt was a sign of wealth.
Different strokes for different folks..
True, that big breasts signal to men the woman’s ability to feed babies. However it isn’t actually true. Breast size has nothing to do with milk supply. It’s all hormones, and triggered by the baby’s suckling. Nipple stimulation causes increased milk production. More sucking, more milk, and vice versa. Most of big boobs is fat, not milk glands. You can be completely flat chested, like female chimpanzees, but still have all your milk glands, and then when you give birth it all kicks in and starts filling up with milk.
As for the big bottoms, that seems to be becoming a thing now. Women bragging about huge giant asses, I think look terrible but it’s supposed to be sexy? What’s up with that?
-
I like make up, and fishnet stockings. What say you?
;D
oh sure, eye makeup so that the woman looks like a racoon. What could be more attractive?
-
Maybe I should have left off the make-up, bras, and tampons. My point was that men provide nearly everything a society needs to function and live in comfort, including things from which they do not directly benefit.
We're not necessarily looking for validation, but the constant ingratitude from little liberal twats is tiresome. It wears us down -- to the point that when we see a woman in distress, we are less inclined to come to her aid.
That is one of the signs of a society on the verge of collapse.
-
Maybe I should have left off the make-up, bras, and tampons. My point was that men provide nearly everything a society needs to function and live in comfort, including things from which they do not directly benefit.
We're not necessarily looking for validation, but the constant ingratitude from little liberal twats is tiresome. It wears us down -- to the point that when we see a woman in distress, we are less inclined to come to her aid.
That is one of the signs of a society on the verge of collapse.
I asked Grok about those three specific things. Without copy/pasting its whole answer, the summary is that women were mostly responsible for the innovation of the ideas, but men get most of the credit for implementing them and scaling them up for mass distribution, as they do with all supply chain and manufacturing. We simply wouldn’t have any of it without men. Although it was a man who first came up with the tampon idea, but a woman ran with it and started the company Tampax.
We absolutely are in bad trouble if the young generations don’t reverse this growing disconnect between the sexes. It is indeed a sign of impending societal collapse. It’s one of the reasons I wish Trump would not be so enthusiastically promising great economic growth. Men who feel no gratitude from society for their work AND, more importantly feel no chance they will find a loving woman who will at least marry him and have sex with him once in a while if not gush with appreciation at everything men do, are not inclined to bother working at all. They get by on minimal effort, single and living in mom’s basement. Does Trump think young men are going to be beating down the door to all these new manufacturing plants coming back to the U.S.? Not unless they feel pressure to make enough of themselves to have a wife and family. But it looks like women are putting the kibosh on that whole idea.
-
This is a longer list than I was expecting (though this thread can lower one's expectations as to past accomplishments of women):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_and_discoveries_by_women (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_and_discoveries_by_women)
Just a note on consistent application of principles: if it isn't possible for men to have subjugated or demeaned women in the past so they couldn't reach their potential, then it shouldn't be possible for men in the present to complain they are being demeaned or subjugated by women or otherwise affected so not able to reach their potential (e.g. stats showing boys no longer doing as well in education.) Either both propositions would be true or both are false, as a matter of consistent application. Otherwise one must propose a theory, with supporting evidence, on why, say, women haven't been denied access to their potential by men but rather by biological constraints while men are now being denied their potential by women but not biological constraints.
It isn't surprising to me that the division of labor (and therefore relationships) between the sexes has changed dramatically as humanity has advanced from hunter-gatherer to pre-industrial agrarian and finally industrial.
-
This is a longer list than I was expecting (though this thread can lower one's expectations as to past accomplishments of women):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_and_discoveries_by_women (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inventions_and_discoveries_by_women)
Just a note on consistent application of principles: if it isn't possible for men to have subjugated or demeaned women in the past so they couldn't reach their potential, then it shouldn't be possible for men in the present to complain they are being demeaned or subjugated by women or otherwise affected so not able to reach their potential (e.g. stats showing boys no longer doing as well in education.) Either both propositions would be true or both are false, as a matter of consistent application. Otherwise one must propose a theory, with supporting evidence, on why, say, women haven't been denied access to their potential by men but rather by biological constraints while men are now being denied their potential by women but not biological constraints.
It isn't surprising to me that the division of labor (and therefore relationships) between the sexes has changed dramatically as humanity has advanced from hunter-gatherer to pre-industrial agrarian and finally industrial.
No, it’s not a simple reversible binary. Women have always had the upper hand. They are inferior on the physical level, so they evolved superior skills at psychological manipulation. In the movie “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” there is the line spoken by a wise older woman on the subject of male dominance that goes something like this: “The man is the head of the family. But the woman is the neck.”
There was a balance of power when we didn’t stray very far from our evolved biological roles. Women got their needs met by exerting influence on which direction the man turned his head. When mostly only men could engage in politics, higher education, and running of capitalist ventures, because women were busy with babies, these areas were where men steered society. But now women have invaded all these institutions, and there is no subtle psychological machinations by men on them to constrain and direct things to the good of all. It’s just free reign of unleashed unbalanced feminine without any masculine counterweight.
-
True, that big breasts signal to men the woman’s ability to feed babies. However it isn’t actually true. Breast size has nothing to do with milk supply. It’s all hormones, and triggered by the baby’s suckling. Nipple stimulation causes increased milk production. More sucking, more milk, and vice versa. Most of big boobs is fat, not milk glands. You can be completely flat chested, like female chimpanzees, but still have all your milk glands, and then when you give birth it all kicks in and starts filling up with milk.
As for the big bottoms, that seems to be becoming a thing now. Women bragging about huge giant asses, I think look terrible but it’s supposed to be sexy? What’s up with that?
Reality rarely collides with pop culture.
Fat asses are common among black women, especially, so pretending that makes them sexy is just another form of reverse racism.
-
Reality rarely collides with pop culture.
Fat asses are common among black women, especially, so pretending that makes them sexy is just another form of reverse racism.
Yes, it is rather obvious the source is black culture and it certainly has been taken up by whites too. Maybe it got started with the rap song “Baby Got Back” by Sir Mix-A-Lot. (“I like big butts and I cannot lie…”)
But in that song he’s talking about well developed gluts, not buckets of blubber that are today’s fat women, probably just another example of making obesity yet one more identity to celebrate.
-
No, it’s not a simple reversible binary. Women have always had the upper hand. They are inferior on the physical level, so they evolved superior skills at psychological manipulation. In the movie “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” there is the line spoken by a wise older woman on the subject of male dominance that goes something like this: “The man is the head of the family. But the woman is the neck.”
There was a balance of power when we didn’t stray very far from our evolved biological roles. Women got their needs met by exerting influence on which direction the man turned his head. When mostly only men could engage in politics, higher education, and running of capitalist ventures, because women were busy with babies, these areas were where men steered society. But now women have invaded all these institutions, and there is no subtle psychological machinations by men on them to constrain and direct things to the good of all. It’s just free reign of unleashed unbalanced feminine without any masculine counterweight.
Sadly, it is being borne in upon my consciousness that women are very capable of ruining things when they insinuate themselves into influential or unsuitable positions. The “unleashed unbalanced feminine” is emotion driven. That’s why they’re angry all the time. And if they have power, we all suffer. Not that men can’t ruin things too. Women just have a different way of doing it.
-
Yes, it is rather obvious the source is black culture and it certainly has been taken up by whites too. Maybe it got started with the rap song “Baby Got Back” by Sir Mix-A-Lot. (“I like big butts and I cannot lie…”)
But in that song he’s talking about well developed gluts, not buckets of blubber that are today’s fat women, probably just another example of making obesity yet one more identity to celebrate.
Unfortunately, Black culture drives a lot in the fashion, entertainment and sports worlds where young people think anything they do is cool. Thank Media also.
Celebrating every play in sports? Look at me, look at me. Blame Blacks.
Hip Hop/Rap, Gangsta culture? Guess who?
Big butts look WAY OUT OF PROPORTION to me, and are not attractive. However, EVERY younger girl/woman at my gym does several different butt exercises using the weights and stair climber. Many are just fine, but a few have over done it on the butt size.
Yeah, I like Racoons, so?
-
It seems that social media and the Kardashians are driving the current trend toward huge flabby butts. Celebrating those huge flabby butts by creating standing waves in the fat by bouncing up and down is just disgusting to me. Give me the Norwegian beach volleyball team any day.
-
It seems that social media and the Kardashians are driving the current trend toward huge flabby butts. Celebrating those huge flabby butts by creating standing waves in the fat by bouncing up and down is just disgusting to me. Give me the Norwegian beach volleyball team any day.
Like so many other things they are trying to mainstream a fetish. There is such a thing as fat fetish but like any fetish it was proper to keep it underground. You pretend it doesn’t exist in polite society. Parading sexual fetishes around in public, for kids to see no less, is a sign of societal breakdown. It’s bad news. It is elevating depravity to a public spectacle. Fetishes are harmless when private and consensual and thank God there are fat fetishists so the genetically obese of the old days could know love. But being fat today is way too common, caused by a century of bad diet, but instead of trying to fix the problem, the “fattybody positive” crowd turns it into yet another victimized identity and proceeds to inject it into the culture so it’s literally shoved in our faces with the big butt twerking everywhere. And yes it’s waves of unhealthy fat, not well toned gluts. Nothing wrong with the latter, especially on men. ;D
-
Along with the big butt thing apparently comes the trend of massively long and dark fake eyelashes glued on. When interacting with women wearing these I can’t help but stare. The lashes are completely beyond any sort of reality, size wise. Who starts these fads? And when I see it on someone, I know, sadly, that they are trying to find some sort of acceptance or attention that in the long run matters not at all. Sad.
-
Along with the big butt thing apparently comes the trend of massively long and dark fake eyelashes glued on. When interacting with women wearing these I can’t help but stare. The lashes are completely beyond any sort of reality, size wise. Who starts these fads? And when I see it on someone, I know, sadly, that they are trying to find some sort of acceptance or attention that in the long run matters not at all. Sad.
The massive eyelashes are to counterbalance the excess weight out back.
-
The massive eyelashes are to counterbalance the excess weight out back.
Classic Weight and Balance requirements for proper operations?
-
Tammy Fay Baker - a woman ahead of her time
-
Tammy Fay Baker - a woman ahead of her time
Right, the funny thing is the big fake eyelashes are retro fashion of the boomer generation which these same young’uns hold in contempt. Except we never made them that exaggerated, like giant tarantulas.
-
Tammy Fay Baker - a woman ahead of her time
Reminds me of the old joke, what does Tammy Fay Bakker have in common with a ski resort? Four feet of base, two feet of powder, and long lift lines.
-
Right, the funny thing is the big fake eyelashes are retro fashion of the boomer generation which these same young’uns hold in contempt. Except we never made them that exaggerated, like giant tarantulas.
Maybe they just have to be different somehow from us, even when copying us. We pioneered jeans for women, they had to put rips in theirs. And so on.
-
The massive eyelashes are to counterbalance the excess weight out back.
Haha!! Whoops, too much weight disparity!